Skip to main content

Table 3 Effect of VHA-guided strategy on mortality and other outcomes

From: Utility of viscoelastic hemostatic assay to guide hemostatic resuscitation in trauma patients: a systematic review

Study

Mortality (%)

Main findings in the effect of transfusion strategy on mortality

Main findings in the effect of transfusion strategy on the other outcomes

VHA group versus control group

Baksaas-Aasen [29]

11% versus 11% a

14% versus 17% b

25% versus 28% c

29% versus 31% d

25% versus 30% e

There were no statistical differences in mortality in each phase

28-day mortality was reduced in the patients who also had severe TBI in the VHA group

There were no statistically significant differences in other outcomes between the two study groups, including the proportion of patients who were alive and free of massive transfusion, rate of multiple organ dysfunction, the incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic events, 28-day ventilator-free days or ICU-free days, and hospital LOS. So did the serious adverse events

More patients in the VHA group received a study intervention before hemostasis, and at 24 h after injury

The study interventions were given a median of 21 min earlier in the VHA group

Cochrane [ 20]

5% versus 13% b**

11% versus 25% c**

Mortality was significantly lower in the post-TEG group at 24 h and 30 days

Total hospital LOS was significantly greater in the post-TEG group

Total cost and cost of transfusion did not reach statistically significant between the two groups

Blood product wastage was significantly lower in the post-TEG group

Campbell [21] 

16.9% versus 13.5% f

15.6% versus 13.5% g

There were no significant differences in mortality during hospital or ICU admission

No significant difference was seen in the ICU or hospital LOS

Costs of blood products were higher in the post-ROTEM group

Unruh [22]

31.9% versus 55% f

A trend toward reduced mortality (P = 0.076) was observed in the post-TEG group, but it did not reach a significant difference

There was no significant study period effect on ICU admissions or ICU days, mechanical ventilation use, or hospital LOS

A trend toward increased ICU days (11 vs. 7 days, P = 0.073) was observed in the post-TEG group

Wang [23]

3% versus 10% b

12% versus 19% f

There were no significant differences in 24-h mortality or in-hospital total mortality

Shorter hospital and ICU LOS were found in the patients of the TEG-guided group, excluded those who died within the initial 24 h of hospital arrival

Mohamed [24]

34.04% versus 36.78% f

The overall mortality rate had no significant difference between the two groups

However, the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients < 30 years in the post-TEG group (pre-TEG 42.5% versus post-TEG 14.29%, P = 0.0451)

Patients in the post-TEG group had a shorter hospital and ICU LOS

Costs of blood products were reduced in the post-TEG group, especially in patients with penetrating injuries

Gonzalez [28]

7.1% versus 21.8% a*

19.6% versus 36.4% c*

8.9% versus 20% e

ITT analysis showed that the 6-h and 28-day mortality in the TEG group was significantly lower than in the CCT group

There were no significant differences in hemorrhagic deaths between the two groups in the ITT analyses; however, it reached significant differences in the AT analyses

Patients in the TEG group had more ICU-free days (P = 0.091), and more ventilator-free days (P = 0.082) than those in the CCT group; however, these differences were not statistically significant

The groups had similar rates of sepsis, AKI, DVT, and pulmonary embolism

Yin [25]

10.3% versus 6.5% c

No significant differences were found in mortality at 28-d between the two groups

No significant differences were found in ICU and hospital LOS between the two groups

Costs of blood products appeared to be lower in the TEG group but were not significantly different

At 24 h, patients in the TEG group had shorter aPTT compared to patients in the control group

Tapia [26]

–

For patients who received 6U or more RBCs, and blunt trauma patients who received 10U or more RBCs, there was no difference in mortality between the TEG-guided group and MTP group

While 30-day mortality decreased in penetrating trauma patients who received 10U or more RBCs in the TEG-directed group

–

Kashuk [27]

29% versus 65% f

The overall mortality fell after the TEG algorithm implementation; however, it did not reach a significant difference

–

  1. VHA viscoelastic hemostatic assay; TEG thrombelastography; ROTEM rotational thromboelastometry; CCT conventional coagulation test; RBCs red blood cells; MOI mechanism of injury; LOS length of stay; ICU intensive care unit; TBI traumatic brain injury; AKI acute kidney injury; DVT deep vein thrombosis; ISS injury severity score; ITT intent-to-treat; AT as treated; MTP massive transfusion protocol; aPTT activated partial thromboplastin time
  2. **P < 0.01 compared with VHA group, *P < 0.05 compared with VHA group
  3. a6-h mortality
  4. b24-h mortality
  5. c28-day or 30-day mortality
  6. d90-day mortality
  7. edeath from exsanguination
  8. fin-hospital total mortality
  9. gmortality in ICU, –: not reported