Total ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse presenting in an adult: a case report and review of the literature

  • James Frydman1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Offir Ben-Ishay1 and

      Affiliated with

      • Yoram Kluger1

        Affiliated with

        World Journal of Emergency Surgery20138:37

        DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-8-37

        Received: 5 May 2013

        Accepted: 15 September 2013

        Published: 23 September 2013

        Abstract

        Introduction

        Intussusception is rarely encountered in adults, accounting for just 5% of all occurrences and 1% of bowel obstructions. In up to 90% of episodes of adult intussusceptions, operative intervention is required secondary to pathological lead points. Prior to the current report, only three cases of total ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse in adults have been described in the world literature, making it an important contribution to surgical knowledge. In addition to a discussion of disease etiology, this review outlines sound diagnostic and therapeutic principles in the successful management of this rare emergent surgical condition.

        Case presentation and literature review

        In this case report, we will present a rare case of total ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse in a 22 year-old female without antecedent history. She had both a lead point in the cecum, as well as a highly mobile, intraperitoneal colon. Lead points have been found in only half of the reported cases, including this one. In addition, colonic laxity may enable this phenomenon, being attributed to the loss of zygosis during the embryological period, in which there is persistence of the ascending and descending mesocolons and lack of apposition to the retroperitoneum. The diagnostic work-up, operative strategy and pathological findings are discussed. The three previous cases reported in the English-language medical literature were reviewed.

        Conclusions

        Adult intussusception, while uncommon, may be encountered in an acute surgical setting and optimal outcomes depend on a high index of suspicion and expeditious management. Embryological divergence may contribute to the even rarer variant of total ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse.

        Keywords

        Adult intussusception Rectal prolapse Zygosis

        Introduction

        Intussusception in adults is rare, representing 1% of bowel obstructions and 5% of all intussusceptions [1]. Four categories are recognized, including entero-enteric (small bowel only), colo-colic (large bowel only), ileocolic (terminal ileum within ascending colon), and ileo-cecal (lead point is ileocecal valve) [2]. While intussusception in children is primary and benign, amenable to hydrostatic reduction in 80% of pediatric cases, it is secondary and pathological in up to 90% of adult presentations, requiring resection [2]. Diagnosis in adults is typically established in the operating room (OR) given the predominant symptoms of bowel obstruction. Underlying etiologies include polyps, carcinoma, Meckel's diverticulum, colonic diverticulum and strictures [1, 2]. Total ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse in the adult is a rare emergent surgical condition with only four cases including the current report described in the world literature [35].

        Review

        Case presentation

        A 22 year-old female with history significant only for anemia and no previous surgical history or family history of malignancy complained of abdominal pain and bleeding per rectum. At an outside facility, she was diagnosed with new-onset rectal prolapse which was reduced prior to presentation to our emergency department. On physical examination she was found to have abdominal tenderness without peritoneal signs and evidence of fresh blood on rectal exam without hemorrhoids or prolapse. Rigid proctoscopy confirmed bloody mucosal tissue without a clear source of hemorrhage and no evidence of ischemia. Laboratory values were unremarkable and abdominal films revealed a small bowel obstructive pattern with a paucity of identifiable gas in the colon. (Figure 1) Computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis was subsequently performed with oral and intravenous contrast. An axial tomographic section taken from the abdomen demonstrates the "target" sign (Figure 2) of an extensive ileocolic intussusception, while a more distal section taken from the pelvis reveals the "sausage" sign (Figure 3) of the intussusception extending into the rectum.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-37/MediaObjects/13017_2013_315_Fig1_HTML.jpg
        Figure 1

        Plain abdominal supine radiograph revealing small bowel obstructive pattern with paucity of gas in colon.

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-37/MediaObjects/13017_2013_315_Fig2_HTML.jpg
        Figure 2

        Axial section of abdominal CT revealing "target" sign of ileocolic intussusception in left abdomen.

        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-37/MediaObjects/13017_2013_315_Fig3_HTML.jpg
        Figure 3

        Axial section of pelvic CT revealing "sausage" sign of ileocolic intussusception to level of rectum.

        The CT scan was concerning for total ileocolic intussusception to the level of the rectum with possible compromised bowel. The patient was brought to the OR for an urgent exploratory laparotomy. The distal small bowel was invaginated into the colon throughout its entire length and could be palpated in the upper rectum (Figure 4). The patient had a highly mobile colon with essentially absent flexures, without evidence of malrotation. We elected to proceed with distal to proximal reduction given the fact that a subtotal colectomy would have been mandated without this maneuver. The key technical points in performing this maneuver include localizing the distal aspect of the intussusception and careful milking proximally without undue manual pressure, in order to avoid inadvertant perforation. Success likely hinges on operative exploration early in the pathophysiological process. After successful reduction, a firm rubbery mass was palpated in the cecum. A formal right hemicolectomy was performed, given the risk of potential malignancy. Further exploration revealed a lipomatous mass in the wall of the proximal jejunum and segmental resection was performed. She was discharged home on post-operative day 10. Pathology revealed a fully resected 4 centimeter villous adenoma with foci of high grade dysplasia in the cecum. There was evidence of mucosal edema and lymphostasis in the adjacent colonic tissue. The small bowel specimen revealed ectopic pancreatic tissue. Given the pathological findings in this healthy 22 year-old female, the patient was referred for genetic counseling despite the negative family history, including testing for mutations and endoscopic screening.
        http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1749-7922-8-37/MediaObjects/13017_2013_315_Fig4_HTML.jpg
        Figure 4

        Intraoperative photo revealing total ileocolic intussusception to level of rectum.

        Discussion

        While abdominal pain, nausea and emesis were the predominant presenting symptoms in 78% of patients in one large institutional series, the preoperative diagnosis was correct in only 33% in this same cohort [1].The widespread use of CT has helped to increase preoperative accuracy and can be virtually diagnostic of intussusception given its pathognomonic appearance. When the CT beam is parallel to the longitudinal axis, the intussusception will appear as a "sausage-shaped" mass. However, when the CT beam is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, the intussusception will appear as a "target" mass. Furthermore, eccentric appearing mesenteric fat and vessels are often visible within the intussusception [6].

        Intraoperative strategy in adult intussusception generally favors resection without reduction in adults given the high preponderence of tumoral lesions as lead points. As detailed in this case report, extensive intussusceptions involving the right colon may be selectively considered for careful distal to proximal manual reduction before definitive resection in order to avoid a more extensive resection or two-stage procedure [7]. This should not be attempted, however, when the bowel is ischemic, inflamed or friable as this could result in intraoperative perforation and loss of containment.

        Interestingly, ileocolic intussusception presenting with rectal prolapse is exceedingly rare in adults, with only three cases previously reported in the English-language world literature (Table 1) [35]. David and colleagues describe ileosigmoid intussusception in a 50 year-old male with abdominal distention, constipation and a large mass protruding from the anus for three days. Prior to this presentation, he had diarrhea and a history of recurrent self-limiting episodes of intestinal obstruction. At surgery, he was found to have evidence of gangrenous changes in the intussuscepted ileum. A subtotal colectomy was performed though no pathological lead point on histology was demonstrated [5].
        Table 1

        Reported case of ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse in adults

        Author/Year

        Journal

        Age/Sex

        Operation

        Lead point

        Zygosis

        Frydman (2013)

        World Journal of Emergency Surgery

        22, Female

        Right Hemicolectomy

        Yes, Cecal Villous Adenoma

        No

        Ongom (2013)

        BMC Research Notes

        32, Female

        Right Hemicolectomy

        None

        No

        Chen (2008)

        Cases Journal

        36, Male

        Subtotal Colectomy

        Yes, Ileocecal Submucosal Lipoma

        Yes

        David (2007)

        Indian Journal of enterology

        50, Male

        Subtotal Colectomy

        None

        Yes

        Chen and colleagues describe this presentation in a 36 year-old male who presented with an initial two month history of diarrhea followed by constipation and abdominal pain. While straining to defecate, a mass prolapsed from his anus and he presented for evaluation. His prolapsing mass was reduced but did not relieve his abdominal pain. Barium enema confirmed a filling defect in the sigmoid colon without proximal filling of the colon. At laparotomy, ileosigmoid intussusception was confirmed and could not be reduced, resulting in a subtotal colectomy. Pathology confirmed a 9x6x5 cm benign lipoma at the ileocecal junction [4].

        Ongom and colleagues describe an ileocolic intussusception in a 32 year-old female who initially reported colicky abdominal pain and vomiting, associated with straining during defecation and incomplete evacuation of her rectum. Over the next two weeks prior to presentation, she noted continued colicky abdominal pain, bloody-mucoid discharge and a reducible mass protruding from her anus. On physical examination, an abdominal mass was palpated in the umbilical region and rectal mass noted 3cm proximal to the anal verge. Abdominal ultrasound confirmed the presumptive diagnosis of prolapsed intussusception with partial bowel obstruction. The mass was only able to be partially reduced in a distal to proximal direction and a subsequent right hemicolectomy was performed. The authors noted absence of hepatocolic and splenocolic ligaments and lack of retroperitoneal fixation. Although pathology was negative for neoplasm, they theorized the lack of zygosis with persistent ascending and descending mesocolons helped to enable this presentation [3]. Furthermore, persistent descending mesocolons have been noted in previous reports as the etiology of colonic volvulus [8, 9] and internal hernia [10].

        Thus, two principle factors are causative in this case presentation of total ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse. The first being the lead point pathology of the villous adenoma, and the second being the increased colonic mobility associated with lack of zygosis.

        Conclusions

        Intussusception is an uncommon etiology of bowel obstruction in adults and can be attributed to benign and malignant pathologies. Despite advancements in diagnostic accuracy, a high index of suspicion and clinical acumen is required for timely diagnosis and therapy of this condition in adults. Total ileocolic intussusception with rectal prolapse, found at the end of the adult intussusception spectrum, may be predisposed by an embryological variant lacking zygosis. For the acute care surgeon who may encounter this rare surgical emergency, the diagnosis should be considered in the differential of a prolapsing rectal mass and be expeditiously managed to optimize patient outcomes. Assessing for the absence of zygosis should be an adjunct to the operative procedure as well.

        Consent

        Written infromed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case Report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

        Declarations

        Authors’ Affiliations

        (1)
        Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus

        References

        1. Azar T, Berger DL: Adult intussusception. Ann Surg 1997,226(2):134–138.PubMedView Article
        2. Marinis A, Yiallourou A, Samanides L, et al.: Intussusception of the bowel in adults: A review. World J Gastroenterol 2009,15(4):407–411.PubMedView Article
        3. Ongom PA, Lukande RL, Jombwe J: Anal protrusion of an ileo-colic intussusception in an adult with persistent ascending and descending mesocolons: a case report. BMC Res Notes 2013, 6:42.PubMedView Article
        4. Chen R, Zhao H, Sang X, Mao Y, Lu X, Yang Y: Severe adult ileosigmoid intussusception prolapsing from the rectum: a case report. Cases J 2008, 1:198.PubMedView Article
        5. David AW, Stephen E, Pradhan NR, Nayak S, Perakath B: Adult idiopathic ileosigmoid intussusception prolapsing per rectum. Indian J Gastoenterol 2007,26(1):39–40.
        6. Gayer G, Zissin R, Apter S, Papa M, Hertz M: Adult intussusception – a CT diagnosis. Br J Radiol. 2002, 75:185–190.PubMed
        7. Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM: The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Am J Surg 1997, 173:88–94.PubMedView Article
        8. Chen A, Yang FS, Shih SL, Sheu CY: Case report. Ct diagnosis of volvulus of the descending colong with persistent mesocolon. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003,180(4):1003–6.PubMedView Article
        9. Vyas KC, Joshi CP, Misra S: Volvulus of descending colon with anamolous mesocolon. Indian J Gastroenterol 1997,16(1):34–35.PubMed
        10. Liew KL, Choong CS, Shiau GF, Yang WC, Su CM: Descending mesocolon defect herniation: case report. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi 1999, 22:133–137.PubMed

        Copyright

        © Frydman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

        This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

        Advertisement