Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the studies identified in the systematic review

From: Effectiveness and safety of tourniquet utilization for civilian vascular extremity trauma in the pre-hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reference

Year

Country

Study type

Study period

Participants

Intervention

Comparison

Passos et al.

2014

Canada

Retrospective cohort study

01/2001–12/2010

190

PH tourniquet (n = 4)

No tourniquet (n = 186)

Scerbo et al.

2017

US

Retrospective cohort study

10/2008–01/2016

281

PH tourniquet (n = 252)

Late tourniquet (n = 29)

Teixeira et al.

2018

US

Retrospective cohort study

01/2011–12/2016

1026

PH tourniquet (n = 181)

No tourniquet (n = 845)

Smith et al.

2019

US

Retrospective cohort study

2010–2018

204

PH commercial tourniquet application (n = 127)

No tourniquet (n = 77)

McNickle et al.

2019

US

Retrospective cohort study

01/2013–12/2017

138

PH tourniquet (n = 69)

No tourniquet (n = 69)

Henry et al.

2021

US

Retrospective cohort study

10/2015–07/2019

944

PH tourniquet (n = 97)

No tourniquet (n = 847)

Schroll et al.

2022

US

Prospective cohort study

2015–2020

1312

PH improvised or commercial tourniquet application (n = 962)

No tourniquet + late tourniquet (n = 350)

  1. PH, prehospital; PH tourniquet: tourniquet applied to patients before arriving at a hospital; late tourniquet: tourniquet applied after hospital arrival; no tourniquet: no tourniquet use at all