Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical and surgical outcome of patients with isolated acetabular fractures (group C) and with a combined acetabular/abdominal injury (group D). Group D patients underwent significantly more often an emergency stabilization of the acetabular fracture. Definitive surgery was not different in both groups but the patients in group D were later operated. While the patients in group D were treated significantly longer and had a higher overall complication rate, there was no difference regarding the osteosynthesis-associated complications

From: Associated abdominal injuries do not influence quality of care in pelvic fractures—a multicenter cohort study from the German Pelvic Registry

 

Group C

Group D

p value

Number (n)

1.898

397

 

Duration of surgery (min)

176 ± 81 [60–760]

198 ± 104 [60–723]

< 0.001#

Blood loss (ml)

600 ± 511 [100–3000]

660 ± 514 [100–3000]

0.46

Step preoperatively (mm)

7.6 ± 8.1 [0–160]

8.0 ± 13.8 [0–160]

0.01#

Step postoperatively (mm)

1.2 ± 2.5 [0–33]

1.1 ± 2.2 [0–25]

0.28

Quality of reduction by Matta score

  

0.39

Grade 1: 0–2 mm residual step (anatomical)

84.0 % (982)

85.3 % (221)

 

Grade 2: 2–3 mm residual step (imperfect)

4.9 % (57)

6.6 % (17)

 

Grade 3: > 3 mm residual step (poor)

8.5 % (100)

6.2 % (16)

 

No postoperative data available

2.6 % (30)

1.9 % (5)

 
  1. *Mann-Whitney U test (isolated acetabular fracture vs. combined injury)
  2. #Student’s t test (isolated acetabular fracture vs. combined injury)