Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of various parameters in NOM-S, NOM-F and Operative groups and demographic, admission and injury characteristics

From: Non operative management of abdominal trauma – a 10 years review

 

NOM-S group

NOM-F group

Operative- group

 

n = 963

n = 108

n = 214

Age

25.31#

35.21#

31.26*#

Male sex

558(58%)

73(68%)

132(62%)

RTA

895(93%)

99(92%)

201(93%)

ISS

37.09# ±1.58

41# ±2.25

40.93*# ±2.25

Haematocrit on admission

36.62# ±3.97

31.83# ±2.67

27.53*# ±2.89

SBP > 90mmhg

885(92%)

68(63%)

25(12%)

Heart rate < 110/min

799(83%)

92(85%)

203(95%)

Blood transfusion

2.77# ±0.85

5.10# ± 0.96

5.57*# ±0.87

Positive FAST

818(85%)

102(94.4%)

214(100%)

Co- morbidities

404(42%)

96(45%)

71(66%)

Liver Injury

320(33%)

0

29*(13.55%) ±1.64

Splenic injury

288(30%)

16(15%)

37*(17.3%) ±0.35

Others

355(37%)

92(85%)

148*(69.16%) ±1.92

  1. RTA Road Traffic Accident, ISS Injury Severity Score, SBP Systolic Blood Pressure, FAST Focused Abdominal Sonography for Trauma.
  2. Values are #Mean ± SEM. The *p < 0.05 were considered as significant as compared to NOM-S and Operative groups.