Cecum cancer underlying appendicular abscess. Case report and review of literature

  • Irene Fiume1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Vincenzo Napolitano1,

      Affiliated with

      • Gianmattia Del Genio1,

        Affiliated with

        • Alfredo Allaria1 and

          Affiliated with

          • Alberto Del Genio1

            Affiliated with

            World Journal of Emergency Surgery20061:11

            DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-1-11

            Received: 07 February 2006

            Accepted: 04 April 2006

            Published: 04 April 2006


            Peri-appendicular abscess is usually due to primary appendicitis or it may be caused by various pathological conditions: inflammatory, infective, neoplastic, immunological, ischemic, occlusive (table 1).
            Table 1

            Causes of appendicitis


            Idiopathic lymphatic hyperplasia

            Fecalith obstruction



            Crohn's disease

            Ulcerative Colitis


            Granulomatous appendicitis


            Bacterial (Tuberculosis, Typhus, Actinomycosis, E. coli and B. fragilis, Pseudomonas, Yersinia, Eikenella corrodens infections)

            Viral (Adenovirus, Cytomegalovirus infections)

            Fungal (Aspergillosis, Histoplasmosis)

            Parasitic (Enterobius vermicularis, Strongyloides stercoralis, Entamoeba histolytica infections, Ascariasis, Schistosomiasis, Cryptosporidiosis, Taeniasis)


            Primary neoplasm (Adenoma, Mucinous cystadenomas, Cystadeno-carcinomas, Carcinoid tumors, Mesenchymal tumors)

            Metastasis from other organs (stomach, lung, femal genital tract)




            Vascular occlusion for thrombosis, vasculitis


            Neural proliferations and/or increased number of endocrine cells

            Foreign body obstruction

            Small chicken and fish bones, portion of wire, nail, cherry stone, piece of glass, dislocated intrauterine contraceptive device, dislocated biliary stent

            We present a case of right iliac fossa abscess, initially diagnosed as a complication of acute appendicitis that, at surgical exploration, was proven to be produced by a cecal tumour causing appendicitis for an obstructive mechanism.

            Case report

            A 63-year-old male patient in reasonably good health suddenly suffered from fever (>38°C) and a painful right iliac fossa tumefaction; no other gastrointestinal problems were noted. On clinical examination, a mass of about 5 cm was palpable in correspondence of right iliac fossa and appeared hard, not reducible and fixed to the parietal muscle.

            Laboratory data showed mild anaemia (haemoglobin: 10.7 g/dl, hematocrit: 31%) and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (74 mm/hr) as pathological findings. Alvarado score was 6 and therefore a parenteral antimicrobial therapy was administered.

            Abdominal ultrasound examination evidenced an abscess in the right lower quadrant, with heterogenic echotexture and a thickening of the ileocecal tract. Abdominal computerized tomography (CT), confirmed the presence of a complex, predominantly cystic, mass of large size (6 × 8 cm) with heterogeneous, mainly peripheral enhancement (figure 1). The adjacent cecum had its wall thickened and it was not possible to differentiate the appendix separately from the mass. Homolateral inguinal reactive lymphadenopathy was also present. The patient failed to respond to the initial conservative management, which consisted of intravenous fluids and triple antibiotic therapy with cefotaxime, gentamicin and metronidazole, without any improvement of pain and fever. At a further ultrasound examination, the mass appeared not modified.
            Figure 1

            Abdomino-pelvic CT scan reveals a 6 × 8 cm right iliac fossa abscess with a remarkable wall thickening of the adjacent cecum.

            Because of worsening abdominal pain and clinical signs of right iliac fossa peritonitis, the patient was not submitted to contrast enema and colonoscopy to avoid the risk of extensive peritoneal contamination for abscess rupture or exacerbation of bowel perforation with severe diffuse peritonitis and was directly operated on.

            Surgical procedure

            Exploratory laparotomy revealed a voluminous cecal mass fixed to the abdominal wall, covering a purulent, loculated abscess cavity that was copiously irrigated and drained. A thick and dilated appendix was finally evidenced strictly adherent to the cecal mass that appeared quite suspicious. Careful inspection of liver, spleen, peritoneal cavity and mesentery was done. The lesion was considered resectable and a right-sided hemicolectomy was performed.


            Gross examination of the resected specimen showed an ileocecal valve tumour with ulcerated aspect extending to the fundus of cecum. The histopathology revealed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma invading the muscularis propria. No metastatic lymph nodes were found (B2 stage in the Astler-Coller classification). Resection margins were free. Marked peri-appendiceal inflammation significant for appendiceal perforation was evidenced. Appendicitis and perforation originated from chronic obstruction of the base of appendix caused by the cecal neoplasm.

            The patient underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and levo-folinic acid. At a 6 month follow-up no sign of recurrence was evidenced.


            Pathophysiologically, the relations between cecum cancer and appendicular abscess may be the followings: 1) cecum cancer and appendicular abscess may be two co-existing and independent affections, 2) cecal neoplastic lesion may cause appendicitis by mechanical obstruction at the orifice of the vermiform appendix, 3) adenocarcinoma of cecum may present clinically as appendiceal abscess due to transmural invasion with perforation.

            Colonic perforation due to carcinoma may occur at the tumour, either proximal or distal to the neoplastic lesion [1]. The perforation may be due to transmural invasion of the neoplasia or to obstructive mechanism. In the case we describe, the perforation occurred distal to the cancer, in correspondence of the appendix. The spreading ileocecal valve neoplasia reached the orifice of the appendix and caused the appendiceal occlusion and perforation.

            Patients with perforated cancer are at risk of diffusion of cancer cells within the abdomen and pelvis and consequently of peritoneal carcinomatosis [2]. However, different clinical reports show that the presence of perforation doesn't necessarily predispose a poor prognosis and long-term survivals depend on tumour stages without significant difference between perforated and uncomplicated cancers [35]. Although the site of perforation doesn't appear to impact the 5-year survival, a few Authors describe a worse long-term outcome related to perforation proximal to a cancer [1, 6].

            Sonography and computed tomography show a high degree of accuracy in detecting the presence of an abscess [7]. The radiologic appearance of cecal wall thickening associated with an abscess may indicate an involvement of cecum that may be primary (diverticulitis, inflammatory diseases, neoplasia, infections) or secondary to appendicitis.

            Preoperative colonoscopy in presence of cecal abscess and inflammation may be hazardous and be at risk of complications such as diffuse peritonitis for abscess rupture or exacerbation of bowel perforation, development of liver abscess [810]. Also barium enema, commonly used in the past, it is no longer recommended because of the risk of extravasation of contrast material if perforation has occurred [9].

            The treatment of appendiceal abscesses is still discussed and many different approaches are nowadays adopted. Expectant management, consisting of intravenous antibiotics, percutaneous drainage and interval appendectomy at a later date, is gaining a wide consent as it seems associated with less morbidity and shorter overall hospital stay [11, 12]. However, malignancy is a substantial risk in elderly patients. Carcinoma masquerading as appendicitis occurs more often than is generally realized and will be seen more frequently as aging population increases [13]. The percentage of patients presenting with appendicitis that also have colonic carcinomas is ranging from 1, 8 to 8% according various Authors [1416].

            Therefore, an aggressive surgical approach of cecal masses, with intra-operative abscess drainage and resection should be performed in selected cases to avoid the risk of delaying the diagnosis and unrecognising malignant lesion as well as to achieve a safe and adequate treatment [17]. Careful intraoperative assessment, including evaluation of the tract of the bowel involved by the inflammation, inspection and palpation of the liver, resection and examination of the specimen is essential to identify malignancy [16]. In the suspect of neoplastic lesion of cecum or appendix, right hemicolectomy is the procedure of choice to make a correct diagnosis and to avoid the risk of leaving residual tissue [16, 18].

            Authors’ Affiliations

            First Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second University of Naples


            1. Khan S, Pawlak SE, Eggenberger JC, Lee CS, Szilagy EJ, Margolin DA: Acute colonic perforation associated with colorectal cancer. Am Surg 2001,67(3):261–264.PubMed
            2. Sugarbaker PH: Successful management of microscopic residual disease in large bowel cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999,43(Suppl):S15–25.View ArticlePubMed
            3. Cerame MA: A 25-year review of adenocarcinoma of the appendix. A frequently perforating carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1988,31(2):145–150.View ArticlePubMed
            4. Kriwanek S, Armbruster C, Dittrich K, Beckerhinn P: Perforated colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1996,39(12):1409–1414.View ArticlePubMed
            5. Alcobendas F, Jorba R, Poves I, Busquets J, Engel A, Jaurrieta E: Perforated colonic cancer. Evolution and prognosis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2000,92(5):326–333.PubMed
            6. Chen HS, Sheen-Chen SM: Obstruction and perforation in colorectal adenocarcinoma: an analysis of prognosis and current trends. Surgery 2000,127(4):370–376.View ArticlePubMed
            7. Albiston E: The role of radiological imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Can J Gastroenterol 2002,16(7):451–463.PubMed
            8. Williams CB, Lane RH, Sakai Y: Colonoscopy: an air-pressure hazard. Lancet 1973, 2:729.View ArticlePubMed
            9. Salzman H, Lillie D: Diverticular disease: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 2005,72(7):1229–1234.PubMed
            10. Wells CD, Balan V, Smilack JD: Pyogenic liver abscess after colonoscopy in a patient with ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005,3(12):24.View Article
            11. Brown CV, Abrishami M, Muller M, Velmahos GC: Appendiceal abscess: immediate operation or percutaneous drainage? Am Surg 2003,69(10):829–832.PubMed
            12. Lasson A, Lundagards J, Loren I, Nilsson PE: Appendiceal abscesses: primary percutaneous drainage and selective interval appendicectomy. Eur J Surg 2002,168(5):264–269.View ArticlePubMed
            13. Peck JJ: Management of carcinoma discovered unexpectedly at operation for acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 1988,155(5):683–685.View ArticlePubMed
            14. Bizer LS: Acute appendicitis is rarely the initial presentation of cecal cancer in the elderly patient. J Surg Oncol 1993,54(1):45–46.View ArticlePubMed
            15. Bleker RJ, Wereldsma JC: Colonic malignancy mimicking an appendiceal mass. Neth J Surg 1989,41(2):42–46.PubMed
            16. Poon RT, Chu KW: Inflammatory cecal masses in patients presenting with appendicitis. World J Surg 1999,23(7):713–716.View ArticlePubMed
            17. Zarba Meli E, Mazzocchi P, Lepiane P, Dalsasso G, Giacovazzo F, Salvio A, De Luca A, Lomanto D, Basoli A, Speranza V: The role of surgery in the treatment of appendicular abscesses. Minerva Chir 1997,52(5):577–581.PubMed
            18. Cirocco WC: Right hemicolectomy remains the treatment of choice for adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Gastrointest Endosc 2005,61(6):791.View ArticlePubMed


            © Irene et al. 2006

            This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.