Skip to main content

Table 2 Certainty assessment of evidence

From: Self-expanding metal stents versus decompression tubes as a bridge to surgery for patients with obstruction caused by colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Quality assessment

No of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

No of studies

Design

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

SEMS

DT

Relative (95% CI)

Absolute

Technical success

7

Randomised trials

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

250/276 (90.6%)

274/277 (98.9%)

OR 0.13 (0.05 to 0.39)

67 fewer per 1000 (from 16 to 169 fewer)

MODERATE

CRITICAL

Technical success

15

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

618/630 (98.1%)

526/593 (88.7%)

OR 2.55 (1.30 to 5.02)

65 more per 1000 (from 24 to 88 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Clinical success

5

Randomised trials

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

183/210 (87.1%)

200/210 (95.2%)

OR 0.38 (0.16 to 0.88)

69 fewer per 1000 (from 6 to 190 fewer)

MODERATE

CRITICAL

Clinical success

15

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

590/620 (95.2%)

503/583 (86.3%)

OR 3.13 (1.74 to 5.63)

89 more per 1000 (from 53 to 110 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Operation-related perforation

2

Randomised trials

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

1/55 (1.8%)

0/55 (0%)

OR 3.15 (0.12 to 82.16)

-

LOW

IMPORTANT

Operation-related perforation

12

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

11/585 (1.9%)

28/548 (5.1%)

OR 0.51 (0.26 to 0.99)

24 fewer per 1000 (from 0 to 37 fewer)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Operation-related abdominal pain

3

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

8/102 (7.8%)

16/52 (30.8%)

OR 0.16 (0.05 to 0.5)

241 fewer per 1000 (from 126 to 286 fewer)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Device migration

8

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

6/363 (1.7%)

12/375 (3.2%)

OR 0.56 (0.23 to 1.37)

14 fewer per 1000 (from 24 fewer to 11 more)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Intraoperative bleeding

7

Observational studies

Serious1

Serious2

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

255

285

-

MD 37.67 lower (62.73 to 12.6 lower)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Postoperative stoma creation

9

Observational studies

Serious1

Serious2

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

51/462 (11%)

132/498 (26.5%)

OR 0.41 (0.23 to 0.73)

136 fewer per 1000 (from 57 to 188 fewer)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Postoperative hospital stays

13

Observational studies

Serious1

Serious2

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

599

565

-

MD 4.47 lower (6.26 to 2.69 lower)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Postoperative anastomotic leakage

5

Randomised trials

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

3/171 (1.8%)

2/172 (1.2%)

OR 1.61 (0.25 to 10.34)

7 more per 1000 (from 9 fewer to 97 more)

LOW

IMPORTANT

Postoperative anastomotic leakage

13

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

19/585 (3.2%)

20/534 (3.7%)

OR 1.06 (0.57 to 1.98)

2 more per 1000 (from 16 fewer to 34 more)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Postoperative infection

7

Randomised trials

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

10/291 (3.4%)

9/292 (3.1%)

OR 1.15 (0.44 to 2.99)

4 more per 1000 (from 17 fewer to 56 more)

LOW

IMPORTANT

Postoperative infection

8

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

11/246 (4.5%)

15/253 (5.9%)

OR 0.58 (0.26 to 1.29)

24 fewer per 1000 (from 43 fewer to 16 more)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Postoperative 30d mortality

7

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

4/358 (1.1%)

7/410 (1.7%)

OR 0.62 (0.20 to 1.91)

6 fewer per 1000 (from 14 fewer to 15 more)

VERY LOW

CRITICAL

Overall survival

6

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

Serious3

None

151/208 (72.6%)

178/246 (72.4%)

OR 0.91 (0.40 to 2.04)

19 fewer per 1000 (from 212 fewer to 119 more)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Recurrence free

7

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

205/311 (65.9%)

226/368 (61.4%)

RR 1.32 (0.81 to 2.17)

197 more per 1000 (from 117 fewer to 719 more)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Tumor recurrence

4

Observational studies

Serious1

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

24/143 (16.8%)

20/78 (25.6%)

RR 0.47 (0.22 to 0.99)

136 fewer per 1000 (from 3 to 200 fewer)

VERY LOW

IMPORTANT

Tumor metastasis

3

Observational studies

No serious risk of bias

No serious inconsistency

No serious indirectness

No serious imprecision

None

19/117 (16.2%)

12/45 (26.7%)

RR 0.50 (0.16 to 1.62)

133 fewer per 1000 (from 224 fewer to 165 more)

LOW

IMPORTANT

  1. CI Confidence interval, MD mean difference, RR risk ratio