Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of studies reporting severity scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

From: Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system

Study details

Statistically significant clinical parameters

Statistically significant radiological parameters

Statistically significant intra-operative parameters

Comments

Vivek et al. Prospective (n = 323)

Male gender, Previous attacks of AC, Previous upper abdominal surgery

Multiple stones Peripancreatic fluid collection

Cirrhotic liver Contracted/distended GB Inflamed GB Ductal anomalies Adhesions

Max score of 44 (with 9 predicting difficult LC), sensitivity of 85% & specificity of 97.8%. ROC of 0.96.

Gupta et al. Prospective (n = 210) All underwent elective LC.

History of previous hospitalization due to AC, Palpable GB

Thickened (≥4 mm) GB wall, Impacted stone

N/A

Min score 0 (easy) Max score 15 (very difficult). Conversion rate 4.28% ROC of 0.86. PPV for easy and difficult LC were 90% and 88% respectively.

Randhawa et al. Prospective (n = 228)

BMI >27.5, Previous hospitalization due to AC, Palpable GB

Thickened (≥4 mm) GB wall

N/A

Conversion rate of 1.31%. ROC of 0.82. PPV for easy and difficult LC were 88.8% and 92.2% respectively.

Kanakala et al. Initially retrospective then prospective (n = 2117)

Male gender, ASA II and III

N/A

N/A

Conversion rate of 6.3%.

Bouarfa et al. Retrospective (n = 337) All underwent elective LC.

Male gender, High BMI

GB wall thickening (>2 mm), GB wall inflammation

N/A

Classification algorithms based on preoperative patient data to predict intraoperative complexity, with an accuracy of 83%.

Kama et al. Retrospective (n = 1000)

Age ≥ 60 (p = 0.052), Male gender, Abdominal tenderness, Previous upper abdominal operation

Thickened GB wall (>4 mm), Previous attacks of AC

N/A

Conversion rate of 4.8%. Both a constant and coefficient were calculated for each parameter; the sum of both gives a score for the patient

Kologlu et al. Prospective (n = 400)

   

This was a validation of the study by Kama et al. using the RSCLO score. Increasing RSCLO scores correlated with higher conversion rates. Conversion rate of 3%.

Lal P et al. Prospective (n = 73) All underwent elective LC.

N/A

GB wall thickness (>4 mm), Contracted GB, Stone impaction at Hartmann’s pouch.

Total operating time (>90mins), Time taken to dissect GB bed/Calot’s triangle (>20 mins), Spillage of stones, Tear of GB during dissection, Conversion to open were chosen as parameters describing a difficult LC.

Conversion rate of 23.3%. PPV of GB thickness, stone impaction and contracted GB to predict conversion to open were 70%, 63.6% and 45.4%, respectively, with a combined overall ultrasonographic PPV of 61.9%.

Schrenk et al. Prospective with 2 arms (n = 640 altogether)

RUQ pain, Rigidity in RUQ, Previous upper abdominal surgery, biliary colic in last 3 weeks, WCC > 10 x 109/L

GB wall thickening (>5 mm), Hydroptic GB, Pericholecystic fluid, Shrunken GB, No GB filling on preoperative IV cholangiography/incarcerated cystic duct stone (on U/S)

N/A

Conversion rate of 8.2%. 5 possible scores, ranging from 0–9 (with 0 = easy LC and ≥4 = conversion to open expected). PPV of 80%.

Rosen et al. Retrospective (n = 1347) undergoing both elective and non-elective LC.

Age, BMI, AC

GB wall thickness

N/A

Conversion rate of 5.3%. For elective LC, BMI >40 and GB wall thickness > 4 mm predicted conversion. For non-elective LC, ASA >2 predicted conversion.

Nachnani et al. Prospective (n = 105)

Male gender, Previous abdominal surgery, BMI > 30, Previous AC/acute pancreatitis

GB wall thickness > 3 mm

N/A

Conversion rate of 11.4%.

Abdel-Baki et al. (n = 40)

N/A

GB wall thickness (≥3 mm), Liver fibrosis

N/A

Conversion rate of 0.42%.

Daradkeh et al. Prospective (n = 160)

N/A

GB wall thickness (>3 mm), CBD diameter (≥7 mm)

N/A

Conversion rate of 2.5%. Adjusted r 2 for U/S parameters was 0.25.

Bulbuller et al. Prospective (n = 571)

N/A

N/A

N/A

Conversion rate of 3.3%. Evaluation of RSCLO score showed good correlation with conversion to open, with a PPV of 43%, NPV of 100%, sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96%.

Kwon et al. Retrospective (n = 305) All patients underwent ERCP and EST prior to LC (acute or elective).

See comments

See comments

See comments

This study evaluated risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients who underwent prior ERCP and EST for choledochocystolithiasis. Cholecystitis, mechanical lithotripsy and ≥ 2 CBD stones predicted open surgery. Conversion rate of 15.7%.

Lipman et al. Retrospective (n = 1377)

Male gender, Elevated WCC (≥11,000/μL), Low serum albumin (<3.5 g/dL), Diabetes Mellitus, Elevated total bilirubin (≥1.5 g/dL)

Pericholecystic fluid

N/A

Conversion rate of 8.1%. ROC of model was 0.83.

  1. AC: acute cholecystitis; LC: laparoscopic cholecystectomy; GB: gallbladder; ASA: American Society of Anaesthesiologists; BMI: body mass index; RUQ: right upper quadrant; WCC: white cell count; ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EST: endoscopic sphincterotomy.