Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic data of patients who underwent emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy for non-traumatic etiologies in our series

From: The impact of preoperative etiology on emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy for non-traumatic patients

Sex/age/indication

Cancer

Procedure/blood loss (ml)

APACHE II score/BMI/Hb (g/dL)/albumin (g/dL)

Complication/grading

Death

Hospital stay (days)

M/70/internal bleeding after partial pancreatectomy

No

CW/1000

17/18.6/13.6/4.9

Bile leakage/2

No

109

M/49/bleeding duodenal lymphoma

Lymphoma

CW/20

16/20.1/11/2.2

P-duct leakage with Peritonitis/3

No

54

F/78/A-loop perforation after ERCP

GC

CW/400

12/21.3/9.4/3.3

MOF/4

Yesa

16

F/58/A-loop obstruction and perforation

No

CW/500

6/17.3/11.9/3.2

Retro-peritoneal infection/3

No

17

M/32/bowel ischemia

No

CW/2850

19/24.3/11.3/1.9

Septic shock with liver and renal failure/5

Yes

11

F/39/duodenal ulcer bleeding

No

CW/1000

17/19.5/4.5/2.2

Wound infection/2

No

40

53.5

 

750

16.5/19.8/11.2/2.7

  

28.5

  1. ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, GC gastric cancer, CW classic Whipple’s operation, BMI body mass index, MOF multi-organ failure
  2. aThe patient had been discharged and died of complications of MOF 8 months after initial EPD