Table 2 ICP monitoring during EES
From: Preserve encephalus in surgery of trauma: online survey. (P.E.S.T.O)
|  | Respondents (n = 122) |
|---|---|
ICP insertion | |
 Neurosurgeon (attending) | 47 (39%) |
 Neurosurgeon (resident) | 38 (31%) |
 Neurosurgeon (attending + resident) | 32 (26%) |
 Emergency surgeon (attending) | 1 (1%) |
 Emergency surgeon (attending) + neurosurgeon (attending) | 1 (1%) |
 Other | 3 (2%) |
ICP monitoring in patients (%) at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
 0% | 15 (13%) |
 < 10% | 21 (17%) |
 10–30% | 35 (29%) |
 30–50% | 4 (3%) |
 50–70% | 15 (12%) |
 70–99% | 23 (19%) |
 100% | 9 (7%) |
Protocol for ICP monitoring in patients at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
 Yes | 48 (39%) |
 No | 74 (61%) |
Importance of ICP monitoring in patients at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
 Not important | 1 (1%) |
 Somewhat important | 19 (15%) |
 Important | 40 (33%) |
 Very important | 46 (38%) |
 Mandatory | 16 (13%) |