Table 5 Factors associated with overall video quality based on senior surgeon assessment
Moderate/good quality videos (n = 13) | Poor quality videos (n = 12) | p value Binary logistic regression | Odds ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of visualizations [median(range)] | 35,362 (9091–4,183,318) | 14,228 (6500–74,728) | 0.148 | |
Number of days online [median(range)] | 1672 (574–2637) | 2025.5 (395–2767) | 0.552 | |
Length (min) [median(range)] | 6.45 (3.33–24.14) | 5.14 (1.34–27.30) | 0.494 | |
Number of comments [median(range)] | 27 (0–457) | 3 (1–30) | 0.074 | |
Number of likes [median(range)] | 124 (15–1941) | 26.5 (9–107) | 0.019 | 1.029 (1.00–1.05) |
Number of dislikes [median(range)] | 10 (0–181) | 5 (0–16) | 0.170 | |
CVS score ≥ 5 [n (%)]* | 10 (76.9) | 5 (41.7) | 0.111 | |
GOALS score ≥ 20 [n (%)]* | 8 (61.5) | 6 (50) | 0.695 | |
Utility score [mean(SD)] | 2.51 (0.68) | 1.27 (0.58) | 0.006 | 2.50 (2.35–17.95) |
LAP-VEGaS conformity (%)[mean(SD)] | 12.89 (4.95) | 6.76 (2.44) | 0.014 | 1.15 (1.08–2.11) |
Presence of audio/written commentary | 10 (76.9) | 3 (25) | 0.014 | 3 (1.59–6.5) |
Description of preoperative data [n (%)] | 5 (38.5) | 0 | 0.999 | |
Image quality | 0.364 | |||
• Good | 6(46.2) | 3 (25) | ||
• Poor | 3(32.1) | 6 (50) | ||
• High definition | 4(38.8) | 3 (25) |