Skip to main content

Global impact of COVID-19 pandemic on road traffic collisions



Various strategies to reduce the spread of COVID-19 including lockdown and stay-at-home order are expected to reduce road traffic characteristics and consequently road traffic collisions (RTCs). We aimed to review the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, patterns, and severity of the injury, management, and outcomes of RTCs and give recommendations on improving road safety during this pandemic.


We conducted a narrative review on the effects of COVID-19 pandemic on RTCs published in English language using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar with no date restriction. Google search engine and websites were also used to retrieve relevant published literature, including discussion papers, reports, and media news. Papers were critically read and data were summarized and combined.


Traffic volume dropped sharply during the COVID-19 pandemic which was associated with significant drop in RTCs globally and a reduction of road deaths in 32 out of 36 countries in April 2020 compared with April 2019, with a decrease of 50% or more in 12 countries, 25 to 49% in 14 countries, and by less than 25% in six countries. Similarly, there was a decrease in annual road death in 33 out of 42 countries in 2020 compared with 2019, with a reduction of 25% or more in 5 countries, 15–24% in 13 countries, and by less than 15% in 15 countries. In contrast, the opposite occurred in four and nine countries during the periods, respectively. There was also a drop in the number of admitted patients in trauma centers related to RTCs during both periods. This has been attributed to an increase in speeding, emptier traffic lanes, reduced law enforcement, not wearing seat belts, and alcohol and drug abuse.


The COVID-19 pandemic has generally reduced the overall absolute numbers of RTCs, and their deaths and injuries despite the relative increase of severity of injury and death. The most important factors that affected the RTCs are decreased mobility with empty lines, reduced crowding, and increased speeding. Our findings serve as a baseline for injury prevention in the current and future pandemics.


The world is currently under the major impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The disease spread swiftly and globally from Wuhan, China, the epicenter of the coronavirus, to the rest of the world, which was facilitated by fast transportation methods [1, 2]. Struggle is continuing to contain the spread of the repeated waves of infection. The dynamics of infectious pandemics is different from other natural disasters [3,4,5]. Although they do not cause mass destruction to the infrastructure, they significantly and directly affect the community health and economy [6]. The lack of strong evidence about the transmission routes of the virus at the beginning of the epidemic [1] and inadequate preventive measures increased the rapid spread of the virus [1, 3]. Overtime, better understanding of the infection routes with increased diagnostic tools, reporting, and tracing became more feasible [7,8,9,10]. Countries started implementing various national strategies to reduce the spread of the pandemic including physical distancing, quarantine, stay-at-home orders, closure of schools, restrictions of travel and mass gatherings, and complete lockdown [7, 8]. These measures reduced road traffic movements and changed traffic characteristics [3, 7], which in turn affected road traffic collisions (RTCs) [11]. Congestion, speed, density, and flow of traffic are interlinked [12]. The increased number of empty lanes following travel restrictions reduced road congestion and increased traffic flow [13, 14].

RTCs is a global health problem. It causes around 1.35 million deaths per year worldwide [15] costing around $1.8 trillion every year [16, 17]. In contrast, COVID-19 pandemic caused around 4 million deaths [18], and a global gross domestic product reduction of around 10% [19]. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on RTCs is important and relevant to trauma surgeons and disaster medicine leaders. We aimed to review the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence, patterns, and severity of the injury, management, and outcomes of RTCs and to give recommendations on improving road safety during this and future pandemics.


The planning phase

In the initial planning phase of this study, the authors discussed and aimed to review the different effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on RTCs. This was followed by structuring the general outline of different sections of the paper to be addressed. Based on this outline, we defined the search strategy, sources of literature, and inclusion and exclusion criteria for the literature search.

Data source and search strategy

We followed several procedures to ensure a high-quality review. First, we searched electronic databases, mainly PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, using a wide range of search terms and keywords or a combination of keywords on the two central concepts: COVID-19 and RTC, to retrieve the published articles. The keywords include COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, novel, coronavirus, pandemic, lockdown, quarantine, stay-at-home, shelter-in-place, safer-at-home, social restriction, social distancing, road, traffic collisions, traffic accidents, traffic crashes, motor vehicle, fatality, mortality, death, injury, travel behavior, mobility behavior, public transport, speed, drug, alcohol use, drinking, driving, psychological stress, anxiety, depression, trauma centers, emergency, orthopedic, trauma, emergency surgery, and trauma volume. Second, bibliographic references of these retrieved articles were used to obtain additional relevant papers. Third, the google search engine was used for collecting published discussion papers, reports, and media news. Finally, as a fourth step, several websites were searched to extract and collect published literature.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

We included peer-reviewed journal articles, discussion papers, reports, and media news related to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on RTCs over the last 18 months, which is up to June 2021. No exclusions were made based on the article types, methodology of the study, outcome reported, study period, the scope of the study, and study setting. In other words, any literature related to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on RTCs was included. Literature was excluded if the language of publication was not English.

Data extraction and synthesis

Based on the primary outline of the study, the findings were critically summarized, data extracted, combined and synthesized using a narrative synthesis.

Results and discussion

Effects on traffic congestion

Reduction in traffic congestion affects speed, traffic flow, and traffic density [12, 20]. Reduced mobility may decrease vehicle congestion, which in turn reduces road traffic collisions [21,22,23,24,25,26]. In contrast, it will increase empty road lanes, which may increase speeding (Fig. 1). During the COVID-19 pandemic, travel restrictions had significantly reduced vehicle mobility [27,28,29,30,31,32] which was reduced by more than 50% worldwide [28], with a decrease of 50 to 60% in the Asian countries [28] and 55 to 80% in the European countries [11, 22, 33, 34]. These resulted in a significant decline in public transport (60 to 80%), private cars, driving, and walking globally during March–May 2020 [28,29,30, 35,36,37]. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction among public transport users in Latin America and the Caribbean (by 60 to 90%) [28, 38] and European countries (by 40 to 90%) [21, 22, 30, 33, 39]. Similarly, there was a reduction in car trips (or private car trips) by 65 to 80% in European countries [33, 40]. Overall, these resulted in a sharp decrease in traffic congestion [41, 42].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on traffic volume, traffic lanes, vehicle speed, number of road traffic collisions, injury severity, hospitalization, and RTC deaths

The reduction of traffic congestion has varied considerably in different countries [41, 43, 44]. It ranged between 25 and 75% during lockdown periods in different European countries, with the highest decrease of 75% in France, Spain, and Italy in April 2020 compared with April 2019 [43] (Table 1). Similarly, traffic reduced by 40% in the USA [45], 63% in the UK [46], 77% in South Africa, 74% in New Zealand, 60% in Israel, 59% in Mexico, and 43% in Australia during the same period compared with April 2019 [43]. It is worth noting that the changes in traffic reduction may fluctuate depending on the comparison periods [43, 44] (Table 1). Traffic reduction varied by the local setting, jurisdictions [23, 47,48,49,50,51], type and function of the road [43, 44], residence (urban and rural) [41, 44, 52] and vehicle types [43, 44, 46].

Table 1 Road traffic and road deaths during COVID-19 pandemic

The drop in traffic congestion was not only related to the COVID-19 lockdown. Traffic declined in Sweden (by 22%) and Netherland (by 35%), although they were not under lockdown [43, 44]. Reduced transportation has negative effects on the economy [19, 43]. Travel by private cars increased when restrictions were lifted [53]. In India, more than 90% of public transport users felt unsafe to be infected compared with 13% of those using private transportation [54]. Traffic congestion of major cities was reduced by around 15% worldwide. Nevertheless, it increased by 4% in few cities like Changchun in China [41]. Analyzing traffic congestion indicates that vehicle travel distance is one of the risk factors for RTCs [55].

Effects on vehicle speed

Excessive speed, which is anticipated to increase the incidence and severity of RTCs [12], has occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic [20, 56,57,58,59,60,61]. This was attributed to the significant reduction in traffic volumes and empty roads [42, 44, 58, 59, 62, 63] which encouraged high speeding [20, 42, 47, 56, 57, 60, 64], and resulted in more RTCs despite the few numbers of vehicles [56, 60]. Furthermore, traffic speed enforcement was less [20, 44]. Over-speeding increased by 39% in Spain, 22% in Estonia, 16% in France, and 10% in Denmark [44]. Extreme speeding offenses increased by 236% in the UK [63]. In the USA, over-speeding increased in various metropolitan cities by 13 to 64% during the COVID-19 restrictions [56].

High speed was a key factor for the rise in road fatalities in Northern Ireland and USA despite the quarantine [20, 48, 51, 62]. Road fatalities, attributed to over-speeding and unbelted passengers, increased by 78% in Virginia, USA, despite the reduced incidence of road collisions by 45% [65]. These results were inconsistent in all countries. Although serious speeding increased in France and Germany, road collisions in these countries decreased by 74% and 23%, respectively [44]. In contrast, the speed-related vehicle collisions decreased in Minnesota (USA) and the Czech Republic despite reduced traffic volumes during lockdown [23, 44]. In Nepal, 25% of the RTCs were attributed to speeding during the pandemic [57].

Effects on traffic lanes

The number of empty/open traffic lanes increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was attributed to the reduced traffic volumes following travel restrictions [44, 62, 66, 67]. The impact of these empty/open traffic lanes on excessive speed and associated accidents has been less studied. A report by the National Safety Council, USA, showed that the increased number of empty traffic lanes contributed to excessive speed and increased road death rates in several states during the quarantine [62]. Another study found that empty lanes were associated with increased speed and collisions [14].

Furthermore, several major cities across the globe, such as Philadelphia, Calgary, Berlin, Bogota temporarily replaced traffic lanes with sidewalks and bike lanes to support walking and bicycling by providing more space for pedestrians and cyclists [44, 66]. This was an attempt to improve physical activity and mitigate the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic [6]. Empty lanes encouraged cycling in different major cities of Europe [67]. On the contrary, these empty lanes encouraged extreme speed that resulted in fatality crashes in several other cities [63].

Effects on driving behaviors

Understanding the driving behavior of traffic users is essential for improving road safety during the pandemic [68, 69]. A study from Greece and Saudi Arabia found that the reduced traffic volume during the lockdown increased speed, harsh acceleration, repeated harsh braking, and the usage of mobile cellphones [70]. Adolescent driving time and distance decreased by around 35%, during movement restriction. These changes were less in older, employed, and ethnic minority adolescents but greater in those with greater social tendencies [71]. Interestingly, there was generally a reduction in distraction-related RTCs in Louisiana, USA by 43% during the lockdown, although there was a slight increase in injuries among drivers using mobile phones [72]. Similarly, fatalities with unrestrained drivers increased by 15% in Virginia [65] and 11% in Minnesota, USA [73] indicating a decrease in seat belt compliance [20, 74]. During the COVID-19 pandemic drivers in US and Canada were more likely to drive distracted, not wearing seat belts, over-speeding, and using drugs [75, 76].

Effects on drug and alcohol abuse

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on drug and alcohol-induced traffic collisions has been less studied compared with the impact of the pandemic on health behavior changes. Travel and social restrictions, psychological stress, anxiety, and fear of exposure to the virus were associated with increased alcohol consumption during the pandemic [77,78,79,80]. Alcohol consumption was increased by 14% in Washington, USA [77]. Increased alcohol and drug consumption were attributed to more free time during the COVID-19 pandemic [61, 78]. This may lead to over-speeding, impaired driving, and stunt driving, with reduced road safety [20, 61, 72, 81]. Increased drug and alcohol consumption may lead to increased suicide, domestic violence [82], and risky driving [20, 72, 75, 81,82,83]. Thomas et al. found a significantly higher overall prevalence of drug and alcohol use in seriously and fatally injured RTCs patients, being 65% during the pandemic compared with 51% before that [81]. This included an increase in alcohol use, cannabinoids, and opioids (28% compared with 22%, 33% compared with 21%, and 14% compared with 8%, respectively) [81]. However, other studies from Canada and USA showed a slight reduction (around 3%) in alcohol use during the pandemic [75, 83].

Effects of psychological impact on RTCs

The COVID-19 pandemic has a major psychological impact on the community affecting the mental health and vulnerable groups. This is exaggerated by the preventive measures taken to fight the virus, including quarantine, lockdown, self-isolation, and social distancing, which are unusual human behaviors [6, 84, 85]. Negative emotions, such as depression and anxiety, increased after the COVID-19 outbreak [86,87,88]. Fear of dying, death of family members, fear of stigma, reduced social interaction, and lockdown are potential risk factors of mental health problems [6]. Furthermore, the global failure to find an effective treatment or vaccine for the pandemic, or their shortages is another factor causing psychological pressure, not only to the infected persons but also to the healthy individuals [89]. Negative emotions such as depression, sadness, anxiety, stress, fatigue, distraction have a deleterious effect on driving behaviors and speeding [90,91,92]. The effects of these negative emotions on driver performance and speeding during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on RTCs have not been adequately examined [93]. COVID1-19 pandemic may negatively affect drivers’ mood, which is associated with anxiety and aggressive driving leading to tragic outcomes [94].

Incidence of RTCs

RTCs are related to the risk of exposure to traffic, human behavior, vehicle design, traffic volumes, road infrastructure, and environmental conditions [12, 23, 95, 96]. Although travel restrictions have different effects on the above factors, the effects on road infrastructure, environment, and vehicle design are unchanged. Traffic volume and open/empty traffic lanes possibly affect human behavior [12, 13, 26, 97]. Road traffic collisions during the COVID-19 restrictions were generally reduced globally [11, 21, 44, 51, 56, 98,99,100] which is attributed to the reduced traffic volumes [21, 23, 40, 44, 47]. This reduction varies considerably by country and the type and function of roadways [56]. It was 67% in Spain [11], 26% in Canada [101], 84% in UAE [102], 48% in Nepal [57], 30–60% in Turkey [99, 103], 11 to 58% in USA [23, 56, 59, 72, 104], 29 to 53% in Northern Ireland [51, 105], 74% in France, 28% in Czech Republic, and 23% in Germany [44] during lockdowns.

Severity of RTCs

It is important to clarify that although the numbers of RTCs may have reduced and the absolute number of RTC death may decrease, the relative percentage of victims having severe injuries or death may increase despite the overall reduced standardized RTC population death rate [42, 56, 59, 98], (Fig. 1). For example, the decline of RTCs in Missouri, USA, during the mandated lockdown resulted in decreased mild injuries, but not in serious/fatal injuries [98].

This can be attributed to the increased speed [14, 59, 106], empty lanes, and reduced law enforcement during COVID-19 lockdown [20, 42, 44, 62]. Severe injuries will increase the morbidity, mortality of injured patients, and medical treatment costs [59, 107]. Speeding was the main factor for fatal collisions during the COVID-19 lockdown [42, 56, 59]. The ratio of deadly crashes to all crashes dramatically increased due to excessive speed by 470% in Madrid (Spain), by 292%, in Chicago, by 167% in New York, and by 65% in Boston [63]. The fatality rate increased by 14% per miles driven across the US states during March 2020 [62] and by 37% per miles driven during April 2020 [63], which was attributed to extreme speed [42, 56]. This was reflected in studies from trauma centers that demonstrated an increase of injury severity of an ISS above nine of admitted patients from 35% before the lockdown to about 63% during the lockdown [108].

As explained above, the absolute number of fatal accidents, severe injuries, and mild injuries of RTCs declined by 41%, 8%, and 42%, in Greece, respectively [70]. Similarly, in Australia, the absolute number of fatal crashes decreased by 10% in 2020 compared with the prior three-year, which varied depending on jurisdictions, except in Queensland, where it increased by 11% [49]. Likewise, there was a reduction in the number of fatal collisions by 35% in New York City and 56% across mainland France in April 2020 compared with April 2019 [63].

Outcome of RTCs

The significant reduction of RTCs during the COVID-19 lockdown had different clinical outcomes [43, 44]. There was a significant decrease in the number of traffic-related deaths and injuries in most of the countries. Nevertheless, the opposite occurred in others. This is because the decline in traffic may increase risky driving behaviors such as over-speeding with increased severity of injury despite the decrease in the incidence of RTCs [43, 56, 59, 75, 81]. The strict lockdown during the pandemic reduced the number of RTCs deaths globally [43, 44, 57, 99, 109,110,111] (Table 1).

In contrast, the absolute number of road deaths in April 2020 increased in Slovakia (50%) and Denmark (9%) compared with April 2019 [43, 44]. Similarly, there was an increase in the number of road fatalities in The Netherland (6%) and Sweden (6%) in April 2020 compared with April 2019, although there were no lockdown measures in these countries [43, 44].

Death is mainly caused by high-energy transfer from the vehicle to the road traffic users during the crash. The mortality of pedestrians and motorcyclists are much higher compared with vehicle occupants in the same setting because the pedestrians and motorcyclists are vulnerable road users (pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists) compared with the vehicle occupants [112, 113]. The interaction between the road infrastructure, environment, size and speed of a vehicle, behavior of drivers, traffic mobility, congestion, empty lines will explain the differences in mortality between different states and countries [114,115,116]. The reduction of road deaths on rural roads in Spain during lockdown by 62% resulted in a 10% reduction of the number of road deaths among vulnerable road users (from 37% before lockdown to 27% during lockdown) [44]. Similarly, the reduction of death or seriously injured pedestrians (by 24%) and motorcyclists (by 16%) were less compared with passengers (by 38%) in Northern Ireland, UK [51]. In Australia, there was reduction of the number road traffic deaths among pedestrians (by 20%), motorcyclists (by 12%), passengers (by 11%), and drivers (by 5%), but cyclists death increased by 29% during the initial stage of the lockdown compared with the prior three years [49]. In contrast, road fatality among vulnerable road users increased in the Czech Republic during the lockdown (by 27%); cyclists and motorcyclists death increased by 86% and 50%, respectively [44].

Notably, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on road deaths continued after the lockdown periods. Overall, the number of annual road death dropped significantly in most countries. However, few had the opposite. There was an overall reduction in the annual absolute number of road deaths in most of the 27 European countries by 17% [24], six Balkan countries by 11% [117], in Saudi Arabia by 20% [118], and in Japan by 12% [119, 120]. In contrast, the absolute number of road deaths increased in some countries like Luxembourg by18%, Ireland by 6%, Finland by 4%, and Switzerland by 21% [24, 117]. Similarly, it generally increased in the USA by 7% [110] with major variations in different states [121].

Hospitalization in trauma centers

The reduction of RTCs during the COVID-19 pandemic reduced the number of treated trauma patients at trauma centers globally by 20 to 85% compared with previous years [25, 60, 107, 108, 122,123,124,125,126,127]. This was shown in different countries worldwide like China [126], Spain [125], India [127], South Africa [25], UK [60, 105, 108], USA [107, 128,129,130], Australia [124], Ireland [131], and New Zealand [132]. A study conducted by Ajayi et al. (2020) in UK found a decrease in trauma admissions during COVID-19 lockdown despite an increased incidence of road collisions [133] (Table 2).

Table 2 Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the burden of trauma centers and percentage change of RTC


A significant amount of money was saved from avoiding collisions during the COVID-19 pandemic. These savings are related to material damage, human cost (life and pain), treatment of injuries, lost time at work, and administrative costs, including insurance claims and emergency response [12, 47]. California State, USA, saved more than one billion USD due to reductions in vehicle collisions after the lockdown order [47]. The savings ranged from 7 to 24 billion USD in other five US states [104]. Despite that, the costs of RTCs are still expensive despite the quarantine [134]. Overall, the cost of motor vehicle deaths, injuries, and property damage in the USA was estimated to be more than 474 billion USD in 2020 [121].


  • Ensuring road safety legislations, including its enforcement, driving license requirements, and alcohol consumption regulations during the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Collaborative efforts among different stakeholders, including research institutions, police, hospitals, transport and safety departments, insurance companies on national and international levels to coordinate and act on the needed response to increase road safety during infectious pandemics.

  • Review the lessons learned on RTCs during the COVID-19 pandemic and use them to mitigate the effects of the current and future pandemics.

  • Have a comprehensive digitalized data record to study the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on road safety and use the generated data to monitor and plan future disaster management of pandemics.

  • Carry out comprehensive studies on road safety during the COVID-19 pandemic with appropriate methodological approach and research funds. This should include studies from rural areas and developing countries.


The COVID-19 pandemic has generally reduced the overall absolute numbers of RTCs, and their deaths and injuries despite the relative increase of severity of injury and death. The most important factors that affected the RTCs are decreased mobility with empty lines, reduced crowding, and increased speeding. Our findings serve as a baseline for injury prevention in the current and future pandemics. Future research with a comprehensive methodological approach that includes rural areas and developing countries is demanded.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Road traffic collisions


United Arab Emirates


United Kingdom


United States of America


United States Dollar


  1. World Health Organization. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Situation Report-1. WHO Bulletin. 2020. Available at Accessed 25 Mar 2021.

  2. Rodrigue J, Luke T, Osterholm M. Transportation and pandemics. 2009;1–5. Available at Accessed 25 Mar 2021.

  3. Parr S, Wolshon B, Renne J, Murray-Tuite P, Kim K. Traffic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: statewide analysis of social separation and activity restriction. Nat Hazards Rev. 2020;21:04020025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim K, Francis O, Yamashita E. Learning to build resilience into transportation systems. Transp Res Rec. 2018;2672:30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Emergency Care Research Institute. Healthcare hazard control emergency preparedness and disasters 4: natural disasters. Vol. 3. 2006. p. 1–13. Available at Accessed 25 Mar 2021.

  6. Sheek-Hussein M, Abu-Zidan FM, Stip E. Disaster management of the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Emerg Med. 2021;14:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. COVID‑19 Strategy Update. 2020. Available at Accessed 25 Mar 2021.

  8. World Health Organization. Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). 2020. Available at Accessed 26 Mar 2021.

  9. Riou J, Althaus CL. Pattern of early human-to-human transmission of Wuhan 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), December 2019 to January 2020. Eurosurveillance. 2020;25:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Imai N, Shang Y, Inthavong K, Tu J, Dorigatti I, Cori A, et al. Report 2: estimating the potential total number of novel Coronavirus cases in Wuhan City, China. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saladié Ò, Bustamante E, Gutiérrez A. COVID-19 lockdown and reduction of traffic accidents in Tarragona Province, Spain. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;8:100218.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang C, Quddus MA, Ison SG. The effect of traffic and road characteristics on road safety: a review and future research direction. Saf Sci. 2013;57:264–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin JL. Relationship between crash rate and hourly traffic flow on interurban motorways. Accid Anal Prev. 2002;34:619–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang C, Quddus M, Ison S. A spatio-temporal analysis of the impact of congestion on traffic safety on major roads in the UK. Transp A Transp Sci. 2013;9:124–48.

    Google Scholar 

  15. World Health Organization. The Global status report on road safety. Vol. 2, Geneva. 2018. Available at Accessed 26 Mar 2021.

  16. Hazen A, Ehiri JE. Road traffic injuries: hidden epidemic in less developed countries. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98:73–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen S, Kuhn M, Prettner K, Bloom DE. The global macroeconomic burden of road injuries: estimates and projections for 166 countries. Lancet Planet Health. 2019;3:e390–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. Weekly Operational Update on COVID-19. World Health Organisation. 2021;1–12. Available at Accessed 07 July 2021.

  19. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Global economy faces a tightrope walk to recovery. 2021. Available at Accessed 24 Apr 2021.

  20. Wagner E, Atkins R, Berning A, Robbins A, Watson C, Anderle J. Examination of the traffic safety environment during the second quarter of 2020: Special Report (Report No. DOT HS 813 011). 2020. Available at Accessed 15 May 2021.

  21. Aloi A, Alonso B, Benavente J, Cordera R, Echániz E, González F, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on urban mobility: empirical evidence from the city of Santander (Spain). Sustainability. 2020;12:3870.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bucsky P. Modal share changes due to COVID-19: the case of Budapest. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;8:100141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Devoe E, Leuer D, Saari I, Wagner M. Traffic safety impact of COVID-19: impact to Minnesota motor vehicle crashes, March 1 to May 18. 2020. Available at Accessed 17 Mar 2021.

  24. European Commission. Mobility and Transport. European Commission. 2021. Available at Accessed 23 May 2021.

  25. Morris D, Rogers M, Kissmer N, Du Preez A, Dufourq N. Impact of lockdown measures implemented during the Covid-19 pandemic on the burden of trauma presentations to a regional emergency department in Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa. Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10:193–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cadar RD, Boitor MR, Dumitrescu M. Effects of traffic volumes on accidents: the case of Romania’s national roads. Geogr Tech. 2017;12:20–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barbieri DM, Lou B, Passavanti M, Hui C, Hoff I, Lessa DA, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mobility in ten countries and associated perceived risk for all transport modes. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:1–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Medimorec N, Enriquez A, Hosek E, Peet K. Impacts of COVID-19 on mobility on urban mobility: preliminary analysis of regional trends on urban mobility. 2020. Available at Accessed 23 May 2021.

  29. Lozzi G, Rodrigues M, Marcucci E, Teoh T, Gatta V, Pacelli V. Research for TRAN Committee—COVID-19 and urban mobility: impacts and perspectives. 2020;24. Available at Accessed 23 May 2021.

  30. Gragera A, Albalate D, Schaj G, Aquilué I, Helder J, Espindola L, et al. Urban mobility strategies during COVID-19. 2021. Available at Accessed 15 Apr 2021.

  31. Vannoni M, McKee M, Semenza JC, Bonell C, Stuckler D. Using volunteered geographic information to assess mobility in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-city time series analysis of 41 cities in 22 countries from March 2nd to 26th 2020. Global Health. 2020;16:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nouvellet P, Bhatia S, Cori A, Ainslie KEC, Baguelin M, Bhatt S, et al. Reduction in mobility and COVID-19 transmission. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. de Haas M, Faber R, Hamersma M. How COVID-19 and the Dutch ‘intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;6:100150.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hadjidemetriou GM, Sasidharan M, Kouyialis G, Parlikad AK. The impact of government measures and human mobility trend on COVID-19 related deaths in the UK. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;6:100167.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lapatinas A. The effect of COVID-19 confinement policies on community mobility trends in the EU. 2020. Available at Accessed 20 Apr 2021.

  36. Liu L, Miller HJ, Scheff J. The impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on public transit demand in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:1–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Beck MJ, Hensher DA. Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia—the early days under restrictions. Transp Policy. 2020;96:76–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. UN-Habitat. Cities and pandemics: towards a more just, green and healthy future. 2021. Available at Accessed 06 June 2021.

  39. Jenelius E, Cebecauer M. Impacts of COVID-19 on public transport ridership in Sweden: analysis of ticket validations, sales and passenger counts. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;8:100242.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Aletta F, Brinchi S, Carrese S, Gemma A, Guattari C, Mannini L, et al. Analysing urban traffic volumes and mapping noise emissions in Rome (Italy) in the context of containment measures for the COVID-19 disease. Noise Mapp. 2020;7:114–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tomtom. Traffic Index results 2020. 2020. Available at Accessed 15 Apr 2021.

  42. Meyer MW. COVID lockdowns, social distancing, and fatal car crashes: more deaths on Hobbesian Highways? Camb J Evid Based Policy. 2020;4:238–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. International Transport Forum. Road safety report annual 2020. 2020. Available at Accessed 24 Apr 2021.

  44. European Transport Safety Council. Pin briefing: the impact of Covid-19 lockdowns on road deaths in April 2020. 2020. Available at Accessed 15 Feb 2021.

  45. Federal Highway Administration. Traffic volume trends. Vol. 6. 2020. Available at Accessed 05 May 2021.

  46. Department for Transport. Road Traffic Estimates: Great Britain 2020. 2021. Available at Accessed 05 June 2021.

  47. Shilling F, Waetjen D. Impact of COVID19 mitigation on numbers and costs of California traffic crashes impact of COVID19 mitigation on California traffic crashes. Vol. 2020. 2020. Available at Accessed 10 Mar 2021.

  48. Liu Z, Stern R. Quantifying the traffic impacts of the COVID-19 shutdown. J Transp Eng Part A Syst. 2021;147:04021014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Catchpole J, Naznin F. Impact of COVID-19 on road crashes in Australia. 2020. Available at Accessed 18 Apr 2021.

  50. Carrington D. UK road travel falls to 1955 levels as Covid-19 lockdown takes hold. The Guardian. 2020. Available at Accessed 17 Mar 2021.

  51. Police Service of Northern Ireland. Police recorded injury road traffic collisions and casualties Northern Ireland detailed trends report. 2020. Available at Accessed 20 Mar 2021.

  52. Salas EB. COVID-19: Road traffic change in Brazil 2020. STATISTA. 2020. Available from Accessed 21 Mar 2021.

  53. Beck MJ, Hensher DA. Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia—the early days of easing restrictions. Transp Policy. 2020;99:95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Pawar DS, Yadav AK, Akolekar N, Velaga NR. Impact of physical distancing due to novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) on daily travel for work during transition to lockdown. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;7:100203.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Litman T. A new traffic safety paradigm. 2021. Available at Accessed 25 May 2021.

  56. Pishue B. COVID-19 Effect on collisions on interstates and highways in the US. 2020. Available at Accessed 05 Apr 2021.

  57. Sedain B, Pant PR. Road traffic injuries in Nepal during COVID-19 lockdown. F1000Research. 2021;9:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Vandoros S, Papailias F. Empty streets, speeding and motor vehicle collisions during Covid-19 lockdowns: evidence from Northern Ireland. medRxiv. 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hughes JE, Kaffine D, Kaffine L. Decline in traffic congestion increased accident severity in the wake of COVID-19. 2020;1–32. Available at Accessed 27 Apr 2021.

  60. Park C, Sugand K, Nathwani D, Bhattacharya R, Sarraf KM. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopedic trauma workload in a London level 1 trauma center: the “golden month.” Acta Orthop. 2020;91:556–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Vingilis E, Beirness D, Boase P, Byrne P, Johnson J, Jonah B, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019: what could be the effects on Road safety? Accid Anal Prev. 2020;144:105687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. National Safety Council. Motor vehicle fatality rates jump 14% in march despite quarantines. 2020. Available at Accessed 19 Apr 2021.

  63. Masri L. Car crashes became deadlier during lockdowns across globe: Reuters Insight. Reuters. 2020. Available at Accessed 21 Mar 2021.

  64. Inada H, Ashraf L, Campbell S. COVID-19 lockdown and fatal motor vehicle collisions due to speed-related traffic violations in Japan: a time-series study. Injury Prev. 2021;27:98–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Virginia Department of Transportation. VDOT News—Statewide. 2020. Available at Accessed 27 May 2021.

  66. Laker L. World cities turn their streets over to walkers and cyclists. The Guardian. 2020;7–11. Available at Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  67. Vandy K. Coronavirus: How pandemic sparked European cycling revolution. BBC News. 2020. Available at Accessed 15 Mar 2021.

  68. Klauer SG, Guo F, Simons-Morton BG, Ouimet MC, Lee SE, Dingus TA. Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:54–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Farooq D, Moslem S, Tufail RF, Ghorbanzadeh O, Duleba S, Maqsoom A, et al. Analyzing the importance of driver behavior criteria related to road safety for different driving cultures. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1893.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Katrakazas C, Michelaraki E, Sekadakis M, Yannis G. A descriptive analysis of the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on driving behavior and road safety. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;7:100186.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Stavrinos D, McManus B, Mrug S, He H, Gresham B, Albright MG, et al. Adolescent driving behavior before and during restrictions related to COVID-19. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;144:105686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Barnes SR, Beland L-P, Huh J, Kim D. The effect of COVID-19 lockdown on mobility and traffic accidents: evidence from Louisiana. GLO Discuss Pap. 2020;616. Available at Accessed 19 May 2021.

  73. Minnesota Department of Publuc Safety/Office of Traffic Safety. Minnesota Annual Report 2020. 2021. Available at Accessed 15 May 2021.

  74. Office of Behavioral Safety Research. Traffic safety facts update to special reports on traffic safety during the COVID-19 public health emergency: third quarter Data. Vol. 2020. 2021. Available at Accessed 15 May 2021.

  75. Woods-Fry H, Vanlaar WGM, Wicklund C, Robertson RD. Alcohol-impaired driving and COVID-19 in the United States results from the 2020 TIRF USA road safety monitor. 2020. Available at Accessed 27 May 2021.

  76. Vanlaar BWGM, Woods-fry H, Lyon C, Robertson RD. Road safety monitor 2020: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behaviour and road safety. 2020. Available at Accessed 27 May 2021.

  77. Avery AR, Tsang S, Seto EYW, Duncan GE. Stress, anxiety, and change in alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings among adult twin pairs. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Knell G, Robertson MC, Dooley EE, Burford K, Mendez KS. Health behavior changes during covid-19 pandemic and subsequent “stay-at-home” orders. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Rodriguez LM, Litt DM, Stewart SH. Drinking to cope with the pandemic: the unique associations of COVID-19- related perceived threat and psychological distress to drinking behaviors in American men and women. Addict Behav. 2020;110:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Hobin E, Smith B. Is another public health crisis brewing beneath the COVID-19 pandemic? Can J Public Health. 2020;111:392–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Thomas FD, Berning A, Darrah J, Graham L, Blomberg R, Griggs C, et al. Drug and alcohol prevalence in seriously and fatally injured road users before and during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Natl Highw Traffic Saf Adm. 2020. Available at Accessed 28 May 2021.

  82. Ramalho R. Alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review. Australas Psychiatry. 2020;28:524–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ward G.M. Vanlaar HW-F& RDR. Road Safety Monitor 2020: Drinking and driving in Canada. 2020. Available at Accessed 27 May 2021.

  84. Holmes EA, O’Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L, et al. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:547–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Fiorillo A, Gorwood P. The consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and implications for clinical practice. Eur Psychiatry. 2020;63:e32, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Cao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, et al. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020;287:112934.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Huang Y, Zhao N. Mental health burden for the public affected by the COVID-19 outbreak in China: who will be the high-risk group? Psychol Health Med. 2020;00:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Rajkumar RP. COVID-19 and mental health: a review of the existing literature. Asian J Psychiatry. 2020;52:102066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Sheek-Hussein M, Abu-Zidan FM. Invited editorial: Covid-19 vaccine: hope and reality. Afr Health Sci. 2020;20:1507–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Mann RE, Asbridge M, Stoduto G, Smart RG, Goldbloom DS, Vingilis ER, et al. Psychological distress and collision involvement among adult drivers. Stress Health. 2010;26:127–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Beratis IN, Andronas N, Kontaxopoulou D, Fragkiadaki S, Pavlou D, Papatriantafyllou J, et al. Driving in mild cognitive impairment: the role of depressive symptoms. Traffic Injury Prev. 2017;18:470–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Clapp JD, Olsen SA, Danoff-burg S, Hagewood JH, Hickling J, Hwang VS, et al. Factors contributing to anxious driving behavior: the role of stress history and accident severity. Anxiety Disord. 2012;25:592–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Lemke MK, Apostolopoulos Y, Sönmez S. Syndemic frameworks to understand the effects of COVID-19 on commercial driver stress, health, and safety. J Transp Health. 2020;18:100877.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Hill N. Covid-19 may be a driver of poor behaviour on SA roads. 2020. Available at Accessed 05 June 2021.

  95. World Health Organization. Road traffic injury prevention training manual. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2006. Available at Accessed 10 Mar 2021.

  96. Retallack AE, Ostendorf B. Current understanding of the effects of congestion on traffic accidents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Casado-Sanz N, Guirao B, Attard M. Analysis of the risk factors affecting the severity of traffic accidents on Spanish crosstown roads: the driver’s perspective. Sustainability. 2020;12:2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Qureshi AI, Huang W, Khan S, Lobanova I, Siddiq F, Gomez CR, et al. Mandated societal lockdown and road traffic accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;146:105747.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Oguzoglu U. Discussion paper series: COVID-19 lockdowns and decline in traffic related deaths and injuries. IZA—Institute of Labor Economics. 2020. Available at Accessed 05 Mar 2021.

  100. Doucette ML, Tucker A, Auguste ME, Watkins A, Green C, Pereira FE, et al. Initial impact of COVID-19’s stay-at-home order on motor vehicle traffic and crash patterns in Connecticut: an interrupted time series analysis. Injury Prev. 2021;27:3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Toronto News. Ontario Provincial Police say traffic collisions down, but fatalities up in 2020. Toronto News. 2021. Available at Accessed 23 May 2021.

  102. Abdullah A. Covid-19 impact in UAE : 84% decline in traffic accidents, zero deaths in Sharjah, UAE. Khaleej Times. 2020. Available at Accessed 23 May 2021.

  103. Dağ B. Traffic accidents reduced in Istanbul amid COVID-19. Anadolu Agency. 2020. Available at declined 34% 25 in province, to prevent spread of virus&text=Traffic accidents declined nearly 35, to the provincial police. Accessed 15 Mar 2021.

  104. Brodeur A, Cook N, Wright T. On the effects of COVID-19 safer-at-home policies on social distancing, car crashes and pollution. IZA Discuss Pap. 2020;13255. Available at Accessed 15 Mar 2021.

  105. Jefferies O, Kealey D, Yoong S, Houston R, Tennyson C. The effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on the workload of an adult major trauma centre in Northern Ireland. Ulster Med J. 2021;90:13–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Sun J, Li T, Li F, Chen F. Analysis of safety factors for urban expressways considering the effect of congestion in Shanghai, China. Accid Anal Prev. 2016;95:503–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Stoker S, McDaniel D, Crean T, Maddox J, Jawanda G, Krentz N, et al. Effect of shelter-in-place orders and the COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic trauma at a community level II trauma center. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34:e336–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Rajput K, Sud A, Rees M, Rutka O. Epidemiology of trauma presentations to a major trauma centre in the North West of England during the COVID-19 level 4 lockdown. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Department for Transport. Reported road casualties in Great Britain: provisional estimates year ending June 2020. 2021. Available at Accessed 05 June 2021.

  110. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Early estimate of motor vehicle traffic fatalities in 2020. 2021. Available at Accessed 05 June 2021.

  111. Nomura S, Kawashima T, Yoneoka D, Tanoue Y, Eguchi A, Gilmour S, et al. Trends in deaths from road injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, January to September 2020. Injury Epidemiol. 2020;7:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Biomechanics of road traffic collision injuries: a clinician’s perspective. Singap Med J. 2007;48:693–700.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Aleassa EM, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Effects of vehicle size on pedestrian injury pattern and severity: prospective study. World J Surg. 2013;37:136–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Eid HO, Barss P, Adam SH, Torab FC, Lunsjo K, Grivna M, et al. Factors affecting anatomical region of injury, severity, and mortality for road trauma in a high-income developing country: lessons for prevention. Injury. 2009;40:703–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Hefny AF, Barss P, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Motorcycle-related injuries in the United Arab Emirates. Accid Anal Prev. 2012;49:245–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Hefny AF, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Pedestrian injuries in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Injury Contr Saf Promot. 2015;22:203–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Transport Community Permanent Secretariat. Fatalities for 2020: annual statistics for Western Balkans Official. 2021. Available at Accessed 25 May 2021.

  118. Ministry of Health. MOH statistics and indicators: road traffic injuries and deaths. 2020. Available at Accessed 27 May 2021.

  119. National Police Agency. Overview: trends in numbers of traffic accidents and fatalities (1966–2020). Traffic bureau. 2020. Available at Accessed 05 June 2021.

  120. Japan’s traffic accident deaths drop to record low in 2020. 2020. Available at Accessed 05 June 2021.

  121. National Safety Council. National Safety Council preliminary semiannual estimates. 2021. Available at Accessed 03 June 2021.

  122. Waseem S, Nayar SK, Hull P, Carrothers A, Rawal J, Chou D, et al. The global burden of trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;12:200–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Lubbe RJ, Miller J, Roehr CA, Allenback G, Nelson KE, Bear J, et al. Effect of statewide social distancing and stay-at-home directives on orthopaedic trauma at a Southwestern level 1 trauma center during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34:e343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Jacob S, Mwagiru D, Thakur I, Moghadam A, Oh T, Hsu J. Impact of societal restrictions and lockdown on trauma admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a single-centre cross-sectional observational study. ANZ J Surg. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Nuñez JH, Sallent A, Lakhani K, Guerra-farfan E. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on an emergency traumatology service: experience at a Tertiary Trauma Centre in Spain. Injury. 2020;51:1414–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Zhu W, Li X, Wu Y, Xu C, Li L, Yang J, et al. Community quarantine strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 in Anhui: an evaluation based on trauma center patients. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;96:417–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. Dhillon MS, Kumar D, Saini UC, Bhayana H, Gopinathan NR, Aggarwal S. Changing pattern of orthopaedic trauma admissions during COVID-19 pandemic: experience at a Tertiary Trauma Centre in India. Indian J Orthop. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Ghafil C, Matsushima K, Ding L, Henry R, Inaba K. Trends in trauma admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Los Angeles County. California JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e211320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Salottolo K, Caiafa R, Mueller J, Tanner A, Carrick MM, Lieser M, et al. Multicenter study of US trauma centers examining the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on injury causes, diagnoses and procedures. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021;6:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Kamine TH, Rembisz A, Barron RJ, Baldwin C, Kromer M. Decrease in trauma admissions with COVID-19 pandemic. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21:819–22.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Fahy S, Moore J, Kelly M, Flannery O, Kenny P. Analysing the variation in volume and nature of trauma presentations during COVID-19 lockdown in Ireland. Bone Jt Open. 2020;1:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Christey G, Amey J, Campbell A, Smith A. Variation in volumes and characteristics of trauma patients admitted to a level one trauma centre during national level 4 lockdown for COVID-19 in New Zealand. N Z Med J. 2020;133:81–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Ajayi B, Trompeter A, Arnander M, Sedgwick P, Lui DF. 40 days and 40 nights: clinical characteristics of major trauma and orthopaedic injury comparing the incubation and lockdown phases of COVID-19 infection. Bone Jt Open. 2020;1:330–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. BBC News. Emptier US roads more lethal in coronavirus pandemic, report says. 2020. Available at Accessed 10 Mar 2021.

  135. Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications/Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics. Archived road deaths Australia—monthly bulletins: road deaths Australia: April 2020. 2021. Available at Accessed 15 May 2021.

  136. Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications/ Bureau of Infrastructure and Transport Research Economics. Archived road deaths Australia—monthly bulletins. 2021: road deaths Australia December 2020. Available at Accessed 15 May 2021.

  137. International Transport Forum. Canada road safety. 2020. Available at Accessed 15 Apr 2021.

  138. World Health Organization. Using COVID-19 lockdown road-crash data to inform transport safety policy: Cali, Colombia. 2020. Available at Accessed 15 Apr 2021.

  139. New Zealand Police. 2020 road deaths down on 2019: the number of deaths on New Zealand roads in 2020 was down on 2019, but it’s still too many, says the National Road Policing Manager. 2021. Available at Accessed 25 May 2021.

  140. Jun-tae K. Seoul sees lowest traffic fatalities in 2020. The Korean Herald. 2020. Available at Accessed 25 Apr 2021.

  141. Maryada VR, Mulpur P, Guravareddy AV, Pedamallu SK, Vijay BB. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic trauma volumes: a multi-centre perspective from the State of Telangana. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54:368–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Navsaria PH, Nicol AJ, Parry CDH, Matzopoulos R, Maqungo S, Gaudin R. The effect of lockdown on intentional and nonintentional injury during the COVID-19 pandemic in Cape Town, South Africa: a preliminary report. S Afr Med J. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Conceived and planned the review: YJY, MG, FAZ. Retrieved and ctitically summurized the literature: YJY. drafted the paper: YJY, FAZ. Critically read and edited the paper FAZ. Read and approved the final version: YJY, MG, FAZ. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fikri M. Abu-Zidan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Data used are public published data which is an exempt of the approval the human research ethics committee.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yasin, Y.J., Grivna, M. & Abu-Zidan, F.M. Global impact of COVID-19 pandemic on road traffic collisions. World J Emerg Surg 16, 51 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: