Off-pump suture repair of left ventricular rupture utilizing TachoComb® sheet: a case report and literature review

  • Hiroki Yamaguchi1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Tatsuya Nakao1,

      Affiliated with

      • Noriyuki Tokunaga1,

        Affiliated with

        • Hiromasa Nakamura1 and

          Affiliated with

          • Masami Takagaki1

            Affiliated with

            World Journal of Emergency Surgery20138:29

            DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-29

            Received: 15 April 2013

            Accepted: 23 July 2013

            Published: 27 July 2013

            Abstract

            A 70-year-old woman was admitted to our institution with acute myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography demonstrated total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery, which was successfully revascularized. Four days later, the patient suddenly went into shock. The subsequent emergency operation revealed a blowout rupture of the left ventricular free wall. Several TachoComb® (CSL Behring, Tokyo, Japan) sheets were applied to control bleeding and avoid the need for a cardiopulmonary bypass. Horizontal mattress sutures were used in combination with a pair of Teflon felt strips for reinforcement. The combination of TachoComb® sheets and sutures is a novel hybrid method and an effective life-saving procedure for the treatment of left ventricular blowout ruptures. This approach avoids the need for a cardiopulmonary bypass. Sutureless repairs with TachoComb® sheet achieve rapid hemostasis without the need for cardiopulmonary bypass. This stabilizes patient hemodynamics immediately and preserves the fragile myocardium. This allows emergency room physicians to open the chest and apply the TachoComb® sheet to stabilize the patient before the cardiac surgeons arrive at the operating room. This technique will be very useful in emergency situations.

            Keywords

            Myocardial infarction Left ventricular rupture Off-pump surgery Emergency room

            Background

            Left ventricular (LV) free wall rupture is a serious complication of acute myocardial infarction that may result in acute cardiac tamponade and sudden death. Among the various surgical procedures available for its treatment, sutureless repair using layered sheets of collagen fleece with fibrinogen-based impregnation (TachoComb®, CSL Behring, Tokyo, Japan) has proved the most effective [13]. Unlike prepare-to-use fibrin sealants, which require the coating of fibrin glue onto fleece or patching immediately before or during surgery, TachoComb® is a ready-to-use fixed combination that is activated by moisture upon application, providing adherence to the resection surface. Hemostasis is generally achieved after 3–5 min of compression [4]. However, this technique alone is associated with a potential risk for future complications such as pseudoaneurysm formation and rerupture [5, 6]. We therefore developed a novel hybrid method for the treatment of blowout ruptures of the LV free wall that combines TachoComb® sheets with suture repair, avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Because this procedure can be performed without CPB, it is easily applicable even in an emergency room.

            Case presentation

            A 70-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital with a 3-day-old acute myocardial infarction. Although the patient reported adherence to the prescribed medication regimen, she developed heart failure with hypotension and oliguria the next day. Coronary angiography performed under intra-aortic balloon pumping demonstrated total occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD). Subsequent percutaneous coronary intervention achieved successful revascularization of LAD. The patient recovered steadily and gradually. However, four days later, her condition deteriorated suddenly and she went into shock. Her echocardiography results revealed cardiac tamponade with substantial pericardial effusion. Pericardiocentesis was performed, resulting in massive continuous drainage, and she was referred to us for emergency surgery.

            The patient was markedly cyanotic and in cardiogenic shock with systolic blood pressure of 70 mm Hg. A large dose of dopamine had been administered. She was intubated immediately, and the results of blood gas analysis showed marked metabolic acidosis with a pH of 7.251 and a base excess of −13.2 mmol/l. Emergency surgery was undertaken via a median sternotomy. Upon opening the pericardium, a blowout rupture of the LV free wall was found. A large volume of fresh blood was expelled rapidly from the tear at the LV base, between LAD and its diagonal branch. We were unable to measure the size of the tear, because we had to cover the area quickly with TachoComb® sheets to achieve hemostasis. The LV apex was dyskinetic. A total of three TachoComb® sheets (5 × 5 cm each) were applied to the bleeding point and the surrounding area of fragile necrotic tissue. The major source of bleeding was controlled, but a small amount of blood continued to flow out the lower part of the sheet (Figure  1). Four 3–0 polypropylene (SH) horizontal mattress sutures were then used to secure a pair of Teflon felt strips over the TachoComb® sheets. The sutures were placed approximately 1 cm from the perforated myocardial region. Extreme care was taken to avoid LAD and its diagonal branch. After complete hemostasis was achieved, an additional TachoComb® sheet and fibrin glue were applied (Figure  2). The entire LV repair was performed without CPB. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit with dramatically improved hemodynamics. The postoperative course was uneventful, and she walked out of the hospital on day 35. The patient was followed up until 3 months, when she died because of cerebral bleeding.
            http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-29/MediaObjects/13017_2013_305_Fig1_HTML.jpg
            Figure 1

            Operative view of the ruptured left ventricle. The major source of bleeding was a blowout rupture between the left anterior descending artery and its diagonal branch, which was controlled by manual compression (black arrow).

            http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-29/MediaObjects/13017_2013_305_Fig2_HTML.jpg
            Figure 2

            Intraoperative view after repair. TachoComb® sheets applied to the ventricle (black arrowheads) followed by Teflon felt strip sutures (black arrows).

            Discussion and literature review

            LV free wall rupture is the third-most serious complication and the second-most common cause of death after myocardial infarction [1, 7]. The patient reported herein was in an extremely serious condition on referral, and the emergency surgery performed at our institution was necessary to save her life. The new hybrid method described here was designed to control the bleeding as quickly as possible without increasing the risks for future complications such as pseudoaneurysms and reruptures [5, 6].

            Various procedures and strategies have been developed to treat LV free wall ruptures (Table  1). The choice among them is made on the basis of three main considerations: (1) type of rupture, (2) with or without CPB, and (3) suture closure or sutureless repair. Blowout ruptures are often treated by infarctectomy combined with suture closure and/or patch repair, usually with CPB [710]. Oozing/sealed ruptures are often treated by sutureless repair without CPB [13, 10]. Recent myocardial infarction decreases the heart’s tolerance to subsequent global ischemia even when protected by hypothermic cardioplegia. Therefore, it is preferable to repair a ruptured LV free wall without CPB. Although the suture closure technique is a classic standard procedure, it is difficult to suture fragile myocardium because of the risk of mechanical tearing [1, 2, 11]. Many surgeons have recently reported that sutureless repair using TachoComb® sheets can efficiently achieve hemostasis [3, 5, 6, 11]. However, this strategy is not usually suitable for blowout ruptures, where the myocardial tear is often large and bleeding is copious [13]. Although Nishizaki et al. [11] reported successful sutureless repairs with use of the TachoComb® sheet for a blowout rupture from a 1-cm tear, the risks of such an approach are possible future complications such as pseudoaneurysm and rerupture [5, 6].
            Table 1

            Reference review for surgical repair of the left ventricular free wall rupture

            Reference

            Year

            Article type

            No. of pts.

            Rupture type

            Surgical procedures

            CPB

            Stiegel et al. [9]

            1987

            Case report

            1

            Blow-out

            Suture closure and patch repair

            Yes

            Sutherland et al. [8]

            1996

            Case report/Review

            1

            Blow-out

            Suture closure

            Yes

            Reardon et al. [7]

            1997

            Case report

            1

            Blow-out

            Infarctectomy and patch repair

            Yes

            Iemura et al. [1]

            2001

            Original article

            17

            Oozing (n=14), Blow-out (n=3)

            Infarctectomy and patch repair (n=1), Direct closure (n=4), Patch repair (n=4), Sutureless patch repair (n=7), Endventricular patch closure (VSP) (n=1)

            Yes (n=12)

                  

            No (n=5)

            Lachapelle et al. [2]

            2002

            Original article

            6

            Oozing (n=3), Blow-out (n=3)

            Sutureless patch repair (n=6)

            Yes (n=4)

                  

            No (n=2)

            Fukushima et al. [5]

            2003

            Case report

            1

            Oozing

            Sutureless repair with TachoComb

            No

            Nishizaki et al. [11]

            2004

            Case report

            1

            Blow-out

            Sutureless repair with TachoComb

            No

            Muto et al. [3]

            2005

            Case report

            1

            Oozing

            Sutureless repair with TachoComb

            No

            Kimura et al. [6]

            2005

            Case report

            1

            Blow-out

            Sutureless repair with TachoComb

            No

            Sakaguchi et al. [10]

            2008

            Original article

            32

            Unknown (n=28), Blow-out(n=4)

            Sutureless repair with autologous pericardial patch and gelatinresorcin formaldehyde glue +− additional sutures

            Yes (n=6)

                  

            No (n=26)

            Pocar et al. [13]

            2012

            Original article

            3

            Unknown

            Sutureless repair with TachoSil combined with pericardial patch and fibrin glue

            Yes

            Raffa et al. [14]

            2013

            Original article

            6

            Oozing (n=4), Blow-out (n=2)

            Sutureless repair with TachoSil

            Yes (n=3)

                  

            No (n=3)

            No. of pts. Number of patients, CPB Cardiopulmonary bypass, VSP Ventricular septal perforation.

            The advantages of sutureless repairs with TachoComb® sheets include rapid hemostasis without the need for CPB, which allows for the immediate stabilization of patient hemodynamics and preservation of the fragile myocardium [2, 3, 5, 6]. Furthermore, even physicians in an emergency room can open the chest and apply a TachoComb® sheet to stabilize the patient before the cardiac surgeons arrive at the operating room. We therefore developed a new hybrid method that combines use of the TachoComb® sheet with suture closure to utilize the advantages of both procedures. Because of the risk of mechanical tearing, we do not recommend the use of this technique for tears >1 cm. However, the procedure can be performed safely without CPB, which represents a substantial advantage in emergency situations.

            Although TachoComb® has frequently been used for the treatment of both venous and arterial bleeding, anaphylactic reactions have been reported after the repeated use of hemostatic agents such as TachoComb® that contain aprotinin. Because aprotinin is also associated with risks of renal failure, a new product, TachoSil® (Nycomed, Zurich, Switzerland), which lacks aprotinin and contains human rather than bovine thrombin, has been developed. TachoSil® is known to be equally hemostatic to TachoComb®[12]. Several cases of LV rupture have been treated successfully utilizing TachoSil® (Table  1) [13, 14].

            Our report has some limitations. First, the report here describes a single case. Further investigation including postoperative follow-up in a large number of patients will be necessary to support our hypothesis. Second, our technique does not address LV aneurysms, which could lead to heart failure and/or thromboembolisms. TachoComb® sheets covering the LV surface could complicate a concomitant or subsequent coronary artery bypass graft. Indeed, Iemura et al. [1] maintain that if subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting is needed, identification and exposure of the coronary artery will be difficult because of the widely and deeply piled collagen hemostats. However, the main goal of surgery for LV rupture is to save the patient’s life by relieving the cardiac tamponade and to close the rupture [2, 3]. We believe that our method maximizes the chance of patient survival and provides a novel option for emergency room physicians.

            Conclusions

            A novel hybrid method that combines TachoComb® sheets with reinforcing sutures was effective in quickly achieving hemostasis without the need for CPB. This represents a substantial advantage in the context of emergency medicine.

            Consent

            Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s family for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

            Declarations

            Acknowledgements

            The authors would like to thank Enago (http://​www.​enago.​com) for the English language review.

            Authors’ Affiliations

            (1)
            Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, New Tokyo Hospital

            References

            1. Iemura J, Oku H, Otaki M, Kitayama H, Inoue T, Kaneda T: Surgical strategy for left ventricular free wall rupture after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg 2001, 71:201–204.PubMedView Article
            2. Lachapelle K, de Varennes B, Ergina PL, Cecere R: Sutureless patch technique for postinfarction left ventricular rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 2002, 74:96–101.PubMedView Article
            3. Muto A, Nishibe T, Kondo Y, Sato M, Yamashita M, Ando M: Sutureless repair with TachoComb sheets for oozing type postinfarction cardiac rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 2005, 79:2143–2145.PubMedView Article
            4. Maisano F, Kjaergard HK, Bauernschmitt R, Pavie A, Rabago G, Laskar M, Marstein JP, Falk V: TachoSil surgical patch versus conventional haemostatic fleece material for control of bleeding in cardiovascular surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009, 36:708–714.PubMedView Article
            5. Fukushima S, Kobayashi J, Tagusari O, Sasako Y: A huge pseudoaneurysm of the left ventricle after simple gluing of an oozing-type postinfarction rupture. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2003, 2:94–96.PubMedView Article
            6. Kimura N, Kawahito K, Murata S, Yamaguchi A, Adachi H, Ino T: Pitfalls of sutureless repair of a blow-out type left ventricular free wall rupture. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005, 53:382–385.PubMedView Article
            7. Reardon MJ, Carr CL, Diamond A, Letsou GV, Safi HJ, Espada R, Baldwin JC: Ischemic left ventricular free wall rupture: prediction, diagnosis, and treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 1997, 64:1509–1613.PubMedView Article
            8. Sutherland FW, Guell FJ, Pathi VL, Naik SK: Postinfarction ventricular free wall rupture: strategies for diagnosis and treatment. Ann Thorac Surg 1996, 61:1281–1285.PubMedView Article
            9. Stiegel M, Zimmern SH, Robicsek F: Left ventricular rupture following coronary occlusion treated by streptokinase infusion: successful surgical repair. Ann Thorac Surg 1987, 44:413–415.PubMedView Article
            10. Sakaguchi G, Komiya T, Tamura N, Kobayashi T: Surgical treatment for postinfarction left ventricular free wall rupture. Ann Thorac Surg 2008, 85:1344–1347.PubMedView Article
            11. Nishizaki K, Seki T, Fujii A, Nishida Y, Funabiki M, Morikawa Y: Sutureless patch repair for small blowout rupture of the left ventricle after myocardial infarction. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 52:268–271.PubMedView Article
            12. Agger P, Langhoff J, Smerup MH, Hasenkam JM: Comparison between TachoComb ® and TachoSil ® for surgical hemostasis in arterial bleeding: an animal experimental study. J Trauma 2010,68(4):838–842.PubMedView Article
            13. Pocar M, Passolunghi D, Bregasi A, Donatelli F: TachoSil ® for postinfarction ventricular free wall rupture. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012, 14:866–867.PubMedView Article
            14. Raffa GM, Tarelli G, Patrini D, Settepani F: Sutureless repair for postinfarction cardiac rupture: a simple approach with a tissue-adhering patch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013,145(2):598–599.PubMedView Article

            Copyright

            © Yamaguchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

            Advertisement