Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of participants. Age is described as mean and standard deviation

From: Safety and effectiveness of propranolol in severely burned patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

No.

Study

Group

Total number of randomized patients

Age

TBSA (%) of patients to be included

Country

Socio-demographics

1

Williams 2011 [29]

Propranolol

125

7 (5)

Burns >30%

USA

Not described

Standard care

215

8 (5)

2

W Norbury 2007 [28]

Propranolol

33

Not described

Burns >40%

USA

Not described

Standard care

33

Not described

3

Wurzer 2015 [30]

Propranolol

43

Not described

Burns >30%

USA

Not described

Standard care

39

4

Ali 2014 [21]

Propranolol

21

Not described

Burns >30%

USA

Not described

Standard care

21

5

Komak 2012 [26]

Propranolol

29

Not described

Burns >40%

USA

Not described

Standard care

35

6

Ali 2015 [22]

Propranolol

35

41 (14)

Burns >30%

USA

Not described

Standard care

34

38 (16)

7

Herndon 2012 [24]

Propranolol

90

7 (5)

Burns >30%

USA

Majority of participants were Hispanic: 97% in the control group and 91% in the propranolol group

Standard care

89

7 (5)

8

Akbar Mohammadi 2009 [27]

Propranolol

37

27.21 (9.73)

Burns 20–50%

Iran

Not described

Standard care

42

24.54 (12.06)

9

Jeschke 2007 [25]

Propranolol

102

7.2 (0.6)

Burns >40%

USA

Not described

Standard care

143

7.8 (0.4)

10

Herndon 2001 [23]

Propranolol

12

6.6 (1.5)

Burns >40%

USA

Not described

Standard care

12

7.8 (1.4)