Bowel perforation secondary to illegally induced abortion: a tertiary hospital experience in Tanzania
- Joseph B Mabula†1,
- Phillipo L Chalya1Email author,
- Mabula D Mchembe†2,
- Albert Kihunrwa†3,
- Anthony Massinde†3,
- Alphonce B Chandika†1 and
- Japhet M Gilyoma†1
© Mabula et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 11 July 2012
Accepted: 24 August 2012
Published: 1 September 2012
Bowel perforation though rarely reported is a serious complication of induced abortion, which is often performed illegally by persons without any medical training in developing countries. A sudden increase in the number of patients in our centre in recent years prompted the authors to analyze this problem. The study was conducted to describe our own experiences in the surgical management of these patients.
This was a retrospective study involving patients who were jointly managed by the surgical and gynecological teams at Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) for bowel perforation secondary to illegally induced abortion from January 2002 to December 2011. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 17.0.
A total of 68 patients (representing 4.2% of cases) were enrolled in the study. Their ages ranged from 14 to 45 years with a median age of 21 years. Majority of patients were, secondary school students/leavers (70.6%), unmarried (88.2%), nulliparous (80.9%), unemployed (82.4%) and most of them were dependent member of the family. Previous history of contraceptive use was reported in only 14.7% of cases. The majority of patients (79.4%) had procured the abortion in the 2nd trimester. Dilatation and curettage (82.4%) was the most common reported method used in procuring abortion. The interval from termination of pregnancy to presentation in hospital ranged from 1 to 14 days (median 6 days ). The ileum (51.5%) and sigmoid colon (22.1%) was the most common portions of the bowel affected. Resection and anastomosis with uterine repair was the most common (86.8%) surgical procedure performed. Complication and mortality rates were 47.1% and 10.3% respectively. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, gestational age at termination of pregnancy, delayed presentation, delayed surgical treatment and presence of complications were significantly associated with mortality (P<0.001). The overall median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 18 days (1day to 128 days ). Patients who developed complications stayed longer in the hospital, and this was statistically significant (P=0.012).
Bowel perforation following illegally induced abortion is still rampant in our environment and constitutes significantly to high maternal morbidity and mortality. Early recognition of the diagnosis, aggressive resuscitation and early institution of surgical management is of paramount importance if morbidity and mortality associated with bowel perforation are to be avoided.
Globally, illegally induced abortion constitutes a major public health problem and in Africa particularly, the picture is of increasingly hospital admissions for abortion complications and a distressingly high rate of maternal morbidity and mortality due to abortions[1, 2]. Worldwide, there are 30-50 million induced abortions that result in the death of 80,000 - 110,000 women of which an estimated 34,000 are in Sub–Saharan Africa[1, 3]. In settings where access to abortion is highly restricted and desire to regulate fertility is low, deaths due to abortion is a major contributor to maternal mortality. In Tanzania, the law on abortion is highly restrictive and does not permit termination of pregnancy except when it is needed to save the life of a woman. Consequently, women frequently resort to clandestine abortion performed by unskilled practitioners, leading to high rates of maternal mortality and morbidity. The most common reasons for induced abortion are unwanted pregnancy, having lactating small child, health problems, economic and social or family problems that forced women to induce abortion[5–7]. More proximate causes include poor access to contraceptives and contraceptive failure. Family planning programs are very important for prevention of unwanted pregnancy. Lack of education, social stigma and other barriers to abortion, force women to seek abortion in secrecy at a high cost, leaving the poorest, least educated women to unskilled and highly unscrupulous executors and hence the greatest risk of injury.
Complications resulting from unsafe induced abortion are a major cause of maternal mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospitalization and reproductive failure in developing countries including Tanzania. The most common complications of induced abortion include genital sepsis, haemorrhage, pelvic infection with peritonitis and abscess formation, uterine and bowel perforations[9, 10].
