Skip to main content

Table 2 MINORS scores assessing the risk of bias in non-randomized studies

From: Training curriculum in minimally invasive emergency digestive surgery: 2022 WSES position paper

 

Clearly stated aim

Inclusion of consecutive patients

Prospective data collection

Endpoints appropriate to study aim

Unbiased assessment of study endpoint

Follow-up appropriate to study aim

 < 5% Lost to follow up

Prospective calculation of study size

Adequate control group

Contemporary

groups

Baseline equivalence of groups

Adequate statistical analyses

TOTAL MINORS SCORE

Jaffer et al. [29]

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

10/16

Kim et al. [27]

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

2

2

1

2

15/24

Lin et al. [21]

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

8/16

Liao et al. [22]

2

2

1

2

0

2

0

0

2

1

2

2

16/24

Abdelrahman et al. [31]

2

2

1

2

0

2

0

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

9/16

Kim et al. [23]

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

8/16

Mán et al. [24]

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

2

2

2

2

16/24

Brown et al. [32]

2

2

1

2

0

2

0

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

9/16

Kim et al. [30]

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

1

2

2

1

2

18/24

Lee et al. [25]

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

2

2

1

2

15/24

Ussia et al. [26]

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

0

2

2

2

2

16/24

Angeramo et al. [28]

2

2

1

2

0

2

0

0

NA

NA

NA

NA

9/16

Kubat et al. [20]

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

0

2

2

1

2

17/24