Study | Setting | Population | Intervention | Comparison | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brenner 2018 [23] Prospective observational | Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) study was approved by the American Association for the Surgery | Adult trauma and acute care surgery (age ≥ 18) patients undergoing aortic occlusion (AO) in the acute phases after injury were enrolled Blunt trauma was common (58.6% of which 83% REBOA group and 48.5% RT) ISS: mean 38.2 (SD:18.9) | REBOA (n = 83) Unclear modality of intervention (full/partial)* | RT (n = 202) | In-hospital mortality, complication, units packed red blood cells, units fresh frozen plasma, health-related quality of life (neurologic outcomes: Glasgow Coma Outcomes Score) |
Aso 2017 [22] Retrospective cohort study | Data from a national inpatient database in Japan | Trauma patients with uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock (n = 259); penetrating thoracic injuries were excluded Blunt trauma (100%) ISS: missing information | REBOA (n = 191) Unclear modality of intervention (full/partial) | RT (n = 68) | In-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days (VFDs), intensive care unit (ICU)-free days, total amount of fluid infusion within 1 day after admission (mL), total amount of transfusion within 1 day after admission (mL), total hospitalization costs |
Abe 2016 [21] Retrospective cohort study | Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) nationwide trauma registry | Trauma patients (n = 903) Blunt trauma was common (838/895; 93.6%) ISS: mean 34 (SD:25); mean 34 (SD:20) | REBOA (n = 636) Unclear modality of intervention (full/partial) | Resuscitative open aortic cross-clamping (RT) (n = 267) | In-hospital mortality, ED mortality, blood transfusion |
DuBose 2016 [24] Prospective observational | Multicentre data from Trauma and Acute Care Surgery registry (8 American College of Surgeons level I centres) | Adult trauma and acute care surgery (age ≥ 18) patients undergoing aortic occlusion (AO) in the acute phases after injury (n = 114) Blunt trauma (62.3%) ISS: median 31.0(IQR: 30); median 31.5 (IQR: 22) | REBOA (n = 46) Unclear modality of intervention (full/partial) | AO (n = 68) | Haemodynamic stability, Improvement in haemodynamic red blood cell requirements, in-hospital mortality, ED mortality, Complications, health-related quality of life (neurologic outcomes: Glasgow Coma Outcomes Score) |
Moore 2015 [29] Retrospective cohort study | Trauma registry from two Level 1 trauma Centres (Texas and Maryland-Baltimore) | Trauma patients in NCTH (n = 96) Blunt trauma (44.4% RT; 66.7% REBOA) ISS: median 34 (IQR:27–59); median 28 (IQR:17–43) | REBOA (n = 24) Unclear modality of intervention (full/partial) | RT (n = 72) | In-hospital mortality, ED mortality |
Matsumara 2017* Retrospective cohort study | DIRECT-IABO Registry has been conducted by the Academic Committee in DIRECT in Japan | Trauma patients with refractory haemorrhagic shock Blunt trauma (96%) ISS: median 36 (IQR: 28–50); 44 (IQR: 38–59) | REBOA (n = 76) Partial occlusion (70% of participants) * | RT + REBOA group (n = 30) | In-hospital mortality |
Nori 2015 [31] Retrospective cohort study | Japan Trauma Data Bank | Critically uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock limited to blunt trauma patients. Blunt trauma (100%) ISS: mean 32.4 (SD:16.4) | REBOA (n = 351) Unclear modality of intervention (full/partial) | Control group (n = 1456) | In-hospital mortality, health-related quality of life (neurologic outcomes: Glasgow Coma Outcomes Score) |
GarcÃa 2020 [25] Retrospective cohort study | Clinical records at Fundación Valle del Lili University hospital in Cali, Colombia level-I trauma centre from Colombia | Patients with torso trauma who underwent surgical intervention for haemorrhage control excluded blunt trauma. Penetrating trauma (100%) ISS: median 25 (IQR: 16–25) | REBOA (n = 28) Partial occlusion* | Control group (n = 317) | In-hospital mortality, PRBCs A in first 6 h , Plasma A in first 6 h, platelet A in first 6 h, Cryo A in first 6 h , Crystalloids in first 24 h, Thoracic damage control, Abdominal damage control, complications |
Inoue 2016 [26] Retrospective cohort study | Japan Trauma Data Bank | Patients with severe torso trauma Blunt trauma (93.8%) ISS: median 35 (IQR: 25–50); median 36 (IQR: 25–50) | REBOA (n = 625) Unclear modality of intervention* | Control group (n = 625) | In-hospital mortality, ED mortality |
Joseph 2019 [27] Retrospective case-control study | ACSTQIP database and identified all patients who received REBOA within 1 h of admission | Trauma patients after REBOA placement Blunt trauma (95%) ISS: median 28 (IQR:17–35); median 29 (IQR: 18–38) | REBOA (n = 140) Unclear modality of intervention* | Control group (n = 280) | In-hospital mortality, ED mortality, transfusion requirements at 4 h and 24 h after injury, in-hospital complications (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, extremity compartment syndrome, health-related quality of life (neurologic outcomes: Glasgow Coma Outcomes Score) |
Yamamoto 2019 [30] Retrospective cohort study | Japan Trauma Data Bank | Severely injured patients Blunt trauma (96% REBOA; 94% controls) ISS: mean 35 (SD: 13); 33 (SD: 11) | REBOA (n = 117) | Control group (n = 117) | Survival at 28 days, a composite of in-hospital death, transfusion in number of patients |