Skip to main content

Table 1 Previously reported series of peritonitis

From: Peritonitis – the Eastern experience

Author [Ref]

Total Cases

Gastroduodenal Perforations n (%)

Small bowel Perforations n (%)

Appendicular Perforations n (%)

Colorectal Perforations n (%)

Mortality

Quereshi 2005[16]

126

31 (24.6)

37 (29.4)

12 (9.5)

3 (2.4)

15%

Khan 2004[11]

54

21 (38.8)

14 (25.9)

6 (11.1)

4 (7.4)

NA

Nishida 2002*[15]

229

92 (40.2)

71 (31)

0

66 (28.8)

13.1%

Chen 2000[14]

98

57 (58.1)

6 (6.1)

13 (13.2)

14 (14.3)

NA

Dorairajan 1995[2]

250

80 (32)

103 (41.2)

38 (15.2)

5 (2)

9.2%

Shreshtha 1993[12]

80

26 (32.5)

15 (18.7)

27 (33.7)

0

9.6%

Tripathi 1993[3]

160

24 (15)

57 (35.6)

16 (10)

NA

23.7%

Dandpat 1991[4]

340

276 (81.1)

34 (10)

22 (6.4)

4 (1.2)

15.9%

Sharma 1991[5]

155

47 (30.3)

62 (40)

23 (14.8)

2 (1.3)

8.4%

Shah 1988[6]

110

51 (46.4)

16 (14.5)

31 (28.1)

3 (2.7)

6.4%

Kachroo 1984[7]

90

15 (16.6)

13 (14.4)

37 (41.1)

2 (2.2)

8.8%

Rao 1984[8]

46

26 (56.5)

18 (39.1)

2 (4.3)

0

26.1%

Ratnatunga 1983[13]

131

11(8.3)

31(23.7)

15(11.4)

NA

NA

Bhansali 1967[10]

96

48 (50)

40 (41.6)

-**

0

20.8%

  1. n – number of cases
  2. NA – data not available
  3. * – includes traumatic perforations
  4. ** – not included in the study