- Case report
- Open Access
Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy due to impacted dental plate in the thoracic oesophagus: case report
© Sutcliffe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 04 July 2007
- Accepted: 12 November 2007
- Published: 12 November 2007
Retained oesophageal foreign bodies must be urgently removed to prevent potentially serious complications. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is rare and has not been reported in association with a foreign body in the thoracic oesophagus.
We present a case of a dental plate in the thoracic oesophagus that caused high dysphagia. Delayed diagnosis led to a recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, which persisted despite successful surgical removal of the foreign body.
Oesophagoscopy is essential to fully assess patients with persistent symptoms after foreign body ingestion, irrespective of the level of dysphagia. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy may indicate impending perforation and should prompt urgent evaluation and treatment.
- Foreign Body
- Aortic Arch
- Thoracic Oesophagus
- Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy
- Dental Plate
Retained oesophageal foreign bodies may cause potentially fatal complications such as perforation or fistula, and must be removed urgently [1–4]. The majority of cases are successfully removed by either rigid or flexible oesophagoscopy, whilst surgery is rarely indicated . We report a case of an impacted dental plate in the thoracic oesophagus presenting with recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy that was safely removed by thoracotomy one year after ingestion.
Prompt diagnosis and retrieval of impacted foreign bodies in the oesophagus is essential to avoid potentially fatal complications such as perforation and fistulation into surrounding structures such as the tracheobronchial tree or aorta [1–4]. This case illustrates the difficulties of confirming the presence of a retained oesophageal foreign body despite a strong clinical suspicion and the increased symptomatic and surgical morbidity that resulted from such a delayed diagnosis.
A number of investigations can help in diagnosing a retained oesophageal foreign body. Plain radiography can diagnose impacted radio-opaque objects, but is of limited value in detecting radiolucent objects . Contrast studies may also be normal, as in this patient, but are possibly contraindicated due to risk of aspiration . Flexible laryngoscopy allows diagnosis and removal of foreign bodies in the hypopharynx and proximal oesophagus. However, negative laryngoscopy should prompt further assessment by flexible oesophagoscopy to inspect the entire oesophagus . Oesophagoscopy is the investigation of choice for evaluating persistent oesophageal symptoms in any patient with a history of foreign body ingestion. In this case, failure to perform oesophagoscopy resulted in delayed diagnosis and led to the development of a recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.
The differential diagnosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy includes malignant, traumatic, inflammatory and neurological processes . Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy has been reported rarely in relation to impacted foreign bodies in the hypopharynx or cervical oesophagus [10–13], and has not been reported previously in relation to a foreign body in the thoracic oesophagus. In this patient, peri-oesophageal inflammation due to the dental plate caused left recurrent laryngeal nerve compression in the region of the aortic arch, and probably reflected imminent perforation or fistulation.
Oesophageal foreign bodies usually impact at the level of cricopharyngeus or at the aortic arch, and should be removed urgently to prevent complications . Most foreign bodies can be safely removed by flexible oesophagoscopy with an overtube using various devices (for example, forceps, snares, dormia basket, Roth net®) . If flexible oesophagoscopy is unsuccessful, rigid oesophagoscopy may be performed under general anaesthesia. Balloon extraction of foreign bodies under fluoroscopic guidance has also been reported, but this technique is not widely practised .
If endoscopy is unsuccessful, surgical removal is indicated and should be performed by an experienced surgeon in a specialist centre. The first recorded case of surgical removal of an oesophageal foreign body was by Grey Turner in 1947 . A cervical or transthoracic oesophagotomy is usually sufficient although the exact surgical approach will depend upon the level of obstruction. Rarely, oesophageal diversion and/or oesophagectomy may be necessary in the presence of significant oesophageal injury, fistula or contamination .
This case illustrates the importance of flexible oesophagoscopy in assessing patients with persistent oesophageal symptoms after foreign body ingestion, irrespective of the level of dysphagia. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is rare in these patients, but its presence should prompt urgent evaluation and treatment to avoid potentially serious complications.
- Samarasam I, Chandran S, Shukla V, Mathew G: A missing denture's misadventure!. Dis Esophagus. 2006, 19 (1): 53-5. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00539.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taha AS, Nakshabendi I, Russell RI: Vocal cord paralysis and oesophago-broncho-aortic fistula complicating foreign body-induced oesophageal perforation. Postgrad Med J. 1992, 68 (798): 277-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rajesh PB, Goiti JJ: Late onset tracheo-oesophageal fistula following a swallowed dental plate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1993, 7 (12): 661-2. 10.1016/1010-7940(93)90265-D.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naidoo RR, Reddi AA: Chronic retained foreign bodies in the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004, 77 (6): 2218-20. 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01255-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selivanov V, Sheldon GF, Cello JP, Crass RA: Management of foreign body ingestion. Ann Surg. 1984, 199 (2): 187-191. 10.1097/00000658-198402000-00010.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Banham T: Dangers of radio-lucent dental plates. BMJ. 1965, 2 (5456): 302-3.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ginsberg GG: Management of ingested foreign objects and food bolus impactions. Gastrointes Endosc. 1995, 41: 33-8. 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70273-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Johanson JF, Mallery JS, Raddawi HM, Vargo JJ, Waring JP, Fanelli RD, Wheeler-Harbough J: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002, 55 (7): 802-6. 10.1016/S0016-5107(02)70407-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maran AGD: Vocal cord paralysis. Clinical otolaryngology. Edited by: Maran AGD, Stell PM. 1979, Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
- Von Haacke NP, Wilson JA: Missing denture as a cause of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. BMJ. 1986, 292 (6521): 664-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Virgilis D, Weinberger JM, Fisher D, Goldberg S, Picard E, Kerem E: Vocal cord paralysis secondary to impacted esophageal foreign bodies in young children. Pediatrics. 2001, 107 (6): E101-10.1542/peds.107.6.e101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poncz M, Schwartz MW: Vocal cord paralysis and mediastinal mass: an unusual esophageal foreign body presentation. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1978, 17 (2): 196-198.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernstein JM, Burrows SA, Saunders MW: Lodged oesophageal button battery masquerading as a coin: an unusual cause of bilateral vocal cord paralysis. Emerg Med J. 2007, 24 (3): e15-10.1136/emj.2006.044180.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson DB, Bosco JJ, Curtis WD, Faigel DO, Kelsey PB, Leung JW, Mills MR, Smith P, Tarnasky PR, VanDam J, Wassef WY: Endoscopic retrieval devices. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999, 50 (6): 932-4. 10.1016/S0016-5107(99)70199-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grey Turner G: Tooth plate impacted in gullet for fifteen years. Removal by transthoracic oesophagotomy. Br J Surg. 1947, 34 (135): 290-294. 10.1002/bjs.18003413513.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.