Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of detailed information about the included studies

From: Efficacy of intraosseous access for trauma resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author, year

Study design

Research period

Country

Patient type

Sample size

Total (I/C)

Age (years)

Total (I/C)

Sex (Male%)

Jixin et al. [17]

RCT

2001.01–2006.05

China

Hemorrhagic shock

268 (127/141)

16–45

(/)

100%

100%/100%

James et al. [14]

Prospective cohort study

2008.6.15–2008.8.15

USA

Shock

92 (30/62)

/

46.9/56.2/50.8

/

63.3%/53.2%

Yun et al. [16]

Retrospective cohort study

2008.1–2011.6

China

Traffic injury

120 (60/60)

39 ± 12

(/)

70.10%

(/)

Chong et al. [15]

RCT

2006.01–2008.01

China

Trauma and shock

32 (16/16)

/

33.9 ± 5.3/33.1 ± 6.0

61.70%

(/)

Peter et al. [18]

Prospective

cohort study

2012.2–2013.7

USA

MET calls

79 (31/48)

/

/

Yan-yan et al. [13]

RCT

2017.4.1–2018.12.31

China

Shock

96 (48/48)

20–95 (65.6 ± 17.1)

65.63%

/

Yinxue et al. [19]

RCT

2018.12–2020.10

China

Hemorrhagic shock caused by trauma and burn

80 (40/40)

/

53.1 ± 3.4/53.2 ± 3.3

66.3%

67.5%/65.0%

Yin-e et al. [20]

RCT

2019.9–2021.5

China

Hemorrhagic shock caused by trauma and traffic injury

72 (36/36)

/

39.5 ± 4.2/40.2 ± 5.6

56.9%

55.6%/58.3%

  1. IQR Interquartile range, RCT Randomized controlled trial, USA United States, I/C intervention group/comparison group