Bowel perforation is a rare but serious complication of induced abortion, which is often performed illegally by persons without any medical training in developing countries. The incidence of bowel injury has varied between 5 to 18% cases in different studies[12–14]. The high incidence of perforation in most developing countries has been attributed to late diagnosis resulting from late presentation to health facilities.
The bowel may be injured with the curette, ovum forceps or uterine sound, or even the plastic canula. Bowel perforation occurs when the posterior vaginal wall is violated, allowing the instrument to pierce the underlying structures. The ileum and sigmoid colon are the most commonly injured portions of the bowel due to their anatomic location[9, 16–20].
The management of cases with intestinal injuries following induced abortion poses some major challenges to general surgeons and gynecologists practicing in resource-limited countries. Surgery is considered the treatment of choice in order to improve the chances of survival of patients with this condition. However, late presentation and diagnosis coupled with lack of diagnostic facilities, inadequate preoperative resuscitation and delayed operation are among the hallmarks of the disease in most developing countries including Tanzania[9, 18]. Early recognition and prompt surgical treatment of bowel perforation following illegally induced abortion is of paramount importance if morbidity and mortality associated with bowel perforation are to be avoided. A successful outcome is obtained by prompt recognition of the diagnosis, aggressive resuscitation and early institution of surgical management.
Despite the documented increasing safety of the procedure, many women have limited access to abortion services due to logistic and social obstacles. Hence, complications related to illegally induced abortion such as bowel perforations are believed to still be rampant in our environment. A sudden increase in the number of admissions of patients with bowel perforation following illegally induced abortions in our setting prompted the authors to analyze this problem. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern and treatment outcome of bowel perforations following illegally induced abortions in our local setting.
This was a retrospective study involving patients who were jointly managed by the surgical and gynecological teams at Bugando Medical Centre (BMC) for bowel perforation secondary to illegally induced abortion from January 2002 to December 2011. BMC is a tertiary and teaching hospital for the Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences-Bugando (CUHAS-Bugando). It is located in Mwanza city and has a bed capacity of 1000. The study included all patients who were managed by the surgical and gynecological teams at our centre for bowel perforation secondary to illegally induced abortion during the study period. Patients with incomplete data were excluded from the study. Information on socio-demographic data, parity, gestational age at termination of pregnancy, interval from termination of pregnancy to presentation in hospital, clinical presentation, perforation-surgery interval, site of intestinal injury, management and clinical outcome was obtained from medical record database and from patients’ files, theatre and surgical and gynecological ward registries. All patients were first seen by the gynecologists at the Accident and Emergency department who made the diagnosis based on clinical findings. Radiological, haematological and biochemical investigations were carried out after initial fluid resuscitation. The patients were optimized clinically and commenced on broad spectrum antibiotics active against anaerobes, gram positive and gram negative organisms. The surgical team was then invited to join in the management. Exploratory laparotomy was carried out with repair of uterine and intestinal injury as deemed appropriate by the operating surgeon. Both teams were usually involved in the postoperative management and outpatient follow-up.
The statistical analysis was performed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago IL, U.S.A). The median and ranges were calculated for continuous variables whereas proportions and frequency tables were used to summarize categorical variables. Continuous variables were categorized. Chi-square (Χ2) test were used to test for the significance of association between the independent (predictor) and dependent (outcome) variables in the categorical variables. The level of significance was considered as P<0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictor variables that predict the outcome.
Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the CUHAS-Bugando/BMC joint institutional ethic review committee before the commencement of the study
Out of 1619 patients who presented with induced abortion-related complications during the study period, 79 patients underwent exploratory laparotomy due to associated bowel perforation. Of these, 11 patients were excluded from the study due to incomplete data. Thus, a total of 68 patients representing 4.2% of cases were enrolled in the study. Their ages ranged from 14 to 45 years with a median age of 21 years. The modal age group was 21-25 years accounting for 47.1% of cases. Most patients (61.8%) came from urban areas in Mwanza city and other regions in northwestern Tanzania. Majority of patients were, secondary school students/leavers (70.6%), unmarried (88.2%), nulliparous (80.9%), unemployed (82.4%) and most of them were dependent member of the family.
