Open Access

Endoscopic rendez-vous after damage control surgery in treatment of retroperitoneal abscess from perforated duodenal diverticulum: a techinal note and literature review

  • Ivan Barillaro1,
  • Veronica Grassi1, 6Email author,
  • Angelo De Sol1,
  • Claudio Renzi2,
  • Giovanni Cochetti3,
  • Francesco Barillaro3,
  • Alessia Corsi2,
  • Alban Cacurri1,
  • Adolfo Petrina4,
  • Lucio Cagini5,
  • Carlo Boselli2,
  • Roberto Cirocchi1 and
  • Giuseppe Noya2
World Journal of Emergency Surgery20138:26

DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-26

Received: 2 March 2013

Accepted: 7 June 2013

Published: 16 July 2013

Abstract

Introduction

The duodenum is the second seat of onset of diverticula after the colon. Duodenal diverticulosis is usually asymptomatic, but duodenal perforation with abscess may occur.

Case presentation

Woman, 83 years old, emergency hospitalised for generalized abdominal pain. On the abdominal tomography in the third portion of the duodenum a herniation and a concomitant full-thickness breach of the visceral wall was detected. The patient underwent emergency surgery. A surgical toilette of abscess was performed passing through the perforated diverticula and the Petzer’s tube drainage was placed in the duodenal lumen; the duodenostomic Petzer was endoscopically removed 4 months after the surgery.

Discussion

A review of medical literature was performed and our treatment has never been described.

Conclusion

For the treatment of perforated duodenal diverticula a sequential two-stage non resective approach is safe and feasible in selected cases.

Keywords

Duodenum Diverticula Complications Perforation Surgical treatment

Introduction

The duodenum is the most common site for diverticula after the colon [1]. Duodenal diverticula, which can be single or multiple, are found in 5-10% of radiologic and endoscopic exams [2]. In over 70% of cases they are localized in the second portion of the duodenum, less frequently in the third or the fourth one, exceptionally in the first one [2, 3]. They are usually asymptomatic; on the other hand they can determine abdominal postprandial pain, dyspeptic disorders or colic-like pains [2]; diverticulitis, bleeding, perforation may rarely occur [4, 5]. The first case report of duodenal diverticulosis, describing a diverticulum containing 22 gallstones, was performed in 1710 by Chomel [6]. Surgery is necessary only if symptoms are persistent or if complications arise [7]: the diagnosis of perforated diverticula of the third duodenal portion is late and the management is still matter of debate [812]. In this techinal note we report a new sequential treatment of perforated duodenal diverticula.

Case presentation

Woman, 83 years old, emergency hospitalised for generalized abdominal pain. She reported some alimentary vomiting episodes and diarrheic bowel had occurred during the 3 days before admission and a history of colonic diverticular disease. In the physical examination globular abdomen and pain after deep palpation of the epi-mesogastric region were observed. Laboratory tests resulted within the normal range: leukocytes were 4720/mm3 (normal range 4500-10800/mm3), hematocrit was 50,5% (normal range 38-46%), haemoglobin was 11.4 g/dl (normal range 12–16 g/dl). The patient underwent plain abdominal X-Ray, which revealed neither free sub-diaphragmatic air nor air-fluid levels. Computed tomography (CT) scans, taken in emergency, showed a densitometric alteration in the periduodenal adipose tissue for the presence of multiple pools which extended along the right lateroconal fascia and occupied the anterior pararenal space, which includes the second and the third portion of the duodenum (Figure 1). At this exam a subtle perihepatic effusion layer was also detected. Within the third day from admission, after the onset of fever, leukocytosis, because of the increase of abdominal pain and the progressive clinical worsening a second abdominal CT scan was performed (Figure 2). This last radiological exam allowed to definitively exclude pneumoperitoneum; a wall herniation in the third portion of the duodenum containing endoluminal material and a breach in the medial wall of the same bowel segment were observed. Furthermore, contiguously to the duodenal breach, within the adipose tissue, in the context of an underlying fluid layer, air bubbles were detected. Being these findings strongly suggestive of a locally confined perforation, the patient in sepsis (temperature 39°C, increased heart rate, leukocytes 16400/mm3) underwent emergency surgery. A partial coloepiploic detachment, Kocher manoeuvre to the proximal half of the II duodenal portion and subsequent isolation of the III one were performed; at this level, on the upper edge, a perforated diverticulum occupied the retroperitoneal space and it was partly surrounded by an abscess. The large implant base of the diverticulum prevented both the resection and the direct suture, being the laceration too jagged, thickened and oedematous (Figure 3). The septic condition of the patient prevented a derivation surgery, which would have been time consuming, demolitive and hazardous. A surgical toilette of abscess was performed passing through the perforated diverticula and the Petzer’s tube drainage was placed in the duodenal lumen (Figure 4). On the first post-operative week the patient was fed with parenteral nutrition, on the second week the patient started a liquid diet and on the 15th post-operative day the patient got a solid diet. No postoperative complications occurred and the patient was discharged on the 30th post-operative day. The duodenostomic Petzer was endoscopically removed 4 months after the surgery. The Petzer’s drainage tube was grasped by endoscopic transgastric way and then removed outside by oral way. In relation to the general condition of the patient was necessary to insert a nasogastric tube into the duodenum for 15 days to reduce the possibility of leak. During the procedure a nasogastric tube, previously anchored on the cutaneous edge of the Petzer, was pulled in the duodenum without effort, being the former on guide of the latter. A drainage tube was percutaneously positioned in the fistulous tract with its distal extremity outside the duodenum. Radiologic follow up with Gastrographin® confirmed the right position both of the nasogastric tube in the duodenum at the level of the fistulous orifice and of the drainage tube inside the tract, at about 4 cm from the wall of the duodenum. The drainage tube was left in place for 15 days (Figure 5). This procedure ensures less trauma and fewer potential complications in the subjects strongly debilitated. Fourteen days after, the patient underwent transit X-Ray with Gastromiro® which showed a normal passage of the contrast medium without any sign of spillages or fistulous tracts. Check-up carried out after 12 months shows normal results.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-26/MediaObjects/13017_2013_Article_303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

CT on admission.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-26/MediaObjects/13017_2013_Article_303_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

CT after three days from the admission.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-26/MediaObjects/13017_2013_Article_303_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Intraoperative finding.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-26/MediaObjects/13017_2013_Article_303_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Petzer’s tube drainage placement.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-26/MediaObjects/13017_2013_Article_303_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

Nasogastric tube positioned in front of the diverticulum, anchored with a thread outside the drainage tube.

Discussion

In our techinal note we reported a new surgical treatment of retroperitoneal abscess from diverticular perforation of the III duodenal portion with endoscopic rendez-vous after damage control surgery. The advantage of this technique consists in performing a non-resective approach with no post operative complication rate. Duodenal diverticula located in the first portion have a low incidence; their site is on the anterior face or on the external right curve edge of the duodenum and their surgical management do not present remarkable technical difficulties. Duodenal diverticula are usually asymptomatic, surgery is needed in less than 3% of cases [8], when clinical manifestations or complications are observed. In about 10% of cases duodenal diverticula are symptomatic (bleeding, pain and nausea caused by distension or inflammation) [13, 14] and they enter in the differential diagnosis of the acute abdomen [1517]. Complications of duodenal diverticula are rare, but they could be devasting; the most frequent one is diverticulitis with perforation. Since diverticula of third portion are usually located in the retroperitoneal space, the onset of symptoms is often insidious and diagnosis is often delayed [18]. Even if several cases are described in which a conservative management with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage is preferred [19, 20], this treatment should be taken only after a careful consideration. In literature, several types of treatments are described, both surgical or conservative, according to the patient’s condition and the localization of the duodenal diverticulum: segmental duodenectomies, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (p-p Whipple), diverticulectomies [11]. At the moment, the conventional treatment is diverticulectomy with duodenal closure and drainage positioning, especially when they are located in the retroperitoneal space [2123]. The revision of the medical literature does not reveal any surgical treatment equal to ours for complicated diverticula in the third duodenal portion. A review of medical literature was performed; the research was restricted to studies published between September 1985 and December 2012. We reviewed 40 studies producing 64 cases. We considered the treatment of the perforated duodenal diverticulum; the results of this review was reported in Table 1. Perforations were most commonly located in the second (78% of cases) and in the third portion of the duodenum (17% of cases). The most common approach is surgical (80% of cases), although only few reports of conservative management with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage are available (3% of cases). The indications to a surgical intervention and eventually the choice of the correct surgical approach, depend on the patient’s clinical situation and intraoperative findings. If the inflammation didn’t severely impair the access to the interested structures and their integrity, the treatment of choice is, after Kocher manoeuvre, diverticulectomy with single or double-layer duodenal closure (45% of cases). It is important to place drainage tubes, especially in the retroperitoneum, if affected. A slice of the greater omentum can be patched over the closure. Injury to the pancreatic or distal common bile duct can be avoided by placing a tube into the ampulla of Vater before dissecting the diverticulum. When there is substantial inflammation of the duodenum, a diversion should be performed by a subtotal gastrectomy followed by Billroth II reconstruction, or a Roux-en-Y gastroenteroanastomosis (12% of cases). Only patients with mild disease are likely to benefit from non-operative management. In the case described above, the demolition of the duodeno-cephalo-pancreatic region, as well as the confectioning of a bilio-digestive anastomosis of hepatic type or a choledochal jejunostomy for bypass purpose, were not affordable because of the septic conditions caused by the purulent peritonitis. Our treatment, to our knowledge, has never been described, and we propose it as a new and innovative treatment for partients whose general conditions do not allow demolitive invasive surgery.
Table 1

Kind of treatment of perforated duodenal diverticulum reported in medical literature

Author

Pz

Duodenal portion

Year

Kind of treatment performed

Type of treatment

Surgical

Non-surgical

Thorson CM et al. [11]

4

II portion

2012

Non operative management

 

Bowel rest antibiotics

Metcalfe MJ et al. [24]

1

II portion

2010

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Gottschalk U et al. [25]

1

II portion

2010

Endoscopical treatment

  

Lee HH et al. [23]

1

II portion

2010

Surgical treatment

Laparoscopic Diverticulectomy

 

Volchok J et al. [26]

1

II portion

2009

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Lopez-Zarraga F et al. [27]

1

II portion

2009

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Ames JT et al. [28]

8

II portion

2009

Surgical treatment and nonoperative management

NR

Bowel rest antibiotics

III portion

Guinier D et al. [29]

1

II portion

2008

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

NR

Schnueriger B et al. [10]

5

II Portion

2008

Surgical treatment and nonoperative management

-Segmental duodenectomy

PTC tube, Bowel rest, Antibiotics

III Portion

IV Portion

-Pylorus-preserving duodeno-pancreatectomy (pp-Whipple)

-Diverticulectomy

Martinez-Cecilia D et al. [19]

1

II Portion

2008

Conservative treatment

NR

Bowel Rest, Antibiotics and percutaneous drainage

Huang RY et al. [20]

1

II Portion

2007

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

NR

Hirota S et al. [30]

1

II portion

2007

Surgical treatment

NR

NR

Andromanakos N et al. [31]

1

II Portion

2007

Surgical treatment

Subtotal gastrectomy and antecolic anastomosis and retroperitoneal drainage

NR

Valenzuela Martínez MJ et al. [32]

1

II Portion

2006

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Safioleas M et al. [33]

1

II portion

2006

Surgical treatment

Gastrojejunostomy, drenage

 

Castellví J et al. [34]

1

III Portion

2006

Surgical treatment

Gastroenteroanastomosis and biliary drainage with Kehr, gastrojejunostomy

NR

Miller G et al. [8]

3

II Portion

2005

Surgical treatment and nonoperative management

Diverticulectomy, diversion (pyloric exclusion, gastrojejunostomy)

Antibiotics, bowel rest

III Portion

Papalambros E et al. [35]

1

III Portion

2005

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy and duodenostomy at the second duodenal portion

 

Lee VT et al. [36]

1

II Portion

2005

Surgical treatment

Roux -en- Y duodenojejunostomy.

 

Bergman S et al. [22]

1

II portion

2005

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy and duodenotomy

 

Marhin WW et al. [37]

2

II portion

2005

Surgical and conservative treatment

Diverticulectomy

Antibiotics therapy

Yokomuro S et al. [7]

1

II portion

2004

Surgical treatment

Primary closure with drainage

 

Sakurai Y et al. [6]

1

II portion

2004

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Yarze JC et al. [38]

1

II portion

2002

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Franzen D et al. [16]

1

II portion

2002

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Atmani A et al. [39]

2

II portion

2002

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy lateral duodenostomy, T tube

 

Gulotta G et al. [40]

1

II portion

2001

Surgical treatment

Diverticulo-jejunostomy on a Roux-en-Y

 

Eeckhout G et al. [41]

1

II portion

2000

Percutaneous and endoscopic management

  

Tsukamoto T et al. [42]

2

II portion

1999

Surgical treatment and nonoperative management

Diverticulectomy

Antibiotics, percutaneous abscess drainage.

Rao PM et al. [15]

1

III portion

1999

Surgical treatment

NR

 

Poostizadeh A et al. [43]

1

III portion

1997

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy, Gastrostomy

 

Ido K et al. [44]

1

II portion

1997

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

Cavanagh JE et al. [45]

1

II portion

1996

Surgical treatment

Malecot drainage in diverticulum

 

Mehdi A et al. [46]

2

II portion

1994

Surgical treatment

Diverticulectomy

 

III portion

Guglielmi A et al. [47]

2

II portion

1993

Surgical treatment

Diverticuletomy, diversion

 

Pugash RA et al. [48]

2

II portion

1990

Surgical treatment

Aspiration, drainage, T tube

 

Steinman E et al. [49]

2

II portion

1989

Surgical treatment

Drainage

 

III portion

Beech RR et al. [50]

1

II portion

1985

Surgical treatment

Tube duodenostomy

 

Stebbings WS et al. [51]

2

I portion

1985

Surgical treatment

Diverticuletomy, primary closure with drainage

 

Conclusion

Our two-stage technique consisting in damage control surgery and endoscopic review enabled us to treat a patient with retroperitoneal abscess from the third portion of the duodenum for which a more demolishing surgical procedure was not recommended. This method implies a close multidisciplinary relation between the surgeon, the endoscopist and the interventional radiologist.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
General and Emergency Surgical Clinic. S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia
(2)
General and Oncological Surgical Clinic. S. Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia
(3)
Urological Andrological Surgery and Minimally Invasive Techniques. S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia
(4)
General Surgical Clinic. S. Maria della Misericordia
(5)
Thoracic Surgery Unit. S. Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia
(6)
General and Emergency Surgical Clinic. S. Maria Hospital, University of Perugia

References

  1. Knoefel WT, Rattner DW: Duodenal diverticula and duodenal tumours, 1. Oxford Text Book of Surgery. Edited by: Morris PJ, Malt RA. 1994, New York: Oxford University Press, 943-946.Google Scholar
  2. Evers BM: Small intestine. In Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biological basis of modern surgical practice. 18th edition. Edited by Townsend CM,Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2008:1318–1319.Google Scholar
  3. Dionigi R, Mosca F, Dominioni L, Dionigi G: Stomaco e duodeno. Chirurgia: basi teoriche e chirurgia generale. Edited by: Dionigi R. Milano: Elsevier Masson,2002: 503-3Google Scholar
  4. Evers BM, Townsend CM, Thompson JC: Small intestine. Schwartz's principles of surgery. Edited by: Shwartz SI, Shires GT, Spencer FC, Daly JM, Fischer JE, Galloway AC. 1999, New York: MCGraw-Hill, 1247-7Google Scholar
  5. Chomel JB: Report of a case of duodenal diverticulum containing gallstones. Histoire Acad R Sci Paris. 1710, 48-50.Google Scholar
  6. Sakurai Y, Miura H, Matsubara T: Perforated duodenal diverticulum successfully diagnosed preoperatively with abdominal CT scan associated with upper gastrointestinal series. J Gastroenterol. 2004, 39: 379-383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yokomuro S, Uchida E, Arima Y: Simple closure of a perforated duodenal diverticulum: “a case report”. J Nihon Med Sch. 2004, 71: 337-339.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Miller G, Mueller C, Yim D: Perforated duodenal diverticulitis: a report of three cases. Dig Surg. 2005, 22: 198-202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen CF, Wu DC, Chen CW: Successful management of perforated duodenal diverticulitis with intra-abdominal drainage and feeding jejunostomy: a case report and literature review. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2008, 24: 425-429.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schnueriger B, Vorburger SA, Banz VM: Diagnosis and management of the symptomatic duodenal diverticulum: a case series and a short review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008, 12: 1571-1576.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Thorson CM, Paz Ruiz PS, Roeder RA: The perforated duodenal diverticulum. Arch Surg. 2012, 147: 81-88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lida F: Transduodenal diverticulectomy for periampullar diverticula. World J Surg. 1979, 3 (103–6): 135-136.Google Scholar
  13. Pearl MS, Hill MC, Zeman RK: CT findings in duodenal diverticulitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006, 187: 392-395.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Donald JW: Major complications of small bowel diverticula. Ann Surg. 1979, 190: 183-188.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rao PM: Case 11: perforated duodenal diverticulitis. Radiology. 1999, 211: 711-713.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Franzen D, Gürtler T, Metzger U: Solitary duodenal diverticulum with enterolith as a rare cause of acute abdomen. Swiss Surg. 2002, 8: 277-279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller RE, McCabe RE, Salomon PF, Knox WG: Surgical complications of small bowel diverticula exclusive of Meckel's. Ann Surg. 1970, 171: 202-210.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Beers B, Trigaux JP, De Ronde T, Melange M: CT findings of perforated duodenal diverticulitis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989, 13: 528-530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Martinez-Cecilia D, Arjona-Sanchez A, Gomez-Alvarez M: Conservative management of perforated duodenal diverticulum: a case report and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2008, 14: 1949-1951.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang RY, Romano AE, Stone ME, Nathanson N: Diagnosis and treatment of a perforated duodenal diverticulum. Emerg Radiol. 2007, 13: 285-287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lotveit T, Skar V, Osnes M: Juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula. Endoscopy. 1988, 20: 175-178.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bergman S, Koumanis J, Stein LA: Duodenal diverticulum with retroperitoneal perforation. Can J Surg. 2005, 48: 332-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee HH, Hong JY, Oh SN: Laparoscopic diverticulectomy for a perforated duodenal diverticulum: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010, 20: 757-760.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Metcalfe MJ, Rashid TG, Bird RR: Isolated perforation of a duodenal diverticulum following blunt abdominal trauma. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010, 3: 79-81.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gottschalk U, Becker C, Stöhr M: Duodenal diverticulum–a therapeutic challenge. Gastroenterol. 2010, 48: 551-554.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Volchok J, Massimi T, Wilkins S: Duodenal diverticulum: case report of a perforated extraluminal diverticulum containing ectopic pancreatic tissue. Arch Surg. 2009, 144: 188-190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. López Zárraga F, Saenz De Ormijana J, Diez Orive M: Abdominal pain in a young woman. Eur Radiol. 2009, 19: 2783-2786. NovView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ames JT, Federle MP, Pealer KM: Perforated duodenal diverticulum: clinical and imaging findings in eight patients. Abdom Imaging. 2009, 34: 135-139. Mar-AprView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Guinier D, Kovacs R: Spontaneous perforation of a retroperitoneal duodenal diverticulum. J Chir (Paris). 2008, 145: 287-288. May-JunView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirota S, Tsujikawa T, Kitoh K: An elderly woman with duodenal perforation difficulty diagnose. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2007, 44: 752-755.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Andromanakos N, Filippou D, Skandalakis P: An extended retroperitoneal abscess caused by duodenal diverticulum perforation: report of a case and short review of the literature. Am Surg. 2007, 73: 85-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Valenzuela Martínez MJ, Bonasa E, Sánchez JM: Traumatic perforation of a duodenal diverticulum. Cir Esp. 2006, 80: 224-226.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Safioleas M, Stamatakos MK, Mouzopoulos GJ: Pancreatic abscess due to perforation of duodenal diverticulum. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2006, 101: 523-524. Sep-OctGoogle Scholar
  34. Castellví J, Pozuelo O, Vallet J: Perforated duodenal diverticulum. Cir Esp. 2006, 80: 174-175.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Papalambros E, Felekouras E, Sigala F: Retroperitoneal perforation of a duodenal diverticulum with colonic necrosis - report of a case. Zentralbl Chir. 2005, 130: 270-273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee VT, Chung AY, Soo KC: Mucosal repair of posterior perforation of duodenal diverticulitis using roux loop duodenojejunostomy. Asian J Surg. 2005, 28: 139-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Marhin WW, Amson BJ: Management of perforated duodenal diverticula. Can J Surg. 2005, 48: 79-80.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yarze JC: Duodenoscopic diagnosis of perforated periampullary diverticulitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002, 97: 769-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Atmani A, Lachachi F, Sodji M: Perforated juxta-papillary duodenal diverticula: two cases. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2002, 26: 285-288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gulotta G, Agosta G, Romano G: Perforated duodenal diverticulum: report of a case. Chir Ital. 2001, 53: 255-258. Jan-FebPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Eeckhout G, Vanstiphout J, Van Pottelbergh I: Endoscopic treatment of a perforated duodenal diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2000, 32: 991-993.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Tsukamoto T, Ohta Y, Hamba H: Perforated duodenal diverticulum: report of two cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999, 46: 1755-1758. May-JunPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Poostizadeh A, Gow KW, Al-Mahmeed T: Traumatic perforation of duodenal diverticulum. J Trauma. 1997, 43: 370-371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ido K, Agata H, Toshimitsu K: Preoperative diagnosis of perforated duodenal diverticulum with ultrasonography. Clin Ultrasound. 1997, 25: 149-153. Mar-AprView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Cavanagh JE: Iatrogenic perforation of perivaterian duodenal diverticulum: report of a case. Can J Surg. 1996, 39: 336-338.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mehdi A, Closset J, Houben JJ: Duodenal diverticula--diagnosis and management of complicated forms: report of two clinical cases and review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg. 1994, 94: 311-313. Nov-DecPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Guglielmi A, Veraldi GF, Leopardi F: The perforation of a para-Vater's duodenal diverticulum (a report of 2 clinical cases) Ann Ital Chir. May-Jun;. 1993, 64: 309-312. discussion 313Google Scholar
  48. Pugash RA, O'Brien SE, Stevenson GW: Perforating duodenal diverticulitis. Gastrointest Radiol. 1990, 15: 156-158.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Steinman E, Utiyama EM, Bevilacqua RG: [Perforated duodenal diverticulum: a report of 2 cases]. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 1989, 44: 121-123. May-JunPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Beech RR, Friesen DL, Shield CF: Perforated duodenal diverticulum: treatment by tube duodenostomy. Curr Surg. 1985, 42: 462-465. Nov-DecPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stebbings WS, Thomson JP: Perforated duodenal diverticulum: a report of two cases. Postgrad Med J. 1985, 61: 839-840.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Barillaro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement