Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the included studies (RCT randomized controlled trial, SSI surgical site infection, iNPWT negative pressure wound therapy, SD standard dressing, Cht chemotherapy, BMI body mass index, IFX infliximab)

From: Surgical site infection prevention and management in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review of the literature

Topic

Author

Year

Study type

Intervention

Setting

Number of patients

N. of IP

Results

Transplanted patients

Dean P.G.

2004

RCT

Sirolimus vs tacrolimus

Kidney transplant

123

All

Higher rate of SSI in sirolimus

Siskind E.

2012

Prospective

Partial incision closure

Kidney transplant

104

All

No SSI

Shahrestani S.

2018

Meta-analysis

Sirolimus, BMI, different surgical incisions

Kidney and pancreas transplant

17821

All

Higher rate of hernia in sirolimus

Gurusamy

2014

Review of RCTs

Bowel decontamination, Pre- and probiotics, G-CSF

Liver transplant

614

All

No difference in SSI or complication rate

Shrestha M.S.

2016

Systematic review

NPWT for complication

Kidney transplant

22

All

Heterogeneous

D’Souza K.

2019

Syst rev. of retrospective

Drain vs. no drain

Kidney transplant

1640

All

No difference in SSI or complication rate

Berry

2019

RCT

72 h-long antibiotic prophylaxis vs intraoperatory antibiotic alone

Liver transplant

97

All

Colorectal cancer

Kabbinavar F.

2005

RCT

CHT +/− bevacizumab

Metastatic colorectal cancer

209

All

/

Hurvitz H.

2004

RCT

CHT +/− bevacizumab

Metastatic colorectal cancer

813

All

/

Scappaticci F.A.

2005

Pooled data from RCT

CHT +/− bevacizumab

Metastatic colorectal cancer

1132

All

SSI: 13% BZ+CH vs 3.4% CH alone

Curran T.

2018

Retrospective

iNPWT vs SD

High-risk open colorectal surgery

315

61 (chronic steroid/metastatic cancer)

SSI: 7% iNPWT vs 15% SD

Crohn disease

Bafford A.C.

2013

Retrospective

Patients on immunomodulatory therapy

Crohn disease

196

127 (on drugs)

Same rate of SSI

Canedo J.

2010

Retrospective

Patients on IFX, other drugs or assuming no drugs

Crohn disease

225

150 (IFX or other drugs)

No difference in SSI

Trauma

Costa M.L.

2020

RCT

iNPWT vs SD

High-risk patients

1629

Not specified

No difference in SSI rate

Masden D.

2012

RCT

iNPWT vs SD

High-risk patients

81

7

No difference in SSI rate

Mixed High-risk population

BlackHam A.U.

2013

Retrospective

iNPWT vs SD

Abdominal oncological surgery

191

76 (neoadjuvant cht)

SSI: 6.7% iNPWT vs 19.5% SD

Javed A.A.

2019

RCT

iNPWT vs SD

High-risk pancreatico-duodenectomy

123

77 (neoadjuvant cht)

SSI: iNPWT 9% vs 31.1% SD

Murphy P.B.

2019

RCT

iNPWT vs SD

Open colorectal

288

9

No difference in SSI rate

O’Leary D.P.

2017

RCT

iNPWT vs SD

Abdominal surgery

49

Not specified

SSI: iNPWT 8.3% vs 32% SD

Li P.-Y.

2017

RCT

iNPWT vs SD

Abdominal, colorectal surgery

71

Not specified

SSI: iNPWT 3% vs 23.7% SD

Shen P.

2017

RCT

iNPWT vs SD

Abdominal, oncological surgery

265

Excluded

No difference in SSI rate

Mixed High-risk population

Strugala and Martin

2017

Meta-analysis (RCT + observational)

iNPWT vs SD

All specialities

1863

Not specified

SSI: iNPWT 4.8% vs 9.7% SD

Zwanenburg P.R.

2019

Meta-analysis (RCT + observational but only RCT reported)

iNPWT vs SD

All specialities + subgroup analysis

4398

Not specified

No advantage in NPWT if stratified for surgical specialties

Kuper T.M.

2020

Meta-analysis of RCTs

iNPWT vs SD

Open abdominal

792

Not specified

No difference in SSI rate

Sahebally S.

2018

Meta-analysis (RCT + observational)

iNPWT vs SD

Open abdominal

1187

Not specified

NPWT > SD pooled OR 0.25