Skip to main content

Table 1 Detailed information on the included studies

From: Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

Year

Country

Included patients

Age

Male (%)

Sonographer

Reference standard

Dumbrava et al. [9]

2023

Ireland, Portugal & Italy

84

50.5

34

Surgeon

RadUS

Zitek et al. [10]

2023

USA

348

48.0

40

Emergency physician

Pathology, HIDA, CT, RadUS

Martin et al. [11]

2022

USA

308

40.3

27

NR*

Pathology

Wehrle et al. [12]

2022

USA

147

37.8

28

Emergency physician

Pathology

Sharif et al. [13]

2021

Canada

577

NR*

NR*

Emergency physician

Pathology, laparoscopy, RadUS, CT

Evans et al. [14]

2021

USA

332

NR*

NR*

Emergency physician

RadUS, final diagnosis

Perez et al.[15]

2021

USA

73

49.7

33

Radiologist

Pathology, PTC fluid, cholangiography

Shaish et al.[16]

2021

USA

319

48

23

Radiologist

Pathology, Clinical follow-up

MacDonald et al. [17]

2020

New Zealand

116

48.0

23

Emergency physician Surgeon

RadUS

Hiatt et al. [18]

2020

USA

2859

41.0

31

Radiologist

Pathology, clinical diagnosis

Tourghabe et al. [19]

2018

Iran

51

42.3

18

Emergency physician Radiologist

Pathology

Wertz et al.[20]

2018

USA

56

66.0

93

Radiologist

Pathology, PTC fluid, Clinical follow-up

Rodriguez et al. [21]

2016

USA

106

44.0

34

Radiologist

Pathology

Naidu et al. [22]

2016

Australia

169

43.0

36

Surgeon

Pathology

Hasani et al. [23]

2015

Iran

150

47.4

56

Emergency physician

Final diagnosis

Hwang et al. [24]

2014

Canada

83

55.5

36

Radiologist

Pathology

Kaoutzanis et al. [25]

2014

USA

360

49.4

34

Radiologist

Pathology

Katirci et al. [26]

2014

Turkey

168

51.7

35

Emergency physician

RadUS

Torres-Macho et al. [27]

2012

Spain

78

67.8

55

Emergency physician

RadUS

Golea et al. [28]

2010

Romania

179

59.3

38

Emergency physician

Pathology

Summers et al. [29]

2010

USA

277

36.0

27

Emergency physician Radiologist

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Al-Azawi et al. [30]

2007

Ireland

70

50.0

17

Radiologist

Pathology

Macciucca et al. [31]

2006

Italy

30

66.6

66

Emergency physician

Pathology

Bingener et al. [32]

2004

USA

55

37.0

15

Radiologist

Pathology

Oh et al.[33]

2003

USA

24

52.8

25

Radiologist

Pathology

Rosen et al. [34]

2001

USA

76

49.0

28

Emergency physician

Clinical follow-up

Kendall et al.[35]

2001

USA

109

39.0

21

Emergency physician

RadUS

HÃ¥kansson et al. [36]

2000

Sweden

35

56.0

51

Radiologist

Surgery, pathology

Chatziioannou et al. [37]

2000

USA

107

57.0

46

NR*

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Juvonen et al.[38]

1992

Finland

129

63.0

47

Radiologist

Pathology

Lauritsen et al. [39]

1988

Denmark

54

66.0

58

NR*

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Soiva et al. [40]

1986

Finland

135

56.0

39

Radiologist

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Martinez et al.[41]

1986

Spain

98

69.0

69

NR*

Pathology

Norrby et al.[42]

1985

Sweden

120

NR*

NR*

Radiologist

Pathology

Samuels et al. [43]

1983

USA

190

NR*

NR*

NR*

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Ralls et al. [44]

1982

USA

54

NR*

NR*

Radiologist

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Freitas et al. [45]

1982

USA

192

NR*

NR*

NR*

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Shuman et al. [46]

1982

USA

74

52.0

63

NR*

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Zeman et al. [47]

1981

USA

144

48.5

38

Radiologist

Pathology, clinical follow-up

Down et al. [48]

1979

Australia

116

46.1

32

NR*

Pathology

  1. *RadUS, radiology ultrasound; NR, not reported; PTC, percutaneous cholecystostomy; HIDA, hepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid scan; CT, computed tomography