Surgeon-performed sonographic findings in a traumatic trans-anal rectal perforation
© Abu-Zidan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 21 June 2011
Accepted: 12 August 2011
Published: 12 August 2011
Early diagnosis and active management of trans-anal rectal injuries is essential for a favorable outcome. Intraperitoneal free air (IFA) is usually diagnosed by an erect Chest X-ray. Point-of-care ultrasound has been recently used to detect IFA. We report a 45-year-old male who presented to the Emergency Department with lower abdominal peritonitis. Surgeon-performed portable point-of-care ultrasound as an extension of the abdominal examination revealed an inflamed omentum with hypoechoic stranding, thickened non compressible small bowel, and free fluid in the pelvis. A transverse abdominal section of the right upper quadrant showed free intraperitoneal air. Rectal examination revealed a longitudinal rectal tear. Laparotomy has confirmed the sonographic findings. There was a 12 cm intraperitoneal tear of the anterior wall of the rectum which was necrotic. This case clearly demonstrates that portable point-of-care ultrasound gives very useful detailed information even when performed by a non radiologist. Surgeons should be encouraged to use point-of-care ultrasound after appropriate training.
KeywordsRectal trauma ultrasound free intraperitoneal air
Rectal injuries are uncommon. They are mainly caused by penetrating trauma. Early diagnosis and active management of trans-anal rectal injuries is essential for a favorable outcome [1, 2]. Intraperitoneal rectal injuries will cause peritonitis, sepsis and even death if not detected early. Intraperitoneal free air (IFA) is usually diagnosed by an erect Chest X-ray . If the erect chest X-ray was normal, then an abdominal CT scan is recommended. Point-of-care ultrasound has been recently used to detect IFA [3, 4]. Hereby, we report an unusual case of trans-anal rectal injury in which point-of-care ultrasound was of a great help for an early diagnosis.
The diagnosis of trans-anal rectal injuries is usually delayed because of patient's denial and late presentation. Some of these injuries are self inflicted or caused by criminal assault [1, 2]. High index of suspicion is essential for diagnosis.
In the present patient, portable surgeon-performed point-of-care ultrasound gave very useful information. Point-of-care ultrasound is an extension of the clinical examination. It is a goal-directed study that can be used for rapid diagnosis. It is accurate, non-invasive, cost effective, repeatable, without risk of radiation, and can be done in unstable patients parallel to physical examination and resuscitation [5, 6].
It may be argued that ultrasound did not change the clinical management of our present patient. Bedside ultrasound is much quicker when performed by the treating surgeon as an extension of the abdominal examination than doing a formal chest X-ray in the Radiology Department. Furthermore, ultrasound can be done while the patient is in the supine position, and may detect small amount of free intraperitoneal air compared with an erect chest X-ray which may be negative in up to 10% of patients with perforated bowel. Small amount of free intraperitoneal air can be detected under the anterior abdominal wall and in Morison's pouch . This would be useful even in early bowel perforation without peritonitis. Furthermore, ultrasound is useful in disaster and austere situations when formal X-rays cannot be performed .
The ultrasound image of IFA results from the reverberation artefact of the ultrasound waves which swings between the ultrasound transducer and the highly reflective air. An increased echogenicity of a peritoneal stripe behind the anterior abdominal wall may be present [3, 7, 9]. The position of the stripe will change when changing the patient's position. Similar to our patient, trapped free intraperitoneal air bubbles in a localized fluid collection will give rise to echogenic foci [4, 7]. The associated findings of thickened omentum and bowel, and free pelvic fluid pointed towards peritonitis in our patient [3, 10].
We have performed bedside ultrasound as an extension of the abdominal examination in our patient before performing the rectal examination. Initially the patient denied the history of inserting a foreign body through his anus and he was diagnosed as having lower urinary tract infection in the Emergency Department. He was suspected to have bowel perforation only after the bedside ultrasound was performed.
It is important to stress that ultrasound usually rules in and does not rule out a bowel perforation which indicates that a negative study does not exclude a bowel perforation. FIA detection is operator dependable and can be difficult even for an experienced ultrasound operator [11, 12]. The ultrasound findings should be correlated with the clinical picture as a whole and used within defined diagnostic algorithms. If needed, and if the patient was haemodynamically stable, then an abdominal CT scan may give more information than ultrasound [13, 14].
It may also be argued that laparotomy would have reached the diagnosis in our patient any way. There are different decisions to be made in cases of peritonitis including the indication for laparotomy and its timing. It would be also useful to collect information about the cause and site of perforation if possible as this may help to decide on what incision to use. Ultrasound may occasionally diagnose the cause of peritonitis, like a perforated duodenal ulcer [4, 15].
Early diagnosis and active treatment results in a good prognosis. The good outcome of our patient, despite his multi-organ failure, occurred possibly because of his young age, and active surgical critical care management.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of his clinical details and accompanying images.
- Orr CJ, Clark MA, Hawley DA,et al: Fatal anorectal injuries: A series of four cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1995, 40: 219-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- El-Ashaal YI, Al-Olama A-K, Abu-Zidan FM: Trans-anal rectal injuries. Singapore Med J. 2008, 49: 54-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blaivas M, Kirkpatrick AW, Rodriguez-Galvez M, Ball CG: Sonographic depiction of intraperitoneal free air. J Trauma. 2009, 67: 675-10.1097/TA.0b013e31804b488d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patel SV, Gopichandran TD: Ultrasound evidence of gas in the fissure for ligamentum teres: a sign of perforated duodenal ulcer. Br J Radiol. 1999, 72: 901-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Zidan FM, al-Zayat I, Sheikh M, Mousa I, Behbehani A: Role of ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma, a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1996, 162: 361-365.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Zidan FM, Freeman P, Diku Mandivia: The first Australasian workshop on bedside ultrasound in the Emergency Department. NZ Med J. 1999, 112: 322-324.Google Scholar
- Hefny AF, Abu-Zidan FM: Sonographic diagnosis of intraperitoneal free air. J Emerg Trauma Shock.
- Dittrich K, Abu-Zidan FM: Role of Ultrasound in Mass-Casualty Situations. International Journal of Disaster Medicine. 2004, 2: 18-23. 10.1080/15031430410024813.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pattison P, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Sommer FG: Sonography of intraabdominal gas collections. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997, 169: 1559-64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee DH, Lim JH, Ko YT, Yoon Y: Sonographic detection of pneumoperitoneum in patients with acute abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990, 154: 107-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen SC, Wang HP, Chen WJ, Lin FY, Hsu CY, Chang KJ,et al: Selective use of ultrasonography for the detection of pneumoperitoneum. Acad Emerg Med. 2002, 9: 643-5. 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb02307.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chadha D, Kedar RP, Malde HM: Sonographic detection of pneumoperitoneum: An experimental and clinical study. Australas Radiol. 1993, 37: 182-5. 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1993.tb00046.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Radwan MM, Abu-Zidan FM: Focussed Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) and CT scan in blunt abdominal trauma: surgeon's perspective. Afr Health Sci. 2006, 6: 187-90.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abu-Zidan FM, Sheikh M, Jaddallah F, Windsor JA: Blunt abdominal trauma: Comparison of ultrasonography and computed tomography. Austral Radiol. 1999, 43: 440-3. 10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.00708.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- García Santos JM: Direct sonographic signs of acute duodenal ulcer. Abdom Imaging. 1999, 24: 226-7. 10.1007/s002619900485.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.