Open Access

Successful open abdomen treatment for multiple ischemic duodenal perforated ulcers in dermatomyositis

  • Roberta Villa1, 2,
  • Stefano Costa1,
  • Sibilla Focchi1, 2,
  • Carlo Corbellini1, 2,
  • Massimo Vigorelli1 and
  • Ettore Contessini Avesani1, 2Email author
World Journal of Emergency Surgery20149:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-9-48

Received: 12 December 2013

Accepted: 7 August 2014

Published: 30 August 2014

Abstract

Introduction

Dermatomyositis is an autoimmune disease characterized by proximal myopathy, cutaneous Gottron papules and heliotrope rash; intestinal involvement associated to acute vasculitis is less common but could be a life-threatening condition.

Methods

A 21-year-old woman, affected by dermatomyositis, presented to our attention with a three-day story of severe abdominal pain, no bowel movement and biliary vomit. She was diagnosed with acute abdomen. A CT scan with bowel contrast demonstrated the presence of a leakage from the retroperitoneal aspect of duodenum. The surgical and clinical management in the light of literature review is presented.

Results

Our first approach consisted in primary repair of the duodenal perforation with omentopexy. Post-operative course was complicated by hemorrhage. A reintervention showed a new perforation associated with multiple ischemic intestinal areas. We performed a gastroenteric anastomosis with functional exclusion of the damaged duodenum and positioning of drainages to create a biliary fistula. A nutritional enteric tube and an open abdomen vacuum-assisted closure system to monitor the fistula creation and to prevent abdominal contamination and collections were positioned. To reduce the amount of biliary leakage, a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was placed, with progressive fistula flow disappearance in four months.

Conclusions

In patients with dermatomyositis, when clinical findings and symptoms suggest abdominal vasculitis, it is very important to be aware of the risk of bowel and particularly duodenal perforations. Open abdomen treatment favors control of contamination by gastrointestinal contents, offers temporary abdominal closure, helps ICU care and delays definitive surgery.

Keywords

Dermatomyositis Duodenal perforations Retroperitoneal air Intestinal ischemia Acute abdomen Emergency surgery Open abdomen

Background

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease characterized by cutaneous heliotropic rash, Gottron papules and proximal myopathy associated to dysphagia, dysphonia, Raynaud phenomenon, fatigue and non-erosive inflammatory polyarthritis [1]. Vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract is a life threatening complication, potential cause of hemorrhage and perforation [2].

We performed a literature review by searching on PubMed (keywords: dermatomyositis, acute vasculitis, ischemic perforation, bowel perforation, emergency surgery): only few cases of bowel perforation associated to dermatomyositis are described in literature, and surgical approach is not always mentioned or specified [219]. In literature gastroenteric vasculitic manifestations of DM are often associated to the juvenile form [20] of the disease, affecting children in 95.1% and adults in 4,9% of cases, with clinical onset before 16 years old. To our knowledge, in literature, are reported 18 articles describing 35 cases of bowel perforation and only two cases related to adult patients (Table 1) [219]. Major sites of perforation are the esophagus (5,5%), the stomach (2,8%), the duodenum (25%), the ileum (2,8%), the right colon (17.1%), the transverse colon (2,8%), the sigmoid colon (2,8%) and the gastrointestinal tract with no specific site description (41,2%). Reported mortality rate is 14,3%, principally due to encephalic vasculitis and septic complications.
Table 1

Intestinal perforation in dermatomyositis, literature review

Author

N° of cases

Site of perforation

Treatment

Outcome

Zarbalian Y et al. 2013 [10]

1

Right colon

Right hemicolectomy

Uneventful

Mamyrova G et al. 2007 [9]

2

Right colon

Right hemicolectomy

Uneventful

  

Duodenum

Unknown

Left hemicolectomy for left colon perforation

Morita Y et al. 2007 [3]

1

Duodenum

Primary suture repair

Uneventful

Chiu SK et al. 2007 [11]

1

Duodenum

Not described

Uneventful

Chen G et al. 2005 [12]

1

Occult perforation

Exploratory laparotomy

Fatal sepsis

Wang IJ et al. 2001 [5]

1

Duodenum

Not described

Uneventful

Suwa A et al. 1997 [8]

1

Right colon

Right hemicolectomy

Uneventful

Lin W et al. 1995 [2]

1

Sigmoid colon

Total colectomy

Fatal sepsis

Ghayad E et al. 1993 [13]

1

Colon

Not described

Not described

Niizawa M et al. 1991 [7]

1

Right colon

Right hemicolectomy

Uneventful

Downey EC et al. 1988 [14]

4

Esophago-colonic

Suture, resection and drainage

Not described

Miller LC et al. 1987 [15]

10

Esophago-colonic

Not described

Fatal sepsis

Schullinger JN et al. 1985 [16]

4

Duodenum, esophagus and colon

Partial gastrectomy, drainage

Uneventful

  

Duodenum

Partial gastrectomy

Uneventful

  

Stomach

Partial gastrectomy

Uneventful

  

Transverse colon

Colostomy

Fatal vascular cerebral complications

Magill HL et al. 1984 [4]

2

Duodenum

Not described

Not described

Thompson JW et al. 1984 [6]

1

Esophagus

Debridement and drainage

Uneventful

Kaplinsky et al. 1978 [17]

1

Duodenum

Non described

Not described

Koiunderliev et al. 1975 [18]

1

Small bowel

Segmentary resection

Uneventful

Bureau et al. 1958 [19]

1

Duodenum

Exploratory laparotomy

Fatal sepsis

We report the case of a 21-year-old patient affected by DM presenting with rapid onset acute abdomen associated to severe vasculitis and complicated duodenal perforation, and discuss the surgical and clinical management in the light of literature review.

Case report

A 21-year-old female diagnosed with DM in 2008, on treatment with prednisone and cyclosporine with moderate disease activity until December 2012, presented to our Emergency Department (ED) with a three day history of diffuse, acute abdominal pain, no bowel movement and biliary vomit. She underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 2010 for symptomatic calculosis. The patient was admitted to our Department with a bowel perforation suspect. An oral follow-through was negative but a CT scan with oral contrast demonstrated a small leakage from the posterior aspect of the third duodenal portion (Figure 1). An emergency laparotomy was performed, with intraoperative finding of multiple ischemic vasculitic lesions of the small bowel, retroperitoneal perforation of the third duodenal portion and a minimum local biliary contamination. The lesion was sutured with omentopexy and an abdominal drainage was placed. After surgery, the patient was transferred to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for post-operative monitoring. Her clinical course, in the following two days, was complicated by acute hemorrhage. She underwent, therefore, a second operation due to the bleeding from a small branch of the anterior pancreaticoduodenal artery. A new ischemic perforation in the same duodenal region was recognized and multiple small ischemic areas involving the entire small bowel were observed. A gastroenteric anastomosis was performed, excluding the duodenum. Two drainages were placed near the perforated site to drain any possible biliary fistula. A nasoenteral feeding tube was then positioned. To manage the potential perforation risk of the duodenal and ileal ulcerations caused by acute vasculitis, to preserve the abdominal cavity from intraperitoneal collections and to create a guided biliary fistula, an open abdomen treatment with negative pressure system was placed; we positioned a temporary fascial mesh to preserve the fascia and prevent its retraction. Two weeks after the second surgical procedure a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was placed to reduce the flow of the peritoneal biliary fistula.
Figure 1

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed free retroperitoneal air (arrow), suspected for a small leakage from the posterior aspect of the third duodenal portion.

We changed the negative pressure dressing every 3–4 days, washing the peritoneal cavity and tightening the fascial mesh. The negative pressure system was very useful and effective because of the large amount of biliary leakage and bowel contamination caused by multiple ischemic ulcers in the second and third portion of the duodenum, otherwise this condition was not manageable with the use of simple drains. After two months, the open abdomen treatment was suspended, the fascial mesh was removed and the fascia was primarily closed. Afterward, we removed the PTBD and the abdominal drain following the execution of abdominal X-ray with oral contrast, demonstrating absence of residual duodenal biliary leakage after four months.

During her ICU stay, the patient presented signs of renal vasculitis, therefore she underwent cycles of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CCVHD), plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), showing clear improvement of her renal function and negative immunological test. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) treatment was complicated by heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with low platelet (PLT) count (99.000/μm3). Argatroban was administered obtaining progressive increase in PLT count (354.000/μm3). Three months after surgery she had seizures with MRI scan positive for vasculitic diffuse encephalic lesions, treated with levetiracetam and metilprendisone. During hospitalization we observed nasal regurgitation of fluids, nasal speech and hoarseness probably due to loss of pharyngoesophageal muscle tone and increase and reduction in hepatic stasis values of unknown origin. After 8 months of follow-up, no signs or symptoms of abdominal disease were reported.

DM is an autoimmune disease characterized by cutaneous heliotropic rash, Gottron papules and proximal myopathy associated to dysphagia, dysphonia, Raynaud phenomenon, fatigue and non-erosive inflammatory polyarthritis [1]. Vasculitis of the gastrointestinal tract is a life threatening complication, more frequently observed in children than in adults [3]. It may vary from segmental bowel edema to ulcerations, gangrene and perforation [2]. The classic clinical findings may be masked by corticosteroids therapy and the radiographic investigations may be negative even in presence of bowel perforation, as the lesion may be very small, retroperitoneal, self sealed or well contained by the adjacent structures. Extraluminal air can be observed in 50–70% of patients [21]. Many cases involve the duodenum and particularly the third portion and its retroperitoneal aspect [35, 9, 11, 16, 17, 19]. Other typical sites of perforation are the esophagus [6, 1416], the cecum, and the right and left colon in their retroperitoneal portion [2, 710, 13]. Histopathological findings are related to acute arteriopathy, with arterial and venous intimal hyperplasia and occlusion of vessels by fibrin thrombi. Chronic vasculopathy is characterized by reduction or complete occlusion of multiple small and medium arteries, subintimal foam cells, fibromixoid neointimal expansion and significant luminal compromise and infiltration of macrophages through the muscle layers into the intima [9, 22]. In younger patients systemic vasculitis with specific involvement of renal and encephalic system can be observed. Radiological features of vasculitis include widespread thickening of mucosal fold and irregularity of small intestine, giving rise to a “stacked coin” appearance [1]. When clinical findings and symptoms suggest possible abdominal vasculitis in a young subject known for DM, it is very important to consider bowel and particularly retroperitoneal perforation. In order to manage this difficult clinical and surgical condition it is mandatory to consider the medical complexity of this disease and the necessity to treat the patient with a specific therapy to control the acute vasculitic process conditioning damage to multiple organs such as respiratory, renal and encephalic system, causing septic shock, renal failure and encephalitis. In this case, during the recovery, we had to manage gastroenteric, renal and encephalic vasculitic complications. The patient underwent three cycles of CCVHD, plasmapheresis and IVIG, multiple antibiotic coverage and careful steroid management. Her course was also complicated by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia during treatment with LMWH to prevent thromboembolism; treatment with argatroban permitted a progressive platelet count improvement. Her recovery was also complicated by dysphagia for both solids and liquids, caused by loss of pharyngoesophageal muscle tone and encephalic vasculitis, which started with seizures and was treated with levetiracetam and metilprednisolone.

Surgical treatment is not standardized because of the rarity and variety of the gastrointestinal DM presentations that can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract. In literature we found few descriptions of ischemic gastrointestinal perforation in DM. Surgical treatments and outcomes reported were anecdotic and varied, including resection of the affected tract or sutures of the lesions (Table 1). High recurrence of reintervention for anastomotic dehiscence or new perforations was observed. The use of negative pressure treatment was never reported. Open abdomen treatment allows the reduction of contamination by gastrointestinal contents decreasing the risk of abdominal collections, favors rapid evidence of hemorrhage permitting a prompt control of the bleeding source, offers temporary abdominal closure, helps ICU care and delays definitive surgery [23, 24]. In this case we performed an open abdomen treatment to better remove the losses and control possible sources of new perforations, without needing of bowel resection. The mesh-mediated fascial traction technique combined with negative pressure treatment allowed to preserve the fascia, and to obtain the fascial primarily closure. As reported in literature, achievement of fascial closure has significant implications for the recovery of the patients, reducing ICU and hospital length of stay, and need for surgical reconstruction of the abdominal wall [25]. We had to perform a bowel deviation because of the critical ischemic vasculitis of the duodenum. To reduce the amount of biliary leakage and to obtain a faster outcome, we positioned a PTBD. Using this composite technique progressive fistula flow reduction was obtained, allowing abdominal closure after two months and PTBD removal after four months.

Conclusions

When clinical findings and symptoms suggest possible abdominal vasculitis in a young subject known for DM, it is very important to consider bowel and particularly duodenal perforation. We found very helpful CT scan with oral contrast to support diagnosis and we had to face the more life-threatening condition of multiple ischemic intestinal ulcerations conditioning duodenal multiple perforations. To manage this challenging condition we used open abdomen treatment with exclusion of the duodenal ischemic perforated tract through a gastroenteroanastomosis and PTBD with the creation of a guided fistula to decrease the flow and obtaining progressive healing with improvement of patient’s general conditions. This surgical treatment must always be accompanied by DM specific medical treatment to avoid further vasculitic complications and to obtain control of the disease activity.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Abbreviations

CAPS: 

Anti-phospholipidic catastrophic syndrome

CT: 

Computed tomography

CVVHD: 

Continuous veno-venous haemodialysis

DM: 

Dermatomyositis

ED: 

Emergency Department

HIT: 

Heparin induced thrombocytopenia

ICU: 

Intensive care unit

IVIG: 

IntraVenous immunoGlobulin

LAC: 

Lupus anti coaugulant

LMWH: 

Low molecular weight heparin

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

NGT: 

Naso-gastric tube

PTBD: 

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

PLT: 

Platelet.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
(2)
Faculty of Medicine, Università degli Studi di Milano

References

  1. Ebert EC: Review article: the gastrointestinal complication of myositis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009, 31 (3): 359-365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lin WY, Wang SJ, Hwang DW, Lan JL, Yeh SH: Technetium-99 m-Pyrophosphate scintigraphic finding of intestinal perforation in dermatomyositis. J Nucl Med. 1995, 36 (9): 1615-1617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Morita Y, Sakuta T, Nagasu H, Kuwabara A, Tokuoka Y, Teshigawara S, Horike H, Kashihara N: Bilateral ureteral stenosis and duodenal perforation in a patient with dermatomyositis. Mod Rheumatol. 2007, 17: 54-56. 10.3109/s10165-006-0529-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Magill HL, Hixson SD, Whitington G, Igarashi M, Hannissian A: Duodenal perforation in childhood dermatomyositis. Pediatr Radiol. 1984, 14: 28-30. 10.1007/BF02386727.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Wang IJ, Hsu WM, Shun CT, Chiang BL, Ni YH: Juvenile dermatomyositis complicated with vasculitis and duodenal perforation. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001, 100 (12): 844-846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Thompson JW: Spontaneous perforation of the esophagus as a manifestation of dermatomyositis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1984, 93: 464-467.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Niizawa M, Maie O, Asanuma Y, Saito T: Adult dermatomyositis with angiopathy and cecum perforation and panniculitis. Nihon Hifuka Zasshi. 1991, 101: 447-451.Google Scholar
  8. Suwa A, Hirakata M, Hama N, Ishiyama K, Amano K, Tanaka H, Fujimaki J, Mimori T, Inada S, Akizuki M: An adult case of dermatmyositis complicated with cecum perforation and panniculitis. Nihon Rinsho Gakkai Kaishi. 1997, 20: 60-66. 10.2177/jsci.20.60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Mamyrova G, Kleiner DE, James-Newton L, Shaham B, Miller FW, Rider LG: Late-onset gastrointestinal pain in juvenile dermatomyositis as a manifestation of ischemic ulceration from chronic endarteropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 2007, 57: 881-884. 10.1002/art.22782.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zarbalian Y, von Rosenvince EC, Twadell W, Mikdashi J: Recurrent pneumatosis intestinalis in a patient with dermatomyositis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013, 23: 2013.Google Scholar
  11. Chiu SK, Yang YH, Wang LC, Chiang BL: Ten-year experience of juvenile dermatomyositis: a retrospective study. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007, 40 (1): 68-73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen GY, Liu MF, Lee YJJ, Chen WC: Combination of massive mucinosis, dermatomyositis, pyoderma gangrenosum-like ulcer, bullae and fatal intestinal vasculopathy in a young female. Eur J Dermatol. 2005, 15 (5): 396-400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghayad E, Tohme A, Ingea H: Digestive manifestastions of juvenile dermatomyositis. A case report and review of the literature. J Med Liban. 1993, 41 (4): 240-243.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Downey EC, Woolley MM, Hanson V: Required surgical theraphy in the pediatric patient with dermatomyositis. Arch Surg. 1988, 123 (9): 1117-1120. 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400330093014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller LC, Michael AF, Kim Y: Childhood dermatomyositis. Clinical course and long-term follow-up. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1987, 26 (11): 561-566. 10.1177/000992288702601101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Shullinger JN, Jacobs JC, Berdon WE: Diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal perforations in childhood dermatomyositis with particular reference to perforations of the duodenum. J Pediatr Surg. 1985, 20 (5): 521-524. 10.1016/S0022-3468(85)80479-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaplinsky N, Hod C, Gal-Semo R, Frankl O: Spontaneous duodenal perforation during fulminant dermatomyositis. J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1978, 33 (5): 213-214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Koiunderliev P, Slavkov N: Case of an acute form of dermatomyositis with visceral changes complicated by small intestine perforation. Khirurgiia (Sofiia). 1975, 28 (1): 79-80.Google Scholar
  19. Bureau Y, Jerry , Barriere , Feve : Acute dermatomyositis: fatal duodenal perforation during treatment with cortansyl. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol Syphiligr. 1958, 65 (3): 327-328.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Neto NS, Goldenstein-Schainberg C: Juvenile dermatomyositis: review and update of the pathogenesis and treatment. Bras J Rheumatol. 2010, 50 (3): 299-312.Google Scholar
  21. Smerud MJ, Johnson CD, Stephens DH: Diagnosis of bowel infarction: a comparison of plain films and CT scans in 23 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990, 154: 99-103. 10.2214/ajr.154.1.2104734.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Marvi U, Chung L, Fiorentino DF: Clinical presentation and evaluation of dermatomyositis. Indian J Dermatol. 2012, 57: 375-381. 10.4103/0019-5154.100486.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kritayakirana K, M Maggio P, Brundage S, Purtill MA, Staudenmayer K, A Spain D: Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010, 3 (2): 118-122. 10.4103/0974-2700.62106.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kushimoto S, Miyauchi M, Yokota H, Kawai M: Damage control surgery and open abdominal management: recent advances and our approach. J Nippon Med Sch. 2009, 76: 280-290. 10.1272/jnms.76.280.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Navsaria P, Nicol A, Hudson D, Cockwill J, Smith J: Negative pressure wound therapy management of the “open abdomen” following trauma: a prospective study and systematic review. World J Emerg Surg. 2013, 8 (1): 4-10.1186/1749-7922-8-4.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Villa et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement