Skip to main content

Table 3 Management of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries

From: Non-operative management of blunt hepatic and splenic injury: a time-trend and outcome analysis over a period of 17 years

 

Overall cohort (2000–2016)

n = 731

Early period (2000–2008)

n = 372

Late period (2009–2016)

n = 359

Difference between periods

P

Primary therapy

 OM

127 (17.4%)

69 (18.5%)

58 (16.2%)

0.393

 NOM

604 (82.6%)

303 (81.5%)

301 (83.8%)

NOM rate according to the injured organ

 NOM splenic injury

201 (71.8%)

85 (69.1%)

116 (73.9%)

0.378

 NOM hepatic injury

344 (93.5%)

177 (92.2%)

167 (94.9%)

0.295

 NOM combined splenic and hepatic injury

59 (71.1%)

41 (71.9%)

18 (69.2%)

0.801

Surgical procedures (% of all patients)

 Spleen

  Complete splenectomy

79 (10.8%)

41 (11%)

38 (10.6%)

0.966

  Spleen-conserving procedures (suture, hemostasis, etc.)

17 (2.3%)

9 (2.4%)

8 (2.2%)

Liver

 Hepatic partial resection

8 (1.1%)

5 (1.3%)

3 (0.8%)

0.113

 Liver-conserving procedure (suture, hemostasis, etc.)

34 (4.7%)

23 (6.2%)

11 (3.1%)

Angiography or ERCP in case of primary NOM

9 (1.2%)

2 (0.5%)

7 (2.0%)

0.194

Failure NOM (secondary operative, % of NOM)

20 (3.3%)

11 (3.6%)

9 (3%)

0.515

Cause for the failure of NOM (% of all NOM)

 Persistent or secondary bleeding/hemodynamic instability

13 (65%)

5 (45.5%)

8 (88.9%)

0.123

 Extent of intra-abdominal hematoma (compression/compartment)

5 (25%)

4 (36.4%)

1 (11.1%)

 Infectious complications (bile duct injury, sepsis, MOF)

2 (10%)

3 (18.2%)

0 (0%)

Management of failed NOM (% of all failed NOM)

 Splenectomy

11 (55%)

5 (45.5%)

6 (66.7%)

0.517

 Spleen-conserving surgery

2 (10%)

2 (18.2%)

0 (0%)

 Liver resection

3 (15%)

1 (9.1%)

2 (22.2%)

 Non-resection liver surgery (suture, hemostatics, etc.)

4 (20%)

3 (27.3%)

1 (11.1%)

  1. OM operative management, NOM non-operative management, ERCP endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, SD standard deviation, MOF multiorgan failure