IROA: the International Register of Open Abdomen.
© Coccolini et al. 2015
Received: 3 May 2015
Accepted: 23 July 2015
Published: 16 August 2015
Actually the most common indications for Open Abdomen (OA) are trauma, abdominal sepsis, severe acute pancreatitis and more in general all those situations in which an intra-abdominal hypertension condition is present, in order to prevent the development of an abdominal compartment syndrome. The mortality and morbidity rate in patients undergone to OA procedures is still high. At present many studies have been published about the OA management and the progresses in survival rate of critically ill trauma and septic surgical patients. However several issues are still unclear and need more extensive studies. The definitions of indications, applications and methods to close the OA are still matter of debate. To overcome this lack of high level of evidence data about the OA indications, management, definitive closure and follow-up, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) promoted the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA). The register will be held on a web platform (Clinical Registers®) through a dedicated web site: www.clinicalregisters.org. This will allow to all surgeons and physicians to participate from all around the world only by having a computer and a web connection. The IROA protocol has been approved by the coordinating center Ethical Committee (Papa Giovanni XXIII hospital, Bergamo, Italy). IROA has also been registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02382770).
KeywordsRegister Open abdomen Peritonitis Pancreatitis Trauma Management Surgery
The Open Abdomen (OA) was firstly described almost 120 years ago by Andrew J. McCosh . No popularity was gained by this technique in treating several severe conditions before it has been applied extensively to the severely injured patients in a damage control surgical strategy. Actually the most common indications for OA are trauma, abdominal sepsis, severe acute pancreatitis and more in general all those situations in which an intra-abdominal hypertension condition is present, in order to prevent the development of an abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) [2, 3]. The mortality rates in patients underwent to OA are high, usually over 30 % depending on the patient cohort and on OA causative event . The OA management is a complex and challenging situation that requires a multidisciplinary approach. In fact only by a close cooperation between surgeons and the ICU team would be possible to obtain good results in terms of survival improvement and morbidity reduction. In case of ACS in fact a therapy aiming to achieve early opening and early closure is the key. The “old” paradigm to “close at any cost” the abdomen shifted toward a combination of medical and surgical therapies including negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic closure, that would lead to a reduction in mortality, morbidity and incisional hernia rate.
At present many studies have been published about the OA management and the progresses in survival rate of critically ill trauma and septic surgical patients. All these results have only been obtained thanks to the great work of pioneers, scientific societies and their guidelines [5–9].
At present however several issues are still unclear and need more extensive studies. The definitions of indications, applications and methods to close the OA are still matter of debate. No definitive data demonstrated the real differences between the different techniques to maintain the OA in terms of morbidity and mortality. Patients treated with OA procedures are absolutely heterogeneous even within the same study. Large cohorts of patients treated with the same procedures are rare. Moreover no definitive data exist about nutrition strategies. Neither the impact of the different kind of nutrition on the outcomes has been defined [10–13]. All existing studies accrued patients in at least a few centers with many different biases [14–18]. Even few systematic review and meta-analysis have been published about the topic but no definitive data could be obtained [19, 20]. Lastly no sufficient data about the closure and follow-up of patients treated with OA strategies exist [21–23].
To overcome this lack of high level of evidence data about the OA indications, management, definitive closure and follow-up, the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) promoted the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA).
This prospective observational trial aims to enroll patients undergone to any kind of OA procedure.
The data insertion will be possible after registration to the web platform. Each surgeon will get personal credentials that will allow him/her to register patients. Data will be enrolled and kept protected by a certified system of data encryptation.
The IROA protocol has been approved by the coordinating center Ethical Committee (Papa Giovanni XXIII hospital, Bergamo, Italy). IROA has also been registered to ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02382770). All necessary documents can be downloaded from the register web-site. A free access web-site part will allow to all those who may need more information, to obtain them without the necessity of registration. Each year will be published a paper containing the registered data with all the names of participating physicians. All physicians who enrolled patients can ask to have their own data according to the protocol rules.
WSES strongly believe in the necessity to diffuse emergency and trauma surgery as well as acute care surgery knowledge and to create diffuse collaboration in worldwide scientific projects. For this reason the present paper aims to warmly invite all surgeons or physicians who perform and manage with OA procedures to participate to this international effort in order to get the best result and contribute to better understand the OA procedure.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- McCosh II AJ. The treatment of general septic peritonitis. Ann Surg. 1897;25:687–97.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burch JM, Moore EE, Moore FA, Franciose R. The abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin North Am. 1996;76:833–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carr JA. Abdominal compartment syndrome: A decade of progress. J Am CollSurg. 2013;216:135–46.Google Scholar
- Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N, Bramkamp M, Koehler C, Clavien PA. Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;2005(4):586–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Balogh ZJ, Lumsdaine W, Moore E, Moore FA. Postinjury abdominal compartment syndrome: from recognition to prevention. The Lancet. 2014;384(9952):1466–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Malbrain ML, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J, et al. Results from the international consensus of experts on intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:1722–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain MLNG, De Keulenaer B, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:1190–206.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sugrue M, Jones F, Janjua KJ, Deane SA, Bristow P, Hillman K. Temporary abdominal closure: a prospective evaluation of its effects on renal and respiratory physiology. J Trauma. 1998;45:914–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bosscha K, Hulstaert PF, Hennipman A, Visser MR, Gooszen HG, van Vroonhoven TJMV, et al. Fulminant acute pancreatitis and infected necrosis: results of open management of the abdomen and “planned” reoperations. J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:255–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheatham ML, Safcsak K, Brzezinski SJ, Lube MW. Nitrogen balance, protein loss, and the open abdomen. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(1):127–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collier B, Guillamondegui O, Cotton B, Donahue R, Conrad A, Groh K, et al. Feeding the open abdomen. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31(5):410–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dissanaike S, Pham T, Shalhub S, Warner K, Hennessy L, Moore EE, et al. Effect of immediate enteral feeding on trauma patients with an open abdomen: protection from nosocomial infections. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(5):690–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cothren CC, Moore EE, Ciesla DJ, Johnson JL, Moore JB, Haenel JB, et al. Postinjury abdominal compartment syndrome does not preclude early enteral feeding after definitive closure. Am J Surg. 2004;188(6):653–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wittmann DH, Aprahamian C, Bergstein JM, Edmiston CE, Frantzides CT, Quebbeman EJ, et al. A burr-like device to facilitate temporary abdominal closure in planned multiple laparotomies. Eur J Surg. 1993;159(2):75–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brock WB, Barker DE, Burns RP. Temporary closure of open abdominal wounds: the vacuum pack. Am Surg. 1995;61(1):30–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barker DE, Green JM, Maxwell RA, Smith PW, Mejia VA, Dart BW, et al. Experience with vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma and general and vascular surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(5):784–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cheatham ML, Demetrides D, Fabian TC, Kaplan MJ, Miles WS, Schreiber MA, et al. Prospective study examining clinical outcomes associated with negative pressure wound therapy system and Barker’s vacuum packing technique. World J Surg. 2013;37:2018–30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller RS, Morris Jr JA, Diaz Jr JJ, Herring MB, May AK. Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies. J Trauma. 2005;59(6):1365–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boele van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MG, Busch OR, Goslings JC. Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg. 2009;33(2):199–207.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roberts DJ, Zygun DA, Grendar J, Ball CG, Robertson HL, Ouellet JF, et al. Negative-pressure wound therapy for critically ill adults with open abdominal wounds: a systematic review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(3):629–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Ermlich B, Blatnik JA. A 5-year clinical experience with single-staged repairs of infected and contaminated abdominal wall defects utilizing biologic mesh. Annals of surgery. 2013;257(6):991–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zarzaur BL, DiCocco JM, Shahan CP, Emmett K, Magnotti LJ, Croce MA, et al. Quality of life after abdominal wall reconstruction following open abdomen. J Trauma. 2011;70:285–91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coccolini F, Agresta F, Bassi A, Catena F, Crovella F, Ferrara R, et al. Italian Biological Prosthesis Work-Group (IBPWG): proposal for a decisional model in using biological prosthesis. World J Emerg Surg. 2012;7(1):34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar