Table 3 Studies with selective surgical documentation review
Author | Year | Country | Study design | Main selective area |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Balla | 2018 | Italy | Prospective | Grade of biliary anatomy injury |
Bolivar-Rodriguez | 2018 | Mexico | Prospective | Imaging biliary anatomy |
Booij | 2018 | The Netherlands | Retrospective | Operation note accuracy |
Buddingh | 2011 | The Netherlands | Prospective | Biliary anatomy documentation |
Cho | 2017 | Korea | Prospective | Grading of biliary anatomy injury |
Eryigit | 2020 | The Netherlands | Prospective | Audio and video recording of cholecystectomy |
Fingerhut | 2013 | The Netherlands | Prospective | Common bile duct injury grading system |
Griffiths | 2019 | UK | Prospective | Grade of cholecystitis |
Lam | 2014 | Australia | Prospective | Imaging biliary anatomy |
Loukas | 2018 | Greece | Prospective | Procedure video documentation |
Nassar | 2020 | UK | Prospective | Pre-operative risk scoring |
Sakowska | 2016 | New Zealand | Prospective | Digitalized hospital workflow system |
Sanford | 2014 | USA | Prospective | Imaging biliary anatomy |
Sebastian | 2021 | Poland | Prospective | Imaging biliary anatomy |
Siada | 2019 | USA | Retrospective | Grade of cholecystitis |
Sugrue | 2015 | Global | Prospective | Grade of cholecystitis |
Sugrue | 2019 | Global | Prospective | Grade of cholecystitis |
Tullavardhana | 2016 | Thailand | Retrospective | Video and photo documentation of anatomy |
Vivek | 2014 | India | Prospective | Grade of operative difficulty |