Emergency department thoracotomy for the critically injured patient: Objectives, indications, and outcomes
© Cothren and Moore; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 16 February 2006
Accepted: 24 March 2006
Published: 24 March 2006
In the past three decades there has been a significant clinical shift in the performance of emergency department thoracotomy (EDT), from a nearly obligatory procedure before declaring any trauma patient to select patients undergoing EDT. The value of EDT in resuscitation of the patient in profound shock but not yet dead is unquestionable. Its indiscriminate use, however, renders it a low-yield and high-cost procedure. Overall analysis of the available literature indicates that the success of EDT approximates 35% in the patient arriving in shock with a penetrating cardiac wound, and 15% for all penetrating wounds. Conversely, patient outcome is relatively poor when EDT is done for blunt trauma; 2% survival in patients in shock and less than 1% survival with no vital signs. Patients undergoing CPR upon arrival to the emergency department should be stratified based upon injury and transport time to determine the utility of EDT. The optimal application of EDT requires a thorough understanding of its physiologic objectives, technical maneuvers, and the cardiovascular and metabolic consequences.
The number of patients arriving at hospitals in extremis, rather than expiring in the prehospital setting, has increased due to the maturation of regionalized trauma systems throughout the world. Salvage of individuals with imminent cardiac arrest or those already undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation often requires immediate thoracotomy as an integral component of their initial resuscitation in the emergency department. The optimal application of emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) requires a thorough understanding of its physiologic objectives, technical maneuvers, and the cardiovascular and metabolic consequences. This review highlights these features and the specific clinical indications of EDT, all of which are essential for the appropriate use of this potentially life-saving yet costly procedure.
Historical perspective and clinical outcomes
Emergent thoracotomy came into use in the United States for the treatment of heart wounds and anesthesia-induced cardiac arrest in the late 1800's and early 1900's. The concept of a thoracotomy as a resuscitative measure began with Schiff's promulgation of open cardiac massage in 1874  and had expanded indications with treatment of penetrating chest wounds and heart lacerations around the turn of the century [2, 3]. With improvement in patient resuscitation and an ongoing evaluation of patient outcomes, the indications for emergent thoracotomy shifted. Initially, cardiovascular collapse from medical causes was the most common reason for thoracotomy in the early 1900's. The demonstrated efficacy of closed-chest compression by Kouwenhoven and colleagues  in 1960 and the introduction of external defibrillation in 1965 by Zoll and colleagues  virtually eliminated the practice of open-chest resuscitation for medical cardiac arrest. The use of emergent thoracotomy following trauma also declined as less invasive therapeutics, such as pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade, were preferred . In the late 1960s, the pendulum toward emergent thoracotomy swung again, as refinements in cardiothoracic surgical techniques salvaged patients with life-threatening chest wounds  and use of temporary thoracic aortic occlusion saved patients with exsanguinating abdominal hemorrhage [8, 9].
In the past three decades there has been a significant clinical shift in the performance of EDT. While the use of EDT in resuscitation of the patient in profound shock but not yet dead is unquestionable, its indiscriminate use, renders it a low-yield and high-cost procedure [10–12]. During this swing of the pendulum, several groups have attempted to elucidate the clinical guidelines for EDT [13, 14]. In 1979, we conducted a critical analysis of 146 consecutive patients undergoing EDT and suggested a selected approach to its use in the moribund trauma patient, based on consideration of the following variables: (1) location and mechanism of injury, (2) signs of life at the scene and on admission to the ED, (3) cardiac electrical activity at thoracotomy, (4) systolic blood pressure response to thoracic aortic cross-clamping .
To validate these clinical guidelines, we established a prospective study in which these data were carefully documented in all patients at the time of thoracotomy. In 1982, the first 400 patients were analyzed . A more recent review has summarized the data on 868 patients who have undergone EDT at the Denver Health Medical Center . Of these, 676 (78%) were dead in the ED, 128 (15%) died in the operating room, and 23 (3%) succumbed to multiple organ failure in the surgical intensive care unit. Ultimately, 41 (5%) patients survived, and 34 recovered fully without neurologic sequelae. While this yield may seem low, it is important to emphasize that thoracotomy was done on virtually every trauma patient delivered to the ED. In fact, 624 (72%) were without vital signs in the field, and 708 patients (82%) had no vital signs at the time of presentation to the ED. In contrast, it is equally important to stress that patients without signs of life at the scene but who responded favorably to resuscitation were excluded from this analysis because they did not require EDT; these patients remind the practitioner that prehospital clinical assessments may not always be reliable in triaging these severely injured patients . Indeed, the authors have salvaged a number of individuals sustaining blunt and penetrating trauma who were assessed to have no signs of life at the scene of injury.
Definitions of Terminology Used in Patients Undergoing EDT
emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) = thoracotomy performed in the emergency department for patients arriving in extremis; this should not be used interchangeably with nor confused with a thoracotomy that is performed in the operating room (OR) or intensive care unit (ICU) within hours after injury for delayed physiologic deterioration.
"no signs of life" = no detectable blood pressure, respiratory or motor effort, cardiac electrical activity, or pupillary activity (i.e., clinical death).
"no vital signs" = no palpable blood pressure, but demonstrate electrical activity, respiratory effort or pupillary reactivity.
Survival Following Emergency Department Thoracotomy in Adults
No Vital Signs
No Signs Of Life
Los Angeles (60)
New York (61)
San Francisco (62)
Los Angeles (60)
New York (66)
San Francisco (62)
San Francisco (62)
Emerging data indicates the clinical results in the pediatric population mirror that of the adult experience. One might expect that children would have a more favorable outcome compared to adults; however, this has not been borne out in multiple studies [18–22]. Beaver and colleagues reported no survivors among 27 patients, from 15 months to 14 years of age, undergoing postinjury EDT at Johns Hopkins Hospital . Powell and coworkers, described an overall survival of 20% (3 of 15 patients) in patients ranging from 4 to 18 years . In a study at Denver Health Medical Center, encompassing an 11-year experience with 689 consecutive EDT, we identified 83 patients (12%) who were under 18 years old . Survival by injury mechanism was 9% (1 of 11) for stab wounds, 4% (1 of 25) for gunshot wounds, and 2% (1 of 47 patients) for blunt trauma. Among 69 patients presenting to the ED without vital signs, only 1 patient (1%) survived (with a stab wound). This contrasted to a salvage of 2 (14%) among 14 patients with vital signs. The outcome in blunt trauma, the predominant mechanism of lethal injury in children, was disappointing, with only 2% salvage, and no survivors when vital signs were absent. Thus, as in adults, outcome following EDT in the pediatric population is largely determined by injury mechanism and physiologic status on presentation to the emergency department.
Current indications and contraindications for EDT
Salvageable postinjury cardiac arrest:
Patients sustaining witnessed penetrating trauma with < 15 minutes of prehospital CPR.
Patients sustaining witnessed blunt trauma with < 5 minutes of prehospital CPR.
Persistent severe postinjury hypotension (SBP ≤ 60 mmHg) due to:
Hemorrhage – intrathoracic, intraabdominal, extremity, cervical
Penetrating trauma: CPR > 15 minutes and no signs of life (pupillary response, respiratory effort, or motor activity)
Blunt trauma: CPR > 5 minutes and no signs of life or asystole
In sum, overall analysis of the available literature indicates that the success of EDT approximates 35% in the patient arriving in shock with a penetrating cardiac wound, and 15% for all penetrating wounds. Patients undergoing CPR upon arrival to the emergency department should be stratified based upon injury and transport time to determine the utility of EDT. Conversely, patient outcome is relatively poor when EDT is done for blunt trauma; 2% survival in patients in shock and less than 1% survival with no vital signs.
Indications for EDT
On arrival to the ED, the time from initiation of CPR is recorded; blunt trauma patient with greater than 5 minutes of prehospital CPR and no signs of life are declared, while penetrating trauma patients with greater than 15 minutes of prehospital CPR and no signs of life are pronounced. Patients within the time guidelines or those with signs of life trigger ongoing resuscitation and EDT. After performing a left anterior thoracotomy and pericardotomy, the patient's intrinsic cardiac activity is evaluated; patients in asystole without associated cardiac injury are declared. Patient's with a cardiac wound, tamponade, and associated asystole are aggressively treated; the cardiac wound is repaired first followed by manual cardiac compressions and intracardiac injection of epinephrine. Following several minutes of such treatment and volume resuscitation, one should reassess salvageability; we define this as the patient's ability to generate a systolic blood pressure > 70 mmHg.
Patients with an intrinsic rhythm following EDT should be treated according to underlying pathology. Those with tamponade should undergo cardiac repair, either in the trauma bay or the operating room. Control of intrathoracic hemorrhage may entail hilar crossclamping, digital occlusion of the direct injury, or even packing of the apices for subclavian injuries. Treatment of bronchovenous air embolism includes crossclamping of the hilum, putting the patient in Trendelenberg's position, aspirating the left ventricle and aortic root, and massaging the coronaries. Finally, aortic crossclamping is performed to decrease the required effective circulating volume, for either thoracic or abdominal sources of hemorrhage, and facilitate resuscitation. In all of these scenarios, reassessment of the patient following intervention and aggressive resuscitation efforts is performed, with the goal systolic pressure of 70 mmHg used to define salvageability.
The primary objectives of EDT are to (a) release pericardial tamponade; (b) control cardiac hemorrhage; (c) control intrathoracic bleeding; (d) evacuate massive air embolism; (e) perform open cardiac massage; and (f) temporarily occlude the descending thoracic aorta. Combined, these objectives attempt to address the primary issue of cardiovascular collapse from mechanical sources or extreme hypovolemia.
Release pericardial tamponade and control cardiac hemorrhage
The highest survival rate following EDT is in patients with penetrating cardiac wounds, especially when associated with pericardial tamponade [7, 17]. Early recognition of cardiac tamponade, prompt pericardial decompression, and control of cardiac hemorrhage are the key components to successful EDT and patient survival following penetrating wounds to the heart . The egress of blood from the injured heart, regardless of mechanism, results in tamponade physiology. The classic description of clinical findings, Beck's triad, is rarely observed in the emergency department; therefore, a high index of suspicion in the at-risk patient sustaining penetrating torso trauma is crucial, with prompt intervention essential. The first two phases of cardiac tamponade – restricted ventricular diastolic filling, compromised stroke volume and coronary perfusion, and diminished cardiac output – may be aggressively managed with definitive airway control, volume resuscitation to increase preload, and pericardiocentesis. The patient in the third phase of tamponade – intrapericardial pressure approaches the ventricular filling pressure with profound hypotension (SBP < 60) – should undergo EDT rather than pericardiocentesis as the management for evacuation of pericardial blood [25, 26]. Following release of tamponade, the source of tamponade can be directly controlled with appropriate interventions based on the underlying injury.
Control intrathoracic hemorrhage and perform open cardiac massage
Life-threatening intrathoracic hemorrhage occurs in less than 5% of patients following penetrating injury presenting to the ED, and in even lower percentage of patients sustaining blunt trauma . The most common injuries include penetrating wounds to the pulmonary hilum and great vessels; less commonly seen are torn descending thoracic aortic injuries with frank rupture or penetrating cardiac wounds exsanguinating into the thorax through a traumatic pericardial window. There is a high mortality rate in injuries to the pulmonary or thoracic great-vessel lacerations due to the lack of hemorrhage containment by adjacent tissue tamponade or vessel spasm. Either hemithorax can rapidly accommodate more than half of a patient's total blood volume before overt physical signs of hemorrhagic shock occur. Patients with exsanguinating wounds require EDT with rapid control of the source of hemorrhage if they are to be salvaged.
In patients with cardiopulmonary arrest, external chest compression provides approximately 20 to 25% of baseline cardiac output, with 10 to 20% of normal cerebral perfusion [28–30]. While this degree of vital organ perfusion can provide reasonable salvage rates for 15 minutes, few normothermic patients survive 30 minutes of closed-chest compression. Moreover, in models of inadequate intravascular volume (hypovolemic shock) or restricted ventricular filling (pericardial tamponade), external chest compression fails to augment arterial pressure or provide adequate systemic perfusion; the associated low diastolic volume and pressure result in inadequate coronary perfusion . Therefore, closed cardiac massage is ineffective for postinjury cardiopulmonary arrest. The only potential to salvage the injured patient with ineffective circulatory status is immediate EDT.
Achieve thoracic aortic cross clamping
The rationale for temporary thoracic aortic occlusion in the patient with massive hemorrhage is two-fold. First, in patients with hemorrhagic shock, aortic cross clamping redistributes the patient's limited blood volume to the myocardium and brain . Second, patients sustaining intraabdominal injury may benefit from aortic cross clamping due to reduction in subdiaphragmatic blood loss . Temporary thoracic aortic occlusion augments aortic diastolic and carotid systolic blood pressure, enhancing coronary as well as cerebral perfusion [32, 33]. Experimental observations suggest that temporary aortic occlusion is valuable in the patient either with shock due to non-thoracic trauma or in patients with continued shock following the repair of cardiac or other exsanguinating wounds [34, 35]. Indeed, occlusion of the descending thoracic aorta appears to increase the return of spontaneous circulation following cardiopulmonary resuscitation [36, 37]. Reports of successful resuscitation using EDT in patients in hemorrhagic shock and even sustaining cardiac arrest following extremity and cervical injuries exist . In these situations, EDT may be a temporizing measure until the patient's circulating blood volume can be replaced by blood product transfusion. In carefully selected patients, aortic cross clamping may effectively redistribute the patient's blood volume until external replacement and control of the hemorrhagic source is possible. However, once the patient's blood volume has been restored, the aortic cross clamp should be removed, as there is substantial metabolic cost and a finite risk of paraplegia associated with the procedure [39–41]. Typically, complete removal of the aortic cross clamp or replacement of the clamp below the renal vessel should be performed within 30 minutes.
Evacuate bronchovenous air embolism
Bronchovenous air embolism can be a subtle entity following thoracic trauma, and is likely to be much more common than is recognized [42–44]. The clinical scenario typically involves a patient sustaining penetrating chest injury who precipitously develops profound hypotension or cardiac arrest following endotracheal intubation and positive-pressure ventilation. Traumatic alveolovenous communications produce air emboli that migrate to the coronary arterial systems; any impedance in coronary blood flow causes global myocardial ischemia and resultant shock. The production of air emboli is enhanced by the underlying physiology – there is relatively low intrinsic pulmonary venous pressure due to associated intrathoracic blood loss and high bronchoalveolar pressure from assisted positive pressure ventilation. This combination increases the gradient for air transfer across bronchovenous channels . Although more often observed in penetrating trauma, a similar process may occur in patients with blunt lacerations of the lung parenchyma.
Immediate thoracotomy with pulmonary hilar cross clamping prevents further propagation of pulmonary venous air embolism. Thoracotomy with opening of the pericardium also provides access to the cardiac ventricles; with the patient in the Trendelenburg's position (done to trap air in the apex of the ventricle), needle aspiration is performed to remove air from the cardiac chambers. Additionally, vigorous cardiac massage may promote dissolution of air already present in the coronary arteries . Aspiration of the aortic root is done to alleviate any accumulated air pocket, and direct needle aspiration of the right coronary artery may be lifesaving.
The optimal benefit of EDT is achieved by a surgeon experienced in the management of intrathoracic injuries. The emergency physician, however, should not hesitate to perform the procedure in the moribund patient with a penetrating chest wound when thoracotomy is the only means of salvage. The technical skills needed to perform the procedure include the ability to perform a rapid thoracotomy, pericardiotomy, cardiorrhaphy, and thoracic aortic cross clamping; familiarity with vascular repair techniques and control of the pulmonary hilum are advantageous. As the procedure has been described in detail elsewhere, we will briefly touch on some "pearls" which may facilitate one's approach and success in performing EDT.
Pericardiotomy and cardiac hemorrhage control
Advanced cardiac life support interventions including cardiac massage
Thoracic aortic occlusion
Physiologic consequences and optimizing oxygen transport
Once life-threatening intrathoracic injuries are controlled or temporized, the major challenge is restoring the patient's hemodynamic integrity and minimizing vital-organ reperfusion injury. Aortic cross clamping may be life saving during acute resuscitation, but there is a cost to the patient. Occlusion of the aorta results in a reduction in abdominal visceral blood flow to 2 to 8% of baseline values [41, 42]; this decrease in visceral blood flow magnifies the metabolic cost of shock, results in tissue acidosis and increased oxygen debt, and may ultimately contribute to post-ischemic multiple organ failure . Additionally, return of aortic flow may not result in normalization of flow to vital organs; in animal models, blood flow to the kidneys remained at 50% of baseline despite a normal cardiac output . The metabolic penalty of aortic cross clamping becomes exponential when the normothermia occlusion time exceeds 30 minutes [47–49]. Hypoxia of distal organs induces the elaboration, expression, and activation of inflammatory cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory mediators; this systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) has been linked to impaired pulmonary function and multiple organ failure . Consequently, the aortic clamp should be removed as soon as effective cardiac function and adequate systemic arterial pressure have been achieved.
Removal of aortic occlusion may result in further hemodynamic sequelae . Aside from the abrupt reperfusion of the ischemic distal torso, and washout of metabolic products and inflammatory mediators associated with aortic declamping, there are direct effects on the cardiopulmonary system. Thoracic cross clamping in the normovolemic patient may be deleterious because of increased myocardial oxygen demands resulting from the increased systemic vascular resistance . The return of large volumes of blood from the ischemic extremities, with its lower pH, elevated lactate, and other mediators may exert a cardiodepressant activity on myocardial contractility . Overzealous volume loading during aortic occlusion may also result in left ventricular strain, acute atrial and ventricular dilatation and, consequently, precipitous cardiac failure . Following release of aortic occlusion there is impaired left ventricular function, systemic oxygen utilization, and coronary perfusion pressure in the postresuscitation period [51, 53]. The transient fall in coronary perfusion may not be clinically relevant in patients with efficient coronary autoregulation; however, in patients with coronary disease or underlying myocardial hypertrophy, this increase in cardiac work may results in clinically critical ischemia .
Following EDT, patients are frequently in a tenuous physiologic state. The combination of direct cardiac injury, ischemic myocardial insult, myocardial depressants, and pulmonary hypertension adversely impact postinjury cardiac function. Additionally, aortic occlusion induces profound anaerobic metabolism, secondary lactic academia, and release of other reperfusion-induced mediators. Consequently, once vital signs return, the resuscitation priorities shift to optimizing cardiac function and maximizing oxygen delivery to the tissues. The ultimate goal of resuscitation is adequate tissue oxygen delivery and cellular oxygen consumption. Circulating blood-volume status is maintained at the optimal level of cardiac filling in order to optimize cardiac contractility, and the oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood is maximized by keeping the hemoglobin above 7–10 g/dL. If these measures fail to meet resuscitative goals  (e.g., oxygen delivery ≥500 mL/min/2, resolution of base deficit, or clearance of serum lactate), inotropic agents are added to enhance myocardial function.
Complications of EDT
Technical complications of EDT involve virtually every intrathoracic structure. The list of such misadventures included lacerations of the heart, coronary arteries, aorta, phrenic nerves, esophagus, and lungs, as well as avulsion of aortic branches to components of the mediastinum. Additional postoperative morbidity among ultimate survivors of EDT includes recurrent chest bleeding, infection of the pericardium, pleural spaces, sternum, and chest wall, and post-pericardiotomy syndrome. Previous thoracotomy, typically seen in patients following coronary bypass, virtually assures technical problems from the presence of dense pleural adhesions and is therefore a relative contraindication to EDT.
There is a finite risk to the health care providers and trauma team performing an EDT . The use of EDT by necessity involves the rapid use of sharp surgical instruments and exposure to the patient's blood. Even during elective procedures in the OR, the contact rate of patient's blood with the surgeon's skin can be as high as 50%, and the contact rate of patients' blood with health care workers' blood as high as 60%. The overall seroprevalence rate of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among patients admitted to the ED for trauma is around 4%, but is much higher among the subgroup of patients most likely to require an EDT, e.g., 14% of penetrating trauma victims and nearly 30% of intravenous drug abusers. Caplan and colleagues  found that 26% of acutely injured patients had evidence of exposure to HIV (4%), hepatitis B (20%), or hepatitisC virus (14%); there was no difference in the incidence comparing blunt to penetrating trauma. Thus, the likelihood of a health care worker sustaining exposure to HIV or hepatitis in the ED is substantial.
As clinicians faced with increasing scrutiny over appropriation of resources, it is critical to identify the patient population who will benefit from EDT. Resuscitative efforts should not be abandoned prematurely in the potentially salvageable patient but field assessment of salvageability is unreliable. The proposed algorithm clearly defines the indications for EDT in the current era. Our clinical pathway attempts to optimize resource utilization, but outcomes must continue to be evaluated, searching for more definitive predictors of neurologic outcome. Use of more advanced monitoring devices in the ED, together with further elucidation of the characteristics of irreversible shock, may permit a more physiologic prediction of outcome for these critically injured patients in the future.
- Hemreck AS: "The history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation". Am J Surg. 1988, 156: 430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beck CS: "Wounds of the heart". Arch Surg. 1926, 13: 205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blatchford JW: "Ludwig Rehn – The first successful cardiorrhaphy". Ann Thorac Surg. 1985, 39: 492.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kouwenhoven WB, Jude JR, Knickerbocker GG: "Closed-chest cardiac massage". JAMA. 1960, 173: 1064.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zoll PM, Linenthal AJ, Norman LR: "Treatment of unexpected cardiac arrest by external electric stimulation of the heart". NEJM. 1956, 254: 541.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blalock A, Ravitch MM: "A consideration of the nonoperative treatment of cardiac tamponade resulting from wounds of the heart". Surgery. 1943, 14: 157.Google Scholar
- Beall AC Jr, Diethrich EB, Crawford HW, et al.: "Surgical managementof penetrating cardiac injuries". Am J Surg 1966, 112:686-10.1016/0002-9610(66)90105-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ledgerwood AM, Kazmers M, Lucas CE: "The role of thoracic aortic occlusion for massive hemoperitoneum". J Trauma 1976, 16:610.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Millikan JS, Moore EE: "Outcome of resuscitative thoracotomy and descending aortic occlusion performed in the operating room". J Trauma 1984, 24:387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baxter BT, Moore EE, Moore JB, et al.: "Emergency department thoracotomy following injury: Critical determinants for patient salvage". World J Surg 1988, 12:671-10.1007/BF01655882.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Millikan JS: "Rationale for selective application of emergency department thoracotomy in trauma". J Trauma. 1983, 23: 453.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore EE, Moore JB, Galloway AC, et al.: "Postinjury thoracotomy in the emergency department: A critical evaluation". Surgery 1979, 86:590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Powell DW, Moore EE, Cothren CC, et al.: "Is emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy futile care for the critically injured patient requiring prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation?". JACS 2004, 199:211-10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.04.004.Google Scholar
- ACS-COT Subcommittee on Outcomes: "Practice management guidelines for emergency department thoracotomy". JACS 2001, 193:303-10.1016/S1072-7515(01)00999-1.Google Scholar
- Branney SW, Moore EE, Feldhaus KM, et al.: "Critical analysis of two decades of experience with postinjury emergency department thoracotomy in a regional trauma center". J Trauma 1998, 45:87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pickens JJ, Copass MK, Bulger EM: "Trauma patients receivingCPR: Predictors of survival". J Trauma 2005, 58:951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhee PM, Acosta J, Bridgeman A, Wang D, Jordan M, Rich N: "Survival after emergency department thoracotomy: Review of published data from the past 25 years". JACS 2000, 190:288-10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00233-1.Google Scholar
- Beaver BL, Colombani PM, Buck JR: "Efficacy of emergency room thoracotomy in pediatric trauma". J Pediatr Surg 1987, 22:19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rothenberg SS, Moore EE, Moore FA, et al.: "Emergency department thoracotomy in children: A critical analysis". J Trauma 1989, 29:1322.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheikh AA, Culbertson CB: "Emergency department thoracotomy in children: Rationale for selective application". J Trauma 1993, 34:323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Powell RW, Gill EA, Jurkovich GJ, et al.: "Resuscitative thoracotomy in children and adolescents". Am Surg 1988, 54:188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li G, Tang N, DiScala C, Neisel Z, Levick N, Kelen GD: "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric trauma patients: Survival and functional outcome". J Trauma 1999, 47:1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stockinger ZT, McSwain NE: "Additional evidence in support of withholding or terminating cardiopulmonary resuscitation for trauma patients in the field". JACS 2004, 198:227-10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.10.012.Google Scholar
- Breaux EP, Dupont JB Jr, Albert HM, et al.: "Cardiac tamponade following penetrating mediastinal injuries: Improved survival with early pericardiocentesis". J Trauma 1979, 19:461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mattox KL, Beall AC Jr, Jordon GL Jr, et al.: "Cardiorrhaphy in the emergency center". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1974, 68:886PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wall MJ Jr, Mattox KL, Chen CD, et al.: "Acute management of complex cardiac injuries". J Trauma 1997, 42:905.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graham JM, Mattox KL, Beall AC Jr: "Penetrating trauma of thelung". J Trauma 1979, 19:665.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arai T, Dote K, Tsukahara I, et al.: "Cerebral blood flow during conventional, new, and open-chest cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in dogs". Resuscitation 1984, 12:147-10.1016/0300-9572(84)90066-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bartlett RL, Stewart NJ Jr, Raymond J, et al.: "Comparative study of three methods of resuscitation: Closed-chest, open-chest manual, and direct mechanical ventricular assistance". Ann Emerg Med 1984, 13:773-10.1016/S0196-0644(84)80433-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jackson RE, Freeman SB: "Hemodynamics of cardiac massage". Emerg Med Clin North Am 1983, 1:501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Luna GK, Pavlin EG, Kirkman T, et al.: "Hemodynamic effects of external cardiac massage in trauma shock". J Trauma 1989, 29:1430.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spence PA, Lust RM, Chitwood WR Jr, et al.: "Transfemoral balloon aortic occlusion during open cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves myocardial and cerebral blood flow". J Surg Res 1990, 49:217-10.1016/0022-4804(90)90122-I.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wesley RC Jr, Morgan DB: "Effect of continuous intra-aortic balloon inflation in canine open chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation". Crit Care Med 1990, 18:630.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn EL, Moore EE, Moore JB: "Hemodynamic effects of aortic occlusion during hemorrhagic shock". Ann Emerg Med 1982, 11:238-10.1016/S0196-0644(82)80090-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michel JB, Bardou A, Tedgui A, et al.: "Effect of descending thoracic aortic clamping and unclamping on phasic coronary blood flow". J Surg Res 1984, 36:17-10.1016/0022-4804(84)90063-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gedeborg R, Rubertsson S, Wiklund L: "Improved hemodynamics and restoration of spontaneous circulation with constant aortic occlusion during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation". Resuscitation 1999, 40:171-10.1016/S0300-9572(99)00021-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rubertsson S, Bircher NG, Alexander H: "Effects of intra-aortic balloon occlusion on hemodynamics during, and survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs". Crit Care Med 1997, 25:1003-10.1097/00003246-199706000-00018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sheppard FR, Cothren CC, Moore EE, Orfanakis A, Ciesla DJ, Johnson JL, Burch JM: "Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy for non-torso injuries". Surgery in press.Google Scholar
- Connery C, Geller E, Dulchavsky S, et al.: "Paraparesis following emergency room thoracotomy: Case report". J Trauma 1990, 30:362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mitteldorf C, Poggetti RS, Zanoto A, et al.: "Is aortic occlusion advisable in the management of massive hemorrhage? Experimental study in dogs". Shock 1998, 10:141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oyama M, McNamara JJ, Suehiro GT, et al.: "The effects of thoracic aortic cross-clamping and declamping on visceralorgan blood flow". Ann Surg 1983, 197:459.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- King MW, Aitchison JM, Nel JP: "Fatal air embolism following penetrating lung trauma: An autopsy study". J Trauma 1984, 24:753.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas AN, Stephens BG: "Air embolism: A cause of morbidity and death after penetrating chest trauma". J Trauma 1974, 14:633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yee ES, Verrier ED, Thomas AN: "Management of air embolism in blunt and penetrating thoracic trauma". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983, 85:661.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Graham JM, Beall AC Jr, Mattox KL, et al.: "Systemic air embolism following penetrating trauma to the lung". Chest 1977, 72:449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- American Heart Association: "Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care". Circulation 2000, 102(suppl):.Google Scholar