Distribution of patients according to patient’s characteristics
Number of patients
Area of residence
No formal education
Previous history of contraceptive use
Previous history of induced abortion
Distribution of patients according to reasons for termination of pregnancy
Reason for termination of pregnancy
Fear of expulsion from school
Does not want patents or others to know about the pregnancy
Too young to have a child
Has relationship problem
Cannot afford a child
Reasons not documented
Distribution of patients according to clinical presentation
Offensive vaginal discharge
Passing feces through vagina
Visible loops of bowel through vagina
Signs of peritonitis
The median haemoglobin level and white blood cell count on admission were 10.8 g/dl (range 6.8-13.9 g/dl) and 11.5 x 109 cells/l (range 3.6- 34.2 x 109 cells/l) respectively. The haemoglobin level was less than 10 g/dl in 38 (55.9%) patients. Serum electrolytes revealed hypokalaemia and hyponatraemia in 23 (33.8%) and 18 (26.5%) patients respectively. Serum electrolytes result was not documented in 15 (22.1%) patients. Thirty-two of 68 (47.1%) patients in whom plain abdominal x-rays were taken had pneumoperitoneum. Abdominal ultrasound done in 63 (92.6%) patients detected free peritoneal collections in 49 (77.8%) patients.
The perforation-surgery interval was within 24 h in 16 (23.5%) patients and more than 24 h in 52(76.5%) patients. The interval between presentations at the Accident and Emergency department and surgery (waiting time) ranged from 18 h with a median of 4 h.
All patients in this study underwent exploratory laparotomy. At laparotomy adhesion-exudative and fibrinous, were present between the pelvic organs, the bowels and the anterior abdominal wall. Abscess in the adnexa were in association with tubo-ovarian complexes. The abdominal cavity was heavily contaminated (generalized peritonitis) in 48 (70.6%) patients while in 20 (29.4%) patients the peritoneal cavity was having minimal contamination (localized peritonitis). The amount of pus/faecal matter drained from the peritoneal cavity reflected the extent of peritoneal contamination and ranged from 150 to 2500 mls with a mean of 725 ± 231 mls. It was less than 1000 ml in 21 (30.9%) patients and more than 1000 mls in 47 (69.1%) patients. Associated haemoperitoneum was reported in 8 (11.8%) patients and the amount ranged from 100 to 1500 mls (mean 456± 673 mls). The ileum was involved in 35 (51.5%) patients and jejunum in 14 (20.6%) patients. Fifteen (22.1%) patients had injury to the sigmoid colon and 4 (5.9%) to the recto-sigmoid. The affected bowel was viable in 51 (75.0%), gangrenous in 18 (26.5%) and prolapsed through the vagina or uterine perforations in 10 (14.7%) patients. Associated uterine injuries was noted in all patients and ranged from perforations to outright lacerations positioned posteriorly 39 (57.4%), lateral 16 (23.5%), fundal 10 (14.7%) and anteriorly 3 (4.4%).
Distribution of patients according to surgical procedures performed
Surgical procedures performed
Bowel resection and end to end anastomosis
Uterine perforation repair
Repair of bowel perforations
Bowel perforation repair/bowel resection + colostomy
Distribution of patients according to postoperative complications (N=72)
Surgical site infections
In this study, seven patients died giving a mortality rate of 10.3%. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, gestational age at termination of pregnancy, delayed presentation, timing of surgical treatment (delayed surgical treatment)and presence of postoperative complications were significantly associated with mortality (P<0.001).
The overall length of hospital stay (LOS) ranged from 1 day to 128 days with a median of 18 days . The LOS for non-survivors ranged from 1 to 10 days (median = 4 days ). The length of ICU stay ranged from 1 to 21 days (median = 8 days ). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, patients who developed complications stayed longer in the hospital, and this was statistically significant (P=0.012).
Of the survivors (61), fifty-six (82.4%) patients were discharged well, four (6.6%) patients were discharged against medical advice (DAMA) and the remaining one (1.6%) patient was discharged with permanent colostomy due to severe injury to the recto-sigmoid portion of the colon. Out of 61 survivors, 26 (42.6%) patients were available for follow up at 3months after discharge and the remaining 35 (57.4%) patients were lost to follow up.
Bowel perforation secondary to illegally induced abortion though rare and uncommon in developed world is a significant and major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in countries like Tanzania where abortion laws are still restrictive and most abortions are performed clandestinely and illegally by unqualified personnel[3, 15]. The incidence of abortion-related complications such as bowel injuries has been reported in most developing countries to be increasing at an alarming rate. The rate of bowel perforation as a complication of induced abortion has been reported in literature to range from 5% to 18% of all abortion-related complications[12–14]. However, as in other iatrogenic surgical problems, many cases may have been unreported because of its medico-legal implications[9, 23]. In this study, the rate of 4.2% of bowel perforations may actually be an underestimate and the magnitude of the problem may not be apparent because many cases are not reported for fear of been arrested by police. Several other cases may also have been treated in private hospitals which were not included in the present study. Exclusion of large number of patients in this study as a result of lack of enough data may have also contributed to the underestimation of the magnitude of the problem.
In keeping with other studies[2, 9, 24, 25], majority of our patients who underwent induced abortion were young, secondary school students/leavers, unmarried, nulliparous, unemployed and most of them were dependent member of the family. This finding is contrary to what was observed by Rehman et al. who reported that most of the women were married and had five or more children. The majority of patients in the present study presented themselves for abortion when the pregnancy was advanced and, therefore requiring relatively more complicated termination procedure which only a specialist may handle. But because of socio-economic, cultural and law restrictive reasons most of these women fear of revealing their pregnancy and as a result fall prey to unqualified and inexperienced people who perform such illegal procedures under substandard unhygienic places.
The majority of patients in this study came from urban areas, which is in agreement with other studies done elsewhere[3–5, 9, 11, 15–17]. Previous studies have shown that premarital sexual intercourse is practiced much in urban than in rural areas probably because of increasing urbanization that broke down cultural barriers and predisposed to increased sexuality. This needs to be studied further so that effective intervention strategies for positive behavioral change will be mounted.
In this study, the rate of contraceptive use was as low as 14.7% which is comparable with other studies done in developing countries[4, 24, 28–30]. Low contraceptive uptake may be due to fear about the safety of contraceptives, lack of knowledge about family planning, religious believes and lack of access to services. This calls for proper training and continuing education for awareness on abortion and its complications.
In the present study, more than 70% of patients had procured the abortion in the 2nd trimester which is consistent with other studies[29, 30], but at variant with Enabudoso et al. in which women sought abortion in the first trimester. Ignorance and inability to take quick decision regarding termination of an unwanted pregnancy compel a large number of women to seek illegally induced abortion in the second trimester from unauthorized person in unrecognized places. The delay in procuring abortion in the present study may be due to the restrictive abortion laws in this country, the secrecy associated with abortion and the religious and social norms that do not accommodate abortion practice. Also, lack of financial support may have contributed to delay in procuring abortion.
Women's reasons for seeking abortion were discussed in several studies[9, 24, 29–31]. These included inappropriate timing of the pregnancy, fear of expulsion from school, financial difficulties, and uncertainties about the partner. In this study, fear of expulsion from school was the most common reason for terminating pregnancy.
As reported by many authors[15, 17, 30, 31], majority of patients in the present study presented late in poor general condition. This was found to be the most important factor influencing the outcome of surgical procedure as also emphasized by a number of authors[9, 15, 30]. In resource-poor countries, difficulties in diagnosis, lack of awareness of the disease and delayed referral to tertiary hospital often result in delayed presentation to a hospital
Surgical intervention is considered to be the gold standard treatment for patients with bowel perforation following induced abortion. In this study, all patients underwent surgical treatment which is in keeping with other studies[9, 11, 16–20, 26, 32, 33]. One of the many factors affecting the surgical outcome in patients with bowel perforation is time interval from perforation to laparotomy[9, 15]. Early surgery can minimize the complications while delayed surgery leads to severe peritonitis and septic shock. In the present study, the majority of patients were operated more than 24 h after the onset of illness. Similar observation was reported by other studies done in developing countries[4, 9, 30]. Delayed definitive surgery in the present study may be attributed to late presentation due to lack of accessibility to health care facilities, lack of awareness of the disease as a result some patients with bowel perforation following induced abortion may decide to take medications in the pre-hospital period with hope that the symptoms will abate. It is also possible that some clinicians managing the patients initially may not have considered perforation as a possible diagnosis leading to delayed referral to tertiary care hospital.
In keeping with other studies[9, 16–20], the ileum and the sigmoid colon were the most common parts of the bowel affected. The relative fixity of these portions of the bowel has been suggested as a possible reason for this.
Early surgical interference is the optimal treatment option for perforation. However, the type of surgery to be applied is controversial. The surgical management of small intestinal injuries is fairly straightforward with minimal sequalae. Our practice in managing these patients is a simple closure in solitary perforations and segmental intestinal resection and primary anastomosis in multiple perforations or gangrenous bowel. The management of large bowel injury is more controversial[9, 18]. This is more so when the left colon is involved. A simple colostomy has been reported to be the safest approach in the management of these injuries. Other options include primary repair, resection and primary anastomosis, and repair with a proximal protective colostomy. A simple colostomy is easier and faster to accomplish in these poor surgical risk patients. However, the major drawback of colostomy is the need for a second operation to restore intestinal continuity, the specialized care before closure and the attendant cost which reduces its popularity[34, 35]. The challenge is even more conspicuous in a developing country like Tanzania where resources for caring of patients with colostomy are limited. The management of stoma remains difficult in developing countries because of the shortage of suitable equipment in this respect and peristomal ulceration remains a major problem. Experiences in our centre are primary repair and resection and primary anastomosis in case of viable bowel, whereas colostomy is reserved after resection of a gangrenous large bowel.
The overall complications rate in this series was 47.1% which is higher compared to what was reported by Thapa et al.. High complications rate was also reported by Saleem & Fikree in Pakistan. This difference in complication rates can be explained by differences in antibiotic coverage, meticulous preoperative care and proper resuscitation of the patients before operation, improved anesthesia and somewhat better hospital environment. As reported by Rehman et al., surgical site infection was the most common postoperative complication in our study. High rate of surgical site infection in the present study may be attributed to contamination of the laparotomy wound during the surgical procedure.
In this study, mortality rate was 10.3% which is higher than that reported by Bhutta et al.. High mortality rate in this study is attributed to high gestational age at termination of pregnancy, late presentation, delayed surgical treatment and postoperative complications.
The overall median length of hospital stay was 18 days , a figure which is lower than that reported by Rehman et al.. Our overall median length of hospital stay was significantly long in patients who developed complications postoperatively. Prolonged length of hospitalization results in consumption of large amounts of healthcare resources such as personnel, theatre space, medications, and hospital beds.
Self-discharge against medical advice is a recognized problem in our setting and this is rampant, especially amongst patients with complications of illegally induced abortions. Similarly, poor follow up visits after discharge from hospitals remain a cause for concern. These issues are often the results of poverty, long distance from the hospitals and ignorance.
Bowel perforation following illegally induced abortion is still rampant in our environment and constitutes significantly to high maternal morbidity and mortality. The majority of patients in this study were young, secondary school students/leavers, unmarried, nulliparous, unemployed and most of them presented late to our centre in poor general condition. Early recognition of the diagnosis, aggressive resuscitation and early institution of surgical management is of paramount importance if morbidity and mortality associated with bowel perforation are to be avoided. Appropriate measures focusing at reducing the occurrence of illegally induced abortion are vital in order to reduce the incidence of bowel perforation following illegally induced abortion in this region.
JBM conceived the study and participated in the literature search, writing of the manuscript and editing the article. PLC, MDM, GG, AK, AM, ABC, participated in Study design, data analysis, manuscript writing & editing. In addition PLC submitted the manuscript. JMG was involved in study design, data analysis, coordination and supervision of manuscript writing & editing. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors thank all those who participated in the preparation of this manuscript, and those who were involved in the care of our patients.
- Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, Romero M, Ganatra B, Okonofua FE, Shah IH: Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet. 2006, 368 (9550): 1908-1919. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69481-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tekle H, Kumbi S: Uterine perforation following abortion in Tikur Anbessa Hospital, Addis Ababa Ethiopia: a case series study. Ethiop J Repro Health. 2007, 1 (1): 17-27.Google Scholar
- Laguardia KD, Rotholz MV, Belfort P: A 10-year review of maternal mortality in a municipal hospital in Rio de Janeiro: a cause for concern. Obster Gynaecol. 1990, 75: 186-190.Google Scholar
- Justesen A, Kapiga SH, van Asten HA: Abortions in a hospital setting: hidden realities in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Stud Fam Plann. 1992, 23 (5): 325-329. 10.2307/1966530.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bankole A, Singh S, Haas T: Characteristics of women who obtain induced abortion: a worldwide review. Int Fam Plann Perspec. 1999, 25 (2): 68-77. 10.2307/2991944.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinoti SN, Gaffikin L, Benson J: How research can affect policy and programme advocacy: example from a three-country study on abortion complications in sub-Saharan Africa. East Afr Med J. 2004, 81 (2): 63-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaye DK, Mirembe FM, Bantebya G, Johansson A, Ekstrom AM: Domestic violence as risk factor for unwanted pregnancy and induced abortion in Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11 (1): 90-101. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01531.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherigar JM, Dalal AD, Patel JR: Uterine Perforation with subtotal small bowel prolapse A rare complication of dilatation and curettage. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2005, 1: 6-Google Scholar
- Oludiran OO, Okonofua FE: Morbidity and mortality from Bowel Injury secondary to Induced Abortion. Afr J Reprod Health. 2003, 7 (3): 65-68. 10.2307/3583290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adesiyun AG, Ameh C: An analysis of surgically managed cases of pelvic abscess complicating unsafe abortion. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2006, 18 (2): 14-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jhobta RS, Attri AK, Jhobta A: Bowel injury following induced abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007, 96 (1): 24-27. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jain V: Unsafe abortion: a neglected tragedy. Review from a tertiary care hospital in India. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004, 30 (3): 197-201.Google Scholar
- Naib JM, Siddiqui MI, Afridi B: A review of septic induced abortion cases in one year at Khyber teaching hospital, Peshwar. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2004, 16 (3): 59-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rana A, Pradhan N, Gurung G, Singh M: Induced septic abortion: a major factor in maternal mortality and morbidity. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004, 30 (1): 3-8. 10.1111/j.1341-8076.2004.00146.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhattacharya S, Mukherjee G, Mistri P, Pati S: Safe abortion Still a neglected scenario: a study of septic abortions in a tertiary hospital of Rural India. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2010, 9 (2): 7-Google Scholar
- Coffman S: Bowel injury as a complication of induced abortion. Am Surg. 2001, 67 (10): 924-926.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ntia IO, Ekele BA: Bowel prolapse through perforated uterus following induced abortion. W Afr J Med. 2000, 19 (3): 209-211.Google Scholar
- Okobia MN, Osime U, Ehigiegba AE: Intestinal injuries from complicated abortion a report of five cases. Nig J Clin Pract. 1999, 2 (2): 61-64.Google Scholar
- Imoedemhe DA, Ezimokhai M, Okpere EE, Aboh IF: Intestinal injury following induced abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1984, 22 (4): 303-306. 10.1016/0020-7292(84)90087-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osime U: Intestinal injury following induced abortion. “A report of 4 cases“. Nig Med J. 1978, 8 (4): 378-380.Google Scholar
- Leke RJ: The tragedy of induced abortion Sub-Saharan Africa. Contemporary issues in maternal health care in Africa. Edited by: Boniface T. 1994, Luxemberg: Harwood academic publishers, 281-292.Google Scholar
- Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, Ahman E, Shah IH: Induced abortion: estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet. 2007, 370 (9595): 1338-1345. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61575-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ogundiran OO, Aziken ME: Transmural migration of an intraperitoneal textiloma. Nig J Surg Sci. 2001, 11 (2): 81-83.Google Scholar
- Lema VM, Mpanga V, Makanani BS: Socio-demographic characteristics of adolescent post-abortion patients in Blantyre, Malawi. East Afr Med J. 2002, 79: 306-310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Adanu RMK, Ntumy MN, Tweneboah E: Profile of women with abortion complications in Ghana. Trop Doct. 2005, 35: 138-141.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rehman A, Fatima S, Gangat S, Ahmed A, Memon IA, Soomro N: Bowel injuries secondary to induced abortion: a dilemma. Pak J Surg. 2007, 23: 122-125.Google Scholar
- Anate M: Illegal abortion in Ilorin, Nigeria. Nig Med Pract. 1986, 11: 41-44.Google Scholar
- Olukoya AA, Kaya A, Ferguson BJ, Abou-Zahr C: Unsafe abortion in adolescents. Int J Gynaecol Obstets. 2001, 75: 137-147. 10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00370-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Awusi VO, Okeleke V: Post-induced abortion morbidity and mortality in Oleh, Nigeria. Benin J Postgrad Med. 2010, 12 (1): 20-24.Google Scholar
- Rasch V, Muhammad H, Urassa E, Bergström S: The problem of illegally induced abortion: results from a hospital-based study conducted at district level in Dar es Salaam. Trop Med Int Health. 2000, 5 (7): 495-502. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00584.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Enabudoso EJ, Gharoro EP, Ande ABC, Ekpe UP, Okohue EJ: Five year review of complicated induced abortions in university of Benin teaching hospital, Benin City. Benin J Postgrad Med. 2007, 9 (1): 13-21.Google Scholar
- Megafu U: Bowel injury in septic abortion: the need for more aggressive management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1980, 17: 450-453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Masinde A, Gumodoka B: Management of post-abortion complication. Internet J Gynecol Obstet. 2010, 12: 2-Google Scholar
- Koume J, Kouadio L, Turquin HT: Typhoid ileal perforation: surgical experience of 64 cases. Acta Chir Belg. 2004, 104: 445-447.Google Scholar
- Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Koy M, Kataraihya JB, Hyasinta Jaka H, Mshana SE, Mirambo M, Mchembe MD MD, Giiti G, Gilyoma JM: Typhoid intestinal perforations at a University teaching hospital in Northwestern Tanzania: A surgical experience of 104 cases in a resource-limited setting. World J Emerg Surg. 2012, 7: 4-10.1186/1749-7922-7-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thapa S, Satyal I, Malla K: Safe abortion service and post abortion care: understanding complications. N J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007, 2 (1): 44-49.Google Scholar
- Saleem S, Fikree FF: Induced abortions in low socio-economic settlements of Karachi, Pakistan: rates and women's perspectives. J Pak Med Assoc. 2001, 51 (8): 275-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhutta SZ, Aziz S, Korejo R: Surgical Complications following Unsafe Abortion. J Pak Med Assoc. 2003, 53: 286-Google Scholar
- Ohanaka EC: Discharge against medical advice. Trop Doc. 2002, 32: 149-151.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.