Skip to main content

Table 7 Confidence level comparing pre-training, post-training and post-evaluation

From: Ex-vivo and live animal models are equally effective training for the management of a penetrating cardiac injury

Study group (n = number of participants)

Pre-training

Post-training

Post-evaluation

(n = 31)

(n = 31)

(n = 31)

Ex-vivo

1.7 (0.8)

3.2 (1.0), p = 0.00

3.7 (0.9), p = 0.00

Live tissue

1.9 (1.0)

3.7 (0.7), p = 0.00, p** < .05

3.8 (0.7), p = 0.00

  1. Scores shown are mean (Standard Deviation), using a 5-point Likert scale (range 1–5). P-values shown are comparison with the pre-training questionnaire for each of the two study groups, while p** compares the live tissue and ex-vivo group for the post-training evaluation (Wilcoxon signed-rank test)