- Fabian TC, Richardson JD, Croce MA, et al.: "Prospective study of blunt aortic injury: Multicenter trial of the American Associationfor the Surgery of Trauma". J Trauma 1997, 42:374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gharagozloo F, Larson J, Dausmann MJ, et al.: "Spinal cord protection during surgical procedures on the descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta". Chest 1996, 109:799.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katz NM, Blackstone EH, Kirklin JW, et al.: "Incremental risk factors for spinal cord injury following operation for acute traumatic aortic transection". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981, 81:669.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adembri C, Kastamoniti E, Bertolozzi I, et al.: "Pulmonary injury follows systemic inflammatory reaction in infrarenal aortic surgery". Crit Care Med 2004, 32:1170-10.1097/01.CCM.0000124875.98492.11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kralovich KA, Morris DC, Dereczyk BE, et al.: "Hemodynamic effects of aortic occlusion during hemorrhagic shock and cardiac arrest". J Trauma 1997, 42:1023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Perry MO: "The hemodynamics of temporary abdominal aortic occlusion". Ann Surg 1968, 168:193.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michel JB, Bardou A, Tedgui A, Levy B: "Effect of descending thoracic aorta clamping and unclamping on phasic coronary blood flow". J Surg Research 1984, 36:17-10.1016/0022-4804(84)90063-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McKinley BA, Kozar RA, Cocanour CS, et al.: "Normal versus supranormal oxygen delivery goals in shock resuscitation: the response is the same". J Trauma 2002, 53:825View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sikka R, Millham FH, Feldman JA: "Analysis of occupational exposures associated with emergency department thoracotomy". J Trauma 2004, 56:867.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caplan ES, Preas MA, Kerns T, et al.: "Seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and rapid plasma reagin in a trauma population". J Trauma 1995, 39:533.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moreno C, Moore EE, Majure JA, et al.: "Pericardial tamponade: A critical determinant for survival following penetrating cardiac wounds". J Trauma 1986, 26:821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tyburski JG, Astra L, Wilson RF, et al.: "Factors affecting prognosiswith penetrating wounds of the heart". J Trauma 2000, 48:587.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Velhamos GC, Degiannis E, Souter I, et al.: "Outcome of a strict policy on emergency department thoracotomies". Arch Surg 1995, 130:774.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asensio JA, Berne JD, Demetriades D, et al.: "One hundred five penetrating cardiac injuries: A 2-year prospective evaluation". J Trauma 1998, 44:1073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rohman M, Ivatury RR, Steichen FM, et al.: "Emergency room thoracotomy for penetrating cardiac injuries". J Trauma 1983, 23:570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker CC, Thomas AN, Trunkey DD: "The role of emergency room thoracotomy in trauma". J Trauma 1980, 20:848.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rhee PM, Foy H, Kaufmann C, et al.: "Penetrating cardiac injuries: A population-based study". J Trauma 1998, 45:366.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Durham LA, Richardson RJ, Wall MJ, et al.: "Emergency center thoracotomy: Impact of prehospital resuscitation". J Trauma 1992, 32:775.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown SE, Gomez GA, Jacobson LE, et al.: "Penetrating chest trauma: Should indications for emergency room thoracotomybe limited?". Am Surg 1996, 62:530.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ivatury RR, Kazigo J, Rohman M, et al.: "Directed" emergencyroom thoracotomy: A prognostic prerequisite for survival".J Trauma 1991, 31:1076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazzorana V, Smith RS, Morabito DJ, et al.: "Limited utility of emergency department thoracotomy". Am Surg 1994, 60:516.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Danne PD, Finelli F, Champion HR: "Emergency bay thoracotomy". J Trauma 1984, 24:796.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.