Skip to main content

Table 1 Major endpoints of two prospective [11, 12] and twelve retrospective reviews on penetrating buttock injury in acute trauma setting

From: Analytical review of 664 cases of penetrating buttock trauma

Study/reference

Period years

Patients

Male

Mean age

Viscus/major vessel injury

Bony ring injury

Mean ISS

Major surgery*

Overall mortality

Morbidity in survivals

Concominant injuries

Hospital stay†

Cited articles

Contribution/concern

Velmahos et al.[11] (1997)

1

59

58

23

17 (29%)

5 (8%)

-

19(32.2%)

0

3 (15.8%)

High

7.2

11

Clinical examination is very accurate

Velmahos et al.[12] (1998)

1

10

-

-

-

-

-

-

0

-

-

-

14

Clinical examination is a reliable predictor

Maull et al. [13] (1979)

5

15

11

29

6 (54.5%)

-

-

12

0

5 (33%)

0

12

0

Liberal laparotomy advocated

Ivatury et al. [4] (1982)

4

60

57

-

16 (26.7%)

3 (5%)

-

16 (26.7%)

2 (3%)

14 (23%)

-

2 vs 18

3

Aggressive management

Vo et al. [5] (1983)

5

20

18

32

5 (25%)

2 (10%)

-

12 (60%)

0

5 (25%)

10 (50%)

-

2

Bullet's trajectory is important

Fallon et al. [14] (1988)

-

51

43

28.9

16 (31%)

0

-

25 (49%)

0

4 (8%)

High

-

4

Thorough evaluation and all investigations

Gilroy et al. [15] ( 1992)

6

8

7

33

8

-

-

8

2 (25%)

0

0

-

9

Danger of gluteal incision: vessels

Mercer et al. [3] (1992)

6

81

75

26

18 (22%)

4 (5%)

-

26% (21)

1 (1.2%)

-

-

-

6

Two zones of buttock: upper vs lower

Ferraro et al. [16] (1993)

2

70

68

25

34 (49%)

7 (17%)

11(1-45)

34 (49%)

3 (4%)

-

-

-

8

Sigmoidoscopy advocated

DiGiacomo et al. [2] (1994)

3

73

71

-

24 (33%)

10 (14%)

-

27 (37%)

1 (1.4%)

9 (12%)

-

-

10

Transpelvic bullet trajectory: surgery

Makrin et al. [17] (2001)

5

17

17

27

4 (23.5%)

0

-

2 (11.8%)

0

1 (6%)

0

4 (1-16)

5

Upper zone wounds carry higher risk

Susmallian et al. [18](2005)

5

39

38

-

4 (10.5%)

-

-

2 (5.1%)

0

0

0

-

6

Meticulous observation

Ceyran et al.[19] (2009)

17

27

27

-

-

0

-

25 (93%)

3 (11.1%)

1 (4.2%)

0

8 (7 -11)

7

Surgical approach and technique, if needed

Lesperance et.[10] (2009)

1.33

115

113

28

36 (31%)

40 (35%)

13 (1-75)

87 (76%)

7 (6%)

16 (14%)

66 (57%)

-

24

Military surgery experience

Summary

1 - 17

8 - 115

Most

Young

10.5 - 54.5%

0 - 35%

11 - 13

5.1 - 93%

0 - 25%

0 - 33%

High

Long

0 - 24

Dangerous injury/Contingencies possible

  1. *Major surgery: laparotomy, suprapubic cystostomy, massive/operating room gluteal surgery (massive debridement included). †Hospital stay - mean/average. Values in parenthesis are percentages.