Skip to main content

Table 2 Certainty of evidence (CoE) using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of evidence with individual endpoint

From: Effectiveness and safety of tourniquet utilization for civilian vascular extremity trauma in the pre-hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

No of trials

(No of patients)

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Publication bias

Effect (95% CI)

Overall quality of evidence

Overall mortality

7

(4095)

Downgraded*

Not downgraded

I2 = 47%

Not downgraded

Not

downgraded

Downgraded

OR = 0.48

(0.27 to -0.86)

VERY LOW

RBC transfusion

6

(3787)

Downgraded*

Downgraded

I2 = 99%

Not downgraded

Downgraded

NA

MD = -2.09

(-5.00 to 0.82)

VERY LOW

FFP transfusion

4

(2732)

Downgraded*

Downgraded

I2 = 98%

Not downgraded

Downgraded

NA

MD = -1.00

(-4.00 to 2.00)

VERY LOW

Length of hospital stays (days)

5

(2645)

Downgraded*

Downgraded

I2 = 66%

Not downgraded

Downgraded

NA

MD = -0.80

(-2.90 to 1.30)

VERY LOW

Length of hospital stays (days)

3

(2251)

Downgraded*

Downgraded

I2 = 92%

Not downgraded

Downgraded

NA

MD = -0.51

(-2.08 to 1.06)

VERY LOW

Amputation

7

(4095)

Downgraded*

Downgraded

I2 = 60%

Not downgraded

Downgraded

NA

OR = 0.85

(0.43 to 1.68)

VERY LOW

Compartment syndrome

4

(813)

Downgraded*

Not downgraded

I2 = 0%

Not downgraded

Downgraded

NA

OR = 0.94

(0.37 to 2.35)

VERY LOW

  1. CI: Confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; MD, mean difference; NA: non-available
  2. *Concerns arose because more than half of the included studies had a serious to critical overall risk of bias; therefore, the certainty of the evidence was downgraded by one level
  3. Imprecision due to confidence intervals, as 95% CI crosses MD of 0 and OR of 1; therefore, certainty of evidence was downgraded by 1 level
  4. Concerns arose due to possible presence of publication bias led by asymmetry funnel plot; therefore, certainty of evidence was downgraded by 1 level
  5. GRADE Working Group grades of evidence: High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect; however, there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited. The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate. The